Skorobahatyi Yevhen vs. Efimenko Ivan
PM $0
1
5
Skorobahatyi Yevhen vs. Efimenko Ivan
PM $0
1
5
AI Analysis
Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks
PM $0
Reported volume · provider units
5
Saved contracts
0
Reviewed equivalent pairs
Source snapshot: Oct 16, 2026, 6:00 AM UTC
About This Event
This market refers to the table tennis match between Skorobahatyi Yevhen and Efimenko Ivan in Setka Cup Ukraine Men, scheduled for October 16 at 1:40PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Skorobahatyi Yevhen' if Skorobahatyi Yevhen wins against Efimenko Ivan. This market will resolve to 'Efimenko Ivan' if Efimenko Ivan wins against Skorobahatyi Yevhen. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.
Snapshot observed 2026-10-16T03:00:06.094Z. This analysis describes that snapshot and is not a live news update.
What the contract measures
This sample covers a single table tennis match, Skorobahatyi Yevhen vs. Efimenko Ivan, in the Setka Cup Ukraine Men event. The source describes the match as "scheduled for October 16 at 1:40PM ET" [1]. The five Polymarket markets in the sample are a winner market, two game-total markets (Over/Under 3.5 and 4.5), and two game-handicap markets. The two handicap markets use the same players but name the favorite differently, so they should be read as separate contracts.
The rules set several special cases. The market resolves 50-50 if the match is canceled, ends in a tie, is delayed beyond 7 days without a winner, or is a walkover [1]. If a player advances because the opponent retires, defaults, or is disqualified, the market resolves to the player who advances [1]. The primary resolution source is "the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers," with a "consensus of credible reporting" used only if final statistics are not published within 2 hours after the event's conclusion [1].
Reading the snapshot
The provider observed these prices at 2026-10-16T03:00:06.094Z, and the source was retrieved at 2026-10-16T04:08:16.625Z [1]. These are snapshots from that observation time, not current or executable quotes.
At that observation, the winner contract was priced at 0.5 for each player. The Over 3.5 and Over 4.5 game totals were each priced at 0.505, with Under at 0.495 [1]. Both handicap markets also showed 0.5 for each side. The sample is complete for this event: all five saved markets are included and the sample is not marked as partial [1]. That completeness applies only to the saved provider event. The source notes that this "does not establish that the providers list every possible real-world outcome" [1].
No other platform's prices are in the evidence, so no cross-platform comparison is possible.
What remains uncertain
The listed end time for all five markets is 2026-10-23T17:40:00.000Z [1]. This is the contract's listed close time, not the match date, and it does not establish when the match will be completed or when the result will be known.
The evidence does not show any trading volume, liquidity, or number of participants, so these prices cannot be read as depth or consensus. The evidence also does not explain why the prices are at these levels. Any change after the observation time is not reflected here.
References
- Polymarket: Skorobahatyi Yevhen vs. Efimenko Ivan. Provider data observed 2026-10-16T03:00:06.094Z.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
Saved Oct 16, 2026 UTCOverview
This PredictPedia entry covers a set of prediction-market contracts tied to a men's table tennis match between Skorobahatyi Yevhen and Efimenko Ivan. The contract text describes the match as taking place in the Setka Cup Ukraine Men event and says it is scheduled for October 16 at 1:40PM ET [1]. That scheduled time comes from the contract rules and should not be read as a separately confirmed event announcement. The saved event includes five markets. One asks which player wins the match. Two are handicap markets, each giving one player a 1.5 game spread in opposite directions. The other two are total games markets, with thresholds of 3.5 and 4.5 games, each split into Over and Under outcomes [1]. Each market lists an end date of October 23, 2026 at 17:40 UTC, and the provider marks the event as active [1]. The saved prices for the match winner and both handicap markets are 0.50 for each side. The 3.5 and 4.5 game markets show 0.505 for Over and 0.495 for Under [1]. These are snapshot values from the provider, not executable quotes or verified probabilities, and they do not indicate who is expected to win or how the match is likely to unfold.
Why It Matters
The match-winner contract resolves to whichever player wins the match, according to the rules in the saved event text [1]. The handicap contracts apply a 1.5 game spread to each player, and the total games contracts ask whether the match finishes above or below 3.5 or 4.5 games [1]. These contracts therefore depend on the official result and game-level statistics of the match rather than on any other measure. The contract also sets out what happens in unusual situations. If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or is delayed more than 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner, the market resolves 50-50. A walkover, where one player withdraws before the start, also resolves 50-50. If a match begins but is not completed because a player retires, is defaulted, or is disqualified, the market resolves to the player who advances [1]. The primary resolution source is the official statistics published by the governing body or event organizers. If those final statistics are not published within 2 hours after the event concludes, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead [1].
Snapshot context
The latest published provider snapshot for this topic was observed on 2026-10-16 at 03:00 UTC. It contains listings from Polymarket. Market descriptions and listed closing times define the contracts; they do not establish that the real-world outcome has occurred. This article does not include a separately verified news update. [1]
Frequently Asked Questions
What determines how the match-winner contract resolves?
It resolves to the player who wins the match against the other player named in the contract [1].
What happens if the match is not played?
If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner, the contract resolves 50-50. A walkover also resolves 50-50 [1].
What happens if one player retires after the match starts?
If the match begins but is not completed and one player advances because the opponent retires, is defaulted, or is disqualified, the contract resolves to the player who advances [1].
What source is used to settle these contracts?
The primary source is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. If those are not published within 2 hours after the event concludes, a consensus of credible reporting may be used [1].
Do the listed prices show the likely outcome?
No. The prices are provider snapshot values and are not executable quotes or verified probabilities [1].
AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.
Market Insights
Price gaps of 2 pp+
0
Reviewed equivalent pairs
0
No currently reviewed equivalent pairs with both binary Yes prices are available.
Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.
