
Fashchevskyi Ivan vs. Rodin Oleksii
PM $0
1
1
Fashchevskyi Ivan vs. Rodin Oleksii

PM $0
1
1
AI Analysis
Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks
PM $0
Reported volume ยท provider units
1
Saved contracts
0
Same-question pairs
Source snapshot: Oct 21, 2026, 6:00 AM UTC
About This Event
This market refers to the table tennis match between Fashchevskyi Ivan and Rodin Oleksii in Setka Cup Ukraine Men, scheduled for August 15 at 10:30PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Fashchevskyi Ivan' if Fashchevskyi Ivan wins against Rodin Oleksii. This market will resolve to 'Rodin Oleksii' if Rodin Oleksii wins against Fashchevskyi Ivan. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.
This analysis is awaiting a background update, so its prices may be older than the odds above.
Snapshot observed 2026-10-16T00:00:06.034Z. This analysis describes that snapshot and is not a live news update.
What the contract measures
This Polymarket contract covers a table tennis match between Fashchevskyi Ivan and Rodin Oleksii in Setka Cup Ukraine Men, which the rules describe as "scheduled for August 15 at 10:30PM ET" [1]. The market resolves to "Fashchevskyi Ivan" if that player wins, and to "Rodin Oleksii" if that player wins [1].
The rules also set several special cases. The market resolves 50-50 if the match is canceled, ends in a tie, is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner, or ends in a walkover [1]. If a match begins but is not completed and one player advances due to retirement, default, or disqualification, the market resolves to the player who advances [1]. The primary resolution source is "the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers," with a "consensus of credible reporting" used only if final statistics are not published within 2 hours after the event concludes [1].
Reading the snapshot
The saved snapshot was observed at 2026-10-16T00:00:06Z and retrieved at 2026-10-16T00:31:47Z [1]. It lists two outcomes, each priced at 0.5, with the market status shown as active [1]. These are snapshot prices for that observation time only. They are not executable quotes, and they are not verified probabilities.
The listed end time is 2026-08-23T03:59:00Z [1]. That is earlier than the retrieval time in this snapshot, so the listed end time has already passed relative to the retrieval time, even though the provider reported the status as active at observation. The evidence does not explain this discrepancy.
Because there is only one market in this saved event, no comparison with other contracts or platforms is possible. The equal prices show only that both outcomes were quoted at 0.5 in this snapshot. They do not indicate anything about the match itself.
What remains uncertain
The evidence does not show whether the match was played, canceled, or completed, and it does not show any result or resolution. The excerpt gives the scheduled date as August 15 without a year, so the event year should be confirmed from the official listing.
The sample is complete for this saved event: one market, with no omitted markets [1]. The source also states that this "does not establish that the providers list every possible real-world outcome" [1]. For a match with two named players, the two listed outcomes cover the contract rules, but the evidence does not describe any other source or outcome.
The evidence contains no information on trading volume, liquidity, or the number of participants, and no explanation for any price movement.
References
- Polymarket: Fashchevskyi Ivan vs. Rodin Oleksii. Provider data observed 2026-10-16T00:00:06.034Z.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
Saved Oct 16, 2026 UTCThis saved content is awaiting a background update. It may contain outdated claims; use the dated market data and provider rules for the latest available information.
Overview
This is a binary contract on a table tennis match between Fashchevskyi Ivan and Rodin Oleksii, listed on Polymarket in the Setka Cup Ukraine Men event [1]. The contract states that the match was scheduled for August 15 at 10:30 PM ET, and it lists an end time of August 23, 2026 at 03:59 UTC [1]. The listed end time is a contract field, not a report that the match took place on that date or that a result was reached. The market has two outcomes, one for each player. It resolves to Fashchevskyi Ivan if he wins and to Rodin Oleksii if he wins [1]. In the snapshot retrieved for this record, each outcome showed a price of 0.5 [1]. That figure is a snapshot of the displayed price at the time of observation. It is not an executable quote, and it is not a verified probability that either player wins. The contract includes several special cases. If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner, the market resolves 50-50 [1]. If the match begins but is not completed and one player advances because the opponent retires, defaults, or is disqualified, the market resolves to the player who advances [1]. A walkover, where a player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically, also resolves 50-50 [1]. The primary resolution source is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers [1]. If those final statistics are not published within 2 hours after the event concludes, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead [1].
Why It Matters
The contract measures which of the two named players is determined to win the scheduled table tennis match under the stated rules [1]. Its rules separate a normal win from several edge cases, including retirement, default, disqualification, walkover, cancellation, tie, and extended delay, each with its own resolution treatment [1]. Because the outcome depends on the official statistics or the fallback reporting described in the rules, the wording of the resolution source is central to how the market settles [1].
Snapshot context
The latest published provider snapshot for this topic was observed on 2026-10-16 at 00:00 UTC. It contains listings from Polymarket. Market descriptions and listed closing times define the contracts; they do not establish that the real-world outcome has occurred. This article does not include a separately verified news update. [1]
Frequently Asked Questions
Who does this market resolve to if the match is completed normally?
It resolves to Fashchevskyi Ivan if he wins against Rodin Oleksii, and to Rodin Oleksii if he wins against Fashchevskyi Ivan [1].
What happens if the match is canceled or not played?
If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, the market resolves 50-50 [1].
What happens if one player retires or is disqualified after the match begins?
If the match begins but is not completed and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, the market resolves to the player who advances [1].
What source is used to decide the result?
The primary source is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. If those are not published within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead [1].
AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.
Related prediction markets
Prices are catalog snapshots and may have changed. Check each market's rules and observation time.

Fashchevskyi Ivan vs. Pytsko Ivan
PM $0
Storozhenko Oleksandr vs. Fashchevskyi Ivan
PM $0
Fashchevskyi Ivan vs. Slozka Mykola
PM $0
Fashchevskyi Ivan vs. Tebenko Yaroslav
PM $0
Shchegelskyi Dmytro vs. Rodin Oleksii
PM $0
Parahailo Yurii vs. Rodin Oleksii
PM $0Market Insights
Price gaps of 2 pp+
0
Same-question pairs
0
No outcomes on this page have been reviewed as the same question on both platforms yet.
Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.