Skip to main content
Events
GroupKALSHI

Montana 02 House General Election: voter turnout

Montana 02 House General Election: voter turnout
Vol

$0.00

|
Events

1

|
Markets

5

AI Analysis

Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge

72%
Top Probability
$0.00
Volume
5
Markets
1
Platforms

About This Event

Montana 02 House General Election If the total vote count for all participants in Montana 02 House General Election is above X then the market resolves to Yes. The vote count refers to the officially certified results from the relevant election authority. Provisional, absentee, early, mail-in, or electronic ballots are included only if reflected in the official certification. In preferential or ranked-choice systems, the contract resolves based on the vote count identified as the official resul

Current Market Outlook

Kalshi traders are pricing a 72% chance that total certified votes in Montana's 2nd Congressional District will exceed 250,000. This is a moderately confident prediction, meaning the market sees it as likely but with enough uncertainty that a 28% chance of falling short is real. The 250,000 threshold sits roughly 15% above the 2022 district-wide turnout for the old at-large seat, which drew about 217,000 votes.

Key Factors Driving the Odds

Montana gained a second House seat after the 2020 Census, splitting the state into eastern (MT-02) and western (MT-01) districts. MT-02 covers the more rural, Republican-leaning eastern half. The 2022 at-large race saw 217,000 total votes, but that was a midterm with a noncompetitive general election. This cycle includes a presidential race at the top of the ticket, which historically boosts downballot turnout by 8-12% in Montana. Add population growth of roughly 5% since 2022, and a baseline projection lands around 240,000-255,000 votes.

The 72% price reflects that the presidential race could push turnout higher than normal, but also that MT-02 is a safe Republican seat. In low-competition races, some voters skip the ballot box. The 250,000 mark requires turnout to match or exceed the 2020 presidential year level in the old at-large district, which hit 260,000. That's doable but not guaranteed.

What Could Change These Odds

The biggest swing factor is whether former President Trump's campaign drives rural turnout in eastern Montana beyond typical presidential year levels. If his ground game or ballot initiatives (like a proposed abortion rights measure) pull more voters, the 72% could climb toward 85-90%. Conversely, if early voting data shows soft enthusiasm, expect the price to drop below 60%.

The certified result won't come until late November or December, but county-level early vote reports from October will offer the first real signal. If counties like Yellowstone (Billings) report heavy absentee turnout, that pushes the market up. If they show flat numbers, the 72% price looks too high.

AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.

Overview

The Montana 2nd House General Election voter turnout prediction market focuses on the total number of votes cast in the race for Montana's newly created 2nd congressional district. This district was established after the 2020 Census, when Montana's population growth earned it a second House seat, ending a 30-year period with only one at-large representative. The election is scheduled for November 5, 2024. The market resolves based on the officially certified total vote count from the Montana Secretary of State, including all regular, absentee, early, mail-in, and provisional ballots that are part of the final certification. This is a single-member district, so there is no ranked-choice voting system to complicate the count. The creation of Montana's 2nd district was a direct result of the 2020 Census, which showed Montana's population had grown to 1.08 million, up from 989,415 in 2010. This growth was driven largely by migration to western Montana, particularly in counties like Gallatin (Bozeman) and Missoula. The new district covers the eastern two-thirds of the state, including cities like Billings, Great Falls, and Butte. It is considered a safe Republican seat, with a Cook Partisan Voting Index of R+16. The district was drawn by a bipartisan commission, as Montana law requires an independent redistricting commission, a process that was completed in November 2021. The 2024 election will be the first time Montana voters choose two House representatives since 1992. The race has drawn national attention because control of the House is expected to be very close, and this seat is almost certain to go to the Republican candidate. The primary elections in June 2024 saw Republican Troy Downing, a former state auditor, win his party's nomination, while Democrat Kevin Hamm, a businessman and former candidate for state legislature, won the Democratic nomination. Voter turnout in this district is of interest because it reflects the political engagement in a rural, conservative-leaning area, and because it can serve as a bellwether for other races in the state, including the Senate race and state-level contests. People are interested in this prediction market because it offers a way to gauge not just who wins, but how many people show up. Turnout numbers can indicate the effectiveness of campaign ground games, the impact of ballot initiatives (such as a measure to legalize recreational marijuana), and the overall enthusiasm of the electorate. For political analysts, the raw vote count is a key data point for understanding the dynamics of a newly configured district. For bettors, the market provides a liquid way to speculate on a specific numerical outcome, which is more nuanced than simply predicting the winner.

Historical Context

Montana has a long history of low population density and single-member congressional representation. From 1913 to 1992, Montana had two House seats. After the 1990 Census, the state lost one seat due to slower population growth relative to other states, dropping to a single at-large representative. That seat was held by Republicans Pat Williams (1993-1997), Rick Hill (1997-2001), Denny Rehberg (2001-2013), Steve Daines (2013-2015), Ryan Zinke (2015-2017), and Greg Gianforte (2017-2021). The 2020 Census restored the second seat, a rare event in a country where most states have lost representation over time. Voter turnout in Montana has historically been high relative to other states. In the 2020 presidential election, Montana had a turnout rate of 72.5% of eligible voters, ranking 10th highest in the nation. The 2022 midterm election saw turnout of 58.4%, which was above the national average of 52.2%. The highest turnout in a Montana House race was in 2020, when 601,000 votes were cast in the at-large race between Republican Matt Rosendale and Democrat Kathleen Williams. That race saw heavy spending and national attention, as Rosendale was a controversial figure. The creation of the 2nd district has changed the electoral geography of Montana. The 1st district, which covers the western part of the state, is more competitive, with a Cook PVI of R+8. The 2nd district is solidly Republican. In the 2022 midterm, the combined vote totals for the two districts (had they existed) would have been approximately 320,000 votes for the 2nd district and 310,000 for the 1st district, based on county-level data. This gives a baseline for what to expect in 2024, though presidential year turnout is typically 20-30% higher than midterm turnout.

Why It Matters

The voter turnout in Montana's 2nd district matters for several reasons. First, it is a data point that political strategists use to model turnout in other rural, conservative districts across the country. If turnout is high, it could signal strong Republican enthusiasm, which would have implications for the presidential race and other down-ballot contests. If turnout is low, it might indicate apathy or dissatisfaction with the Republican nominee, which could be a warning sign for the party's broader performance. For Democrats, a high turnout in a safe Republican seat could still be a positive sign if it is driven by Democratic voters, as it would suggest strong base enthusiasm. Second, the vote count has direct consequences for the state's political landscape. A high turnout election will produce a larger mandate for the winning candidate, and it will affect how the state legislature allocates resources and attention to the district. The turnout also affects the validity of ballot initiatives. In 2024, Montana has several high-profile initiatives on the ballot, including a measure to legalize recreational marijuana and a measure to establish a right to abortion in the state constitution. The total number of voters in the 2nd district will influence the overall state vote on these measures, as the district contains about 45% of the state's population. Finally, the turnout is a measure of civic health in a state that prides itself on high voter participation. Montana consistently ranks in the top 10 for voter turnout, and any decline would be noted by political observers and reformers.

Was this helpful?
Updated Jul 28, 2026

Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.

Market Insights

Average Yes Price
38¢
Kalshi
Arbitrage Opps
0
Cross-Platform
0

Trade This Market