BackKKALSHI

Will the 11th Circuit rule non-intervened False Claims Act qui tam suits unconstitutional?

Yes5%

Vol$3.32K

Markets1

TradeTrade on Kalshi

Event Group

EventKALSHI

Single EventKALSHIPolitics

Will the 11th Circuit rule non-intervened False Claims Act qui tam suits unconstitutional?

Name: Will the 11th Circuit rule non-intervened False Claims Act qui tam suits unconstitutional?
Start: 2026-10-12T08:13:07.822Z
End: 2026-11-11T08:13:07.822Z

Part of: Will the 11th Circuit rule non-intervened False Claims Act qui tam suits unconstitutional?

Before 2028 If United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit holds that the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions violate Article II of the Constitution when the United States declines to intervene in the underlying False Claims Act action and the private relator continues the suit in United States ex rel. Clarissa Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., before Jan 1, 2028, then the market resolves to Yes. The ruling must: Be issued by United States Court of Appeals for th

YesLeading Yes Probability

VolTotal Volume

$3.32K

Markets

Trade on Kalshi

Will the 11th Circuit rule non-intervened False Claims Act qui tam suits unconstitutional?

Yes

Vol

$3.32K

Markets

Trade

Market Price Graph

1 market tracked

Will United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rule holds that the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions violate Article II of the Constitution when the United States declines to intervene in the underlying False Claims Act action and the private relator continues the suit?

kalshi

No data available

All Markets(1)

Market	Price
Will United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rule holds that the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions violate Article II of the Constitution when the United States declines to intervene in the underlying False Claims Act action and the private relator continues the suit?	5%

Markets (1)

Sort

KALSHITech

Will United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rule holds that the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions violate Article II of the Constitution when the United States declines to intervene in the underlying False Claims Act action and the private relator continues the suit?

If United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit holds that the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions violate Article II of the Constitution when the United States declines to intervene in the underlying False Claims Act action and the private relator continues the suit in United States ex