
Arizona vs Seattle: Passing Touchdowns
K 15.7K contracts
1
7
Arizona vs Seattle: Passing Touchdowns

K 15.7K contracts
1
7
Current odds
Snapshot from
As of Nov 8, 2026, 6:00 PM UTC, the highest-priced outcome on Kalshi is Drew Lock: 1+ at 80.5%.
Kalshi
- Drew Lock: 1+80.5%
- Gardner Minshew II: 1+64.5%
- Drew Lock: 2+48.5%
- Gardner Minshew II: 2+27.5%
- Drew Lock: 3+19%
Yes prices. They are not order quotes; check each platform's rules, fees and live prices before trading.
AI Analysis
Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks
K 15.7K contracts
Reported volume ยท provider units
7
Saved contracts
0
Same-question pairs
Source snapshot: Nov 8, 2026, 6:00 PM UTC
About This Event
ARI vs SEA (Nov 8) If Drew Lock records X passing touchdowns in the Arizona vs Seattle Pro Football game originally scheduled for Nov 8, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes. The following market refers to Drew Lock in the Arizona vs Seattle Pro Football game originally scheduled for Nov 8, 2026. If Drew Lock is active but does not appear in any live play, the market settles to the fair market price before game start. Once Drew Lock appears in at least one live play, even if nullified by penalty, the market settles based on passing touchdowns recorded. Kalshi is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the Governing League. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners. This market will close and expire early if the event occurs.
This analysis is awaiting a background update, so its prices may be older than the odds above.
Snapshot observed 2026-11-07T12:00:06.749Z. This analysis describes that snapshot and is not a live news update.
What the contract measures
The saved event is a single Kalshi event for the Arizona vs Seattle game, which was "originally scheduled for Nov 8, 2026" [1]. Each market asks whether a named quarterback reaches a passing touchdown threshold. The Drew Lock markets resolve Yes if he records the stated number of passing touchdowns, and the Gardner Minshew II markets use the same structure [1].
The rules include settlement details that affect how a reader should interpret the contracts. If a player is active but never appears in a live play, "the market settles to the fair market price before game start" [1]. Once a player appears in a live play, "the market settles based on passing touchdowns recorded," even if a play is "nullified by penalty" [1]. The market "will close and expire early if the event occurs" [1].
The provider lists the event as active, and its excerpt states "Listed end time: not supplied" [1]. The market records carry an endDate of 2026-11-10T21:25:00Z, but that field is a provider close time, not a confirmed game time or resolution time.
Reading the snapshot
The prices come from an observation at 2026-11-07T12:00:06Z, while the evidence was retrieved at 2026-11-07T19:41:59Z [1]. These values describe that earlier snapshot only. They are not live quotes and should not be treated as executable prices or verified probabilities.
Within this snapshot, the Yes prices were: Drew Lock 1+ at 0.815, Gardner Minshew II 1+ at 0.65, Drew Lock 2+ at 0.485, Gardner Minshew II 2+ at 0.285, Drew Lock 3+ at 0.195, Gardner Minshew II 3+ at 0.07, and Drew Lock 4+ at 0.045 [1]. Higher thresholds carry lower Yes prices, which matches the wording of each contract. The sample covers one platform only, and no cross-platform comparison is possible from this evidence.
Volume is not included in the excerpt, so these prices cannot be read as liquidity or as a count of traders.
What remains uncertain
The coverage record reports 7 total markets and 7 included markets, with no partial sample [1]. That supports reading this as the complete saved set for this provider event. It does not show that the provider lists every possible outcome in the real game, so omitted outcomes should not be assumed to be less likely.
The evidence does not explain why any price is at its level, does not report recent team or player news, and does not establish any historical accuracy. It also does not confirm the actual number of passing touchdowns or whether the game was played as scheduled. Readers should check the provider's current rules and status before drawing conclusions.
References
- Kalshi: Arizona vs Seattle: Passing Touchdowns. Provider data observed 2026-11-07T12:00:06.749Z.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
Saved Nov 7, 2026 UTCAI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.
Related prediction markets
Prices are catalog snapshots and may have changed. Check each market's rules and observation time.

Cardinals vs. Seahawks - Player Props
PM $3.9K
Arizona vs Seattle: Passing Touchdowns
K 154.21 contracts
Utah vs. Arizona
PM $8
Arizona State vs. UCF
PM $0
Seattle: Team Specials
K 10.7K contracts
Arizona vs Seattle: Passing Yards
K 0 contractsMarket Insights
Price gaps of 2 pp+
0
Same-question pairs
0
No outcomes on this page have been reviewed as the same question on both platforms yet.
Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.
