Capbatut Petru vs. Gribcov Dmitri
PM $0
1
1
Capbatut Petru vs. Gribcov Dmitri
PM $0
1
1
AI Analysis
Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks
PM $0
Reported volume · provider units
1
Saved contracts
0
Same-question pairs
Source snapshot: Oct 21, 2026, 3:00 AM UTC
About This Event
This market refers to the table tennis match between Capbatut Petru and Gribcov Dmitri in Setka Cup Moldova Men, scheduled for July 22 at 11:30PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Capbatut Petru' if Capbatut Petru wins against Gribcov Dmitri. This market will resolve to 'Gribcov Dmitri' if Gribcov Dmitri wins against Capbatut Petru. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.
This analysis is awaiting a background update, so its prices may be older than the odds above.
Snapshot observed 2026-10-16T03:00:06.094Z. This analysis describes that snapshot and is not a live news update.
What the contract measures
The saved market covers one table tennis match, Capbatut Petru vs. Gribcov Dmitri, in the Setka Cup Moldova Men event. The contract text says it "will resolve to 'Capbatut Petru' if Capbatut Petru wins against Gribcov Dmitri" and to "'Gribcov Dmitri' if Gribcov Dmitri wins against Capbatut Petru" [1]. The match is described as "scheduled for July 22 at 11:30PM ET" [1]. That is the scheduled time recorded in the contract text, not confirmation of when the match was played.
The rules set several exceptions. A canceled, tied, or delayed match with no winner after 7 days resolves 50-50. A walkover also resolves 50-50. If a player advances because the opponent retires, defaults, or is disqualified after the match begins, the market resolves to the player who advances [1]. The primary resolution source is "the official statistics of the event," with a fallback to "a consensus of credible reporting" if final statistics are not published within 2 hours of the event's conclusion [1].
Reading the snapshot
The provider recorded both outcomes at 0.5 in a snapshot observed at 2026-10-16T03:00:06.094Z, with status "active" and a listed end time of 2026-07-30T03:59:00.000Z [1]. These are prices from that moment, not executable quotes or verified probabilities. Equal prices in this snapshot show only that the two quoted values matched at that observation time. They do not indicate which player is more likely to win.
The listed end time falls before the retrieval date of 2026-10-16. The evidence does not show whether the match was played, whether it was resolved, or what the final result was, so this record cannot establish the current state of the market.
The sample includes the single market saved for this provider event. The coverage record shows one total market, one included market, and no partial sampling [1]. Because the sample is complete for this event, no omitted outcome can be compared with these prices. The selection note refers to up to 12 markets per event, but this event contains only one.
What remains uncertain
The evidence contains no trading volume, liquidity figures, or trader counts, so the snapshot cannot indicate how active the market was. It also does not explain any price movement, and it provides no information on the match outcome, its completion status, or any statistics published afterward. Any final result would depend on the resolution source named in the contract, which is not included in the supplied evidence beyond the rule text.
References
- Polymarket: Capbatut Petru vs. Gribcov Dmitri. Provider data observed 2026-10-16T03:00:06.094Z.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
Saved Oct 16, 2026 UTCThis saved content is awaiting a background update. It may contain outdated claims; use the dated market data and provider rules for the latest available information.
Overview
This PredictPedia entry covers a Polymarket contract on a single table tennis match, Capbatut Petru vs. Gribcov Dmitri, listed under the Setka Cup Moldova Men event [1]. The contract asks which of the two players will win the match. According to the contract rules, the match was scheduled for July 22 at 11:30 PM ET, and the listed end time for the market is July 30, 2026 at 03:59 UTC [1]. A scheduled date in the rules describes the planned match, not an announced event in the present, so the match date and listed end time should be read as contract terms rather than news. The contract has two named outcomes, one for each player. It resolves to the player who wins the match [1]. The rules also set out several special cases. If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or is delayed more than 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner, the contract resolves 50-50 [1]. If a match begins but is not completed and one player advances because the opponent retires, defaults, or is disqualified, the contract resolves to the player who advances [1]. A walkover, where a player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically, also resolves 50-50 [1]. The primary resolution source is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. If those final statistics have not been published within 2 hours after the event concludes, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead [1].
Why It Matters
The contract measures which of two named players wins one scheduled table tennis match in the Setka Cup Moldova Men event [1]. Its rules define how the market settles in ordinary results and in unusual outcomes. A win by either player pays out to that player's outcome. A cancellation, tie, long delay with no winner, or walkover resolves 50-50 [1]. A retirement, default, or disqualification after the match has started resolves to the player who advances [1]. Because the primary source is official event statistics, with credible reporting as a fallback after 2 hours, the rules point to a specific method for determining the result [1].
Snapshot context
The latest published provider snapshot for this topic was observed on 2026-10-16 at 03:00 UTC. It contains listings from Polymarket. Market descriptions and listed closing times define the contracts; they do not establish that the real-world outcome has occurred. This article does not include a separately verified news update. [1]
Frequently Asked Questions
Who does the contract resolve to if the match is not finished?
If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, the contract resolves to the player who advances [1].
What happens if the match is canceled or delayed?
If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, the contract resolves 50-50 [1].
What source decides the result?
The primary resolution source is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. If final statistics are not published within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used [1].
What does a walkover do to this contract?
If a player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically, the contract resolves 50-50 [1].
AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.
Related prediction markets
Prices are catalog snapshots and may have changed. Check each market's rules and observation time.
Capbatut Petru vs. Butnaru Dumitru
PM $0Gribcov Dmitri vs. Dumitriu Vitaliy
PM $0Gribcov Dmitri vs. Butnaru Dumitru
PM $0Duplii Alexandru vs. Gribcov Dmitri
PM $0Iurcenco Iuri vs. Capbatut Petru
PM $0Levinta Iurie vs. Capbatut Petru
PM $0Market Insights
Price gaps of 2 pp+
0
Same-question pairs
0
No outcomes on this page have been reviewed as the same question on both platforms yet.
Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.