Marasek Dominik vs. Semrad Petr
PM $0
1
5
Marasek Dominik vs. Semrad Petr
PM $0
1
5
AI Analysis
Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks
PM $0
Reported volume · provider units
5
Saved contracts
0
Reviewed equivalent pairs
Source snapshot: Oct 16, 2026, 6:00 AM UTC
About This Event
This market refers to the table tennis match between Marasek Dominik and Semrad Petr in Setka Cup Czechia Men, scheduled for October 16 at 11:15AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Marasek Dominik' if Marasek Dominik wins against Semrad Petr. This market will resolve to 'Semrad Petr' if Semrad Petr wins against Marasek Dominik. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.
Snapshot observed 2026-10-16T03:00:06.094Z. This analysis describes that snapshot and is not a live news update.
What the contract measures
This snapshot covers five Polymarket contracts tied to a single table tennis match, Marasek Dominik vs. Semrad Petr, in the Setka Cup Czechia Men event. The rules describe the match as "scheduled for October 16 at 11:15AM ET" [1]. That is the schedule stated in the contract text, not confirmation of what has happened since.
The rules differ by contract type. The winner market resolves to the player who wins the match. The Total Games Over/Under 3.5 and 4.5 contracts depend on the number of games played, so they are separate questions with different thresholds. The two Game Handicap contracts each name one player at -1.5 and the other at +1.5, so they are not interchangeable. The rules also set special outcomes: a canceled match, a tie, or a delay beyond 7 days without a winner resolves 50-50, and so does a walkover [1]. Resolution relies on official event statistics, with a consensus of credible reporting used only if final statistics are not published within 2 hours after the event ends [1].
The listed end time for all five contracts is 2026-10-23T15:15:00.000Z [1]. This is a closing time in the listing, not a statement that the match will finish on that date.
Reading the snapshot
The provider observed these markets at 2026-10-16T03:00:06.094Z, and the record was retrieved at 2026-10-16T04:04:24.510Z [1]. Prices from that observation describe the saved snapshot only, not live conditions.
At observation, the Over 3.5 and Over 4.5 contracts were each priced at 0.505, with the matching Under contracts at 0.495. The winner contract and both handicap contracts were each priced at 0.5 for both sides. Each price is a snapshot value, not an executable quote or a verified probability. Because the two totals contracts use different thresholds, their Over prices should be read separately rather than as one estimate.
Only one platform appears in this sample, so there is no cross-platform comparison. The saved event shows 5 of 5 markets included, and the sample is not marked partial [1]. This establishes that the saved provider event is fully included, not that the listing covers every possible real-world outcome. The selection method ranks markets by price, then volume, and it limits each event to 12 markets. Because all five markets here were included, no omitted market is implied to be priced lower.
What remains uncertain
The evidence does not explain why any price is where it is. It also does not include trading volume, liquidity, or trader counts, so the snapshot cannot indicate how deep or active these markets are. The record does not report whether the match has started, been delayed, or been completed. Resolution cannot be assessed from this evidence, and the snapshot should not be read as a forecast of the match result.
References
- Polymarket: Marasek Dominik vs. Semrad Petr. Provider data observed 2026-10-16T03:00:06.094Z.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
Saved Oct 16, 2026 UTCOverview
PredictPedia's saved record covers a table tennis match between Marasek Dominik and Semrad Petr in the Setka Cup Czechia Men event. The provider's contract rules describe the match as scheduled for October 16 at 11:15 AM ET [1]. The rules describe how the market would resolve, but they do not report that the match has been played or what its result was. The main contract asks which player wins the match. It resolves to Marasek Dominik if he beats Semrad Petr, and to Semrad Petr if Semrad Petr beats Marasek Dominik [1]. The listed end time for the saved event is 2026-10-23T15:15:00.000Z [1]. The rules set out several outcomes that would not produce a winner. If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner being determined, the market resolves 50-50. A walkover, where a player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically, also resolves 50-50 [1]. If a match begins but is not completed, and one player advances because the opponent retires, defaults, or is disqualified, the market resolves to the player who advances [1]. The rules name official event statistics as the primary resolution source. If the governing body or event organizers have not published final statistics within 2 hours after the event concludes, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead [1]. The saved event also includes related markets. These cover total games with lines at 3.5 and 4.5, and two game handicap contracts, one with Marasek Dominik at -1.5 and one with Semrad Petr at -1.5 [1]. Each of these is a separate contract with its own outcomes.
Why It Matters
The contract measures which of two named players wins one scheduled table tennis match in the Setka Cup Czechia Men event [1]. Because it is a winner market with two outcomes, the saved prices describe how the market was priced at the time of each observation, not whether either player will win. The rules also define when the market would return 50-50 instead, such as cancellation, a tie, a long delay, or a walkover [1]. Those rules determine how a result would be settled, so readers should check them before relying on any price.
Snapshot context
The latest published provider snapshot for this topic was observed on 2026-10-16 at 03:00 UTC. It contains listings from Polymarket. Market descriptions and listed closing times define the contracts; they do not establish that the real-world outcome has occurred. This article does not include a separately verified news update. [1]
Frequently Asked Questions
Who does the match winner contract resolve to?
The contract resolves to Marasek Dominik if he wins against Semrad Petr, and to Semrad Petr if he wins against Marasek Dominik [1].
What happens if the match is canceled or not finished?
If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner, the market resolves 50-50 [1]. If the match begins but one player advances because the other retires, defaults, or is disqualified, the market resolves to the player who advances [1].
What source decides the result?
The primary source is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. If final statistics are not published within 2 hours after the event concludes, a consensus of credible reporting may be used [1].
What do the saved prices show?
The saved snapshot lists the match winner contract at 0.5 for each player, and the total games Over/Under 3.5 contract at 0.505 for Over and 0.495 for Under [1]. These are snapshot prices, not executable quotes, and they do not verify the probability of any outcome.
AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.
Market Insights
Price gaps of 2 pp+
0
Reviewed equivalent pairs
0
No currently reviewed equivalent pairs with both binary Yes prices are available.
Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.
