M15 Sharm ElSheikh: Daniel Blazka vs Aristotelis Bezianis
PM $0
1
3
M15 Sharm ElSheikh: Daniel Blazka vs Aristotelis Bezianis
PM $0
1
3
AI Analysis
Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks
PM $0
Reported volume · provider units
3
Saved contracts
0
Same-question pairs
Source snapshot: Oct 25, 2026, 3:00 AM UTC
About This Event
This market refers to the tennis match between Daniel Blazka and Aristotelis Bezianis in the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, Qualifying, originally scheduled for October 25, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Daniel Blazka' if Daniel Blazka advances against Aristotelis Bezianis. This market will resolve to 'Aristotelis Bezianis' if Aristotelis Bezianis advances against Daniel Blazka. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by November 8, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Snapshot observed 2026-10-24T21:00:06.013Z. This analysis describes that snapshot and is not a live news update.
What the contract measures
The main market resolves to "Daniel Blazka" if Daniel Blazka advances against Aristotelis Bezianis, and to "Aristotelis Bezianis" if Aristotelis Bezianis advances [1]. The match is in the M15 Sharm ElSheikh Qualifying draw and is described as "originally scheduled for October 25, 2026 at 6:00AM ET" [1]. That phrase describes the original schedule in the contract rules. It does not confirm the start time shown in this snapshot.
The rules set several fallbacks. If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or has no determined winner by November 8, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the market resolves 50-50. A walkover also resolves 50-50. If a player advances because the opponent retires, defaults, or is disqualified, the market resolves to the player who advances [1]. The primary resolution source is official information from the International Tennis Federation, and a consensus of credible reporting may also be used [1].
Reading the snapshot
The saved snapshot was observed at 2026-10-24T21:00:06.013Z and retrieved at 2026-10-24T23:07:17.731Z [1]. These are different times. The prices describe the observation time, not the moment you are reading this.
At that observation, the main match market priced Daniel Blazka at 0.53 and Aristotelis Bezianis at 0.47 [1]. Two set handicap contracts, each with a listed end time of 2026-11-01T10:00:00.000Z, are also included. One lists Daniel Blazka (-1.5) at 0.495 and Aristotelis Bezianis (+1.5) at 0.505. The other lists Aristotelis Bezianis (-1.5) at 0.495 and Daniel Blazka (+1.5) at 0.505 [1]. These are separate contracts with different conditions, so their prices should not be averaged with the main market or treated as an arbitrage opportunity. The prices are snapshots, not executable quotes or verified probabilities.
The coverage record lists three of three markets for this provider event, with partialSample set to false [1]. The sample is complete for the saved event. The source notes, however, that this does not establish that the provider lists every possible real-world outcome [1].
What remains uncertain
The evidence does not explain why prices sit where they do. It does not show whether the match has started, been played, or been completed, and it does not report any result. Because the snapshot predates the retrieval time, current prices may differ. The listed end time of 2026-11-01T10:00:00.000Z is a contract close time, not a resolution date. The outcome, and therefore the resolution, depends on the rules described above.
References
- Polymarket: M15 Sharm ElSheikh: Daniel Blazka vs Aristotelis Bezianis. Provider data observed 2026-10-24T21:00:06.013Z.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
Saved Oct 24, 2026 UTCOverview
This PredictPedia entry covers a prediction market on a men's tennis match in the M15 Sharm ElSheikh qualifying draw between Daniel Blazka and Aristotelis Bezianis. The contract is listed on Polymarket, and the saved event describes the match as "originally scheduled for October 25, 2026 at 6:00AM ET" [1]. The word "originally" matters: the rules describe the scheduled start, and they do not confirm that the match was played at that time. The main contract resolves to the player who advances. It resolves to "Daniel Blazka" if Blazka advances against Bezianis, and to "Aristotelis Bezianis" if Bezianis advances against Blazka [1]. The rules describe this as a two-outcome contract on who advances in the match. The saved event also includes two set handicap contracts, one with Blazka at -1.5 and one with Bezianis at -1.5 [1]. The supplied evidence does not describe how these handicap contracts are settled, so this entry does not explain their terms. The primary resolution source named in the rules is official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). The rules also allow a consensus of credible reporting to be used [1].
Why It Matters
The contract measures which player advances in one scheduled tennis match. Its rules are more detailed than a simple win bet, because they cover several situations in which the match may not produce a clean winner. If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or has no determined winner by November 8, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the main market resolves 50-50. A walkover, where one player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically, also resolves 50-50 [1]. If a match begins but is not completed, and one player advances because the opponent retires, defaults, or is disqualified, the contract resolves to the player who advances [1]. The saved event lists an end time of November 1, 2026 at 10:00 UTC, and its provider status was active at the observation time [1]. An end time is a listed contract field. It is not confirmation that the match has been played or that a result exists. Prices shown for these contracts are snapshots and are not executable quotes or verified probabilities.
Snapshot context
The latest published provider snapshot for this topic was observed on 2026-10-24 at 21:00 UTC. It contains listings from Polymarket. Market descriptions and listed closing times define the contracts; they do not establish that the real-world outcome has occurred. This article does not include a separately verified news update. [1]
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if the match is canceled or not played?
If the match is canceled, not played at all, ends in a tie, or has no determined winner by November 8, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, the main contract resolves 50-50 [1].
What happens if one player retires during the match?
If the match begins but is not completed and one player advances because the opponent retires, is defaulted, or is disqualified, the contract resolves to the player who advances [1].
What counts as a walkover in this contract?
A walkover is when a player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically. The contract resolves 50-50 in that case [1].
Which source decides the result?
The primary resolution source is official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used [1].
AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.
Related prediction markets
Prices are catalog snapshots and may have changed. Check each market's rules and observation time.
M15 Sharm ElSheikh: Arda Azkara vs Oskari Paldanius
PM $0M15 Sharm ElSheikh: Karim Sherif Abdellatif Abdo vs Martino Guidotti
PM $0M15 Sharm ElSheikh: Carlo Rosellini vs Darwin Andres Macias Elizalde
PM $0M15 Sharm ElSheikh: Niklas Waldner vs Samuel Garcia Hernandez
PM $0M15 Sharm ElSheikh: Conrad Plum vs Marvin Buytaert
PM $0M15 Sharm ElSheikh: NEERAJ RINGANGAONKAR vs Karim El Feky
PM $0Market Insights
Price gaps of 2 pp+
0
Same-question pairs
0
No outcomes on this page have been reviewed as the same question on both platforms yet.
Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.