Molochko Anton vs. Hryban Vadym
PM $0
1
1
Molochko Anton vs. Hryban Vadym
PM $0
1
1
AI Analysis
Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks
PM $0
Reported volume · provider units
1
Saved contracts
0
Same-question pairs
Source snapshot: Oct 24, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
About This Event
This market refers to the table tennis match between Molochko Anton and Hryban Vadym in Setka Cup Ukraine Men, scheduled for August 3 at 8:35AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Molochko Anton' if Molochko Anton wins against Hryban Vadym. This market will resolve to 'Hryban Vadym' if Hryban Vadym wins against Molochko Anton. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.
This analysis is awaiting a background update, so its prices may be older than the odds above.
Snapshot observed 2026-10-19T00:00:05.826Z. This analysis describes that snapshot and is not a live news update.
What the contract measures
This snapshot covers one market, "Molochko Anton vs. Hryban Vadym," on Polymarket, a table tennis match in the Setka Cup Ukraine Men event [1]. The market resolves to "Molochko Anton" if that player wins and to "Hryban Vadym" if that player wins [1]. The rules also set 50-50 outcomes for several cases. These include a canceled match, a tie, a delay beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner, and a walkover [1]. If a player advances because the opponent retires, defaults, or is disqualified, the market resolves to the player who advances [1].
The rules name the resolution source as "the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers." If those statistics are not published within 2 hours after the event ends, "a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead" [1]. The listed end time is 2026-08-11T03:59:00.000Z [1]. The excerpt gives the scheduled match time as August 3 at 8:35AM ET but does not state a year, so the listed end time should be read as the contract's own field, not as a confirmed event date.
Reading the snapshot
The provider observation time is 2026-10-19T00:00:05.826Z, and the source was retrieved at 2026-10-19T00:58:50.401Z [1]. These are the times for this record. The prices shown describe that observation, not the present.
Both outcomes are priced at 0.5 in the saved record [1]. This is a snapshot of a quoted price, not an executable quote or a verified probability. The record does not show trade size, depth, or the number of participants, so it cannot indicate how easily a position could be entered or exited.
The sample covers one saved market. The coverage record marks it as complete for this event, with one market included out of one total, and the partial sample flag is false [1]. The selection note says the set includes all saved markets for the event, but it "does not establish that the providers list every possible real-world outcome" [1]. With only two named outcomes in this record, the comparison is limited to these two contracts.
What remains uncertain
The evidence does not show whether the match has been played, whether a winner has been determined, or how the market has resolved. The excerpt describes the contract status as active at the time of the saved record [1]. Because the listed end time falls before the observation time, a reader should check the current provider status before drawing any conclusion from this snapshot.
No other platform's contract is included, so no cross-platform comparison is possible from this evidence.
References
- Polymarket: Molochko Anton vs. Hryban Vadym. Provider data observed 2026-10-19T00:00:05.826Z.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
Saved Oct 19, 2026 UTCThis saved content is awaiting a background update. It may contain outdated claims; use the dated market data and provider rules for the latest available information.
Overview
This PredictPedia entry covers a two-outcome contract on one table tennis match between Molochko Anton and Hryban Vadym, part of the Setka Cup Ukraine Men event. The contract is listed on Polymarket and is categorized as a sports market [1]. The contract resolves to the player who wins the match. If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner, it resolves to 50-50. A walkover, where one player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically, also resolves 50-50. If a match begins but one player advances because the opponent retires, defaults, or is disqualified, the contract resolves to the player who advances [1]. The rules name a scheduled date of August 3 at 8:35 AM ET and list an end time of 2026-08-11 03:59 UTC [1]. These dates appear in the contract terms. They do not establish when the match was played or what its result was. The saved snapshot was observed on 19 October 2026, when the provider listed the market as active [1]. Because that observation falls after both the scheduled date and the listed end time, this entry cannot report the match outcome or confirm whether the contract has settled. Resolution relies on official statistics published by the governing body or event organizers. If those statistics are not published within two hours after the event concludes, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead [1]. The saved prices are 0.50 for each player [1]. These are snapshot values, not executable quotes, and they are not verified probabilities of either player winning.
Why It Matters
The contract measures which of two named players wins one scheduled table tennis match under the stated rules [1]. Its fallback conditions cover cancellations, ties, long delays, walkovers, and retirements or disqualifications, so the terms determine how a non-standard result settles [1]. Readers should review those conditions before interpreting the saved prices, since a price on its own does not describe how the contract will settle.
Snapshot context
The latest published provider snapshot for this topic was observed on 2026-10-19 at 00:00 UTC. It contains listings from Polymarket. Market descriptions and listed closing times define the contracts; they do not establish that the real-world outcome has occurred. This article does not include a separately verified news update. [1]
Frequently Asked Questions
How does the contract settle if the match is canceled?
If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner, the contract resolves to 50-50 [1].
What source determines the result?
The primary source is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. If those are not published within 2 hours after the event concludes, a consensus of credible reporting may be used [1].
What happens if one player retires during the match?
If a match begins but is not completed and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, the contract resolves to the player who advances [1].
Does a price of 0.50 mean each player has a 50 percent chance of winning?
No. The saved price is a snapshot from the observation time, not an executable quote or a verified probability [1].
AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.
Related prediction markets
Prices are catalog snapshots and may have changed. Check each market's rules and observation time.
Shypilov Anton vs. Mitla Oleksii
PM $0Bezpalyi Vadym vs. Sideltsev Sergii
PM $0Bezpalyi Vadym vs. Shulhachyk Pavlo
PM $0Dubinin Ihor vs. Bezpalyi Vadym
PM $0Bezpalyi Vadym vs. Pohorilyi Mykola
PM $0
Montreal vs Chicago: Goals
K 91.5K contractsMarket Insights
Price gaps of 2 pp+
0
Same-question pairs
0
No outcomes on this page have been reviewed as the same question on both platforms yet.
Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.