Kocvara Martin vs. Hlavacek Tomas
PM $0
1
5
Kocvara Martin vs. Hlavacek Tomas
PM $0
1
5
AI Analysis
Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks
PM $0
Reported volume · provider units
5
Saved contracts
0
Reviewed equivalent pairs
Source snapshot: Oct 16, 2026, 6:00 AM UTC
About This Event
This market refers to the table tennis match between Kocvara Martin and Hlavacek Tomas in Setka Cup Czechia Men, scheduled for October 16 at 3:45AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Kocvara Martin' if Kocvara Martin wins against Hlavacek Tomas. This market will resolve to 'Hlavacek Tomas' if Hlavacek Tomas wins against Kocvara Martin. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.
Snapshot observed 2026-10-16T03:00:06.094Z. This analysis describes that snapshot and is not a live news update.
What the contract measures
The evidence covers one Polymarket event, Kocvara Martin vs. Hlavacek Tomas, a table tennis match in the Setka Cup Czechia Men competition, scheduled for October 16 at 3:45AM ET [1]. The head-to-head contract "will resolve to 'Kocvara Martin' if Kocvara Martin wins against Hlavacek Tomas," with the reverse case resolving to 'Hlavacek Tomas' [1]. The rules state that a canceled match, a tie, or a delay beyond 7 days without a winner resolves to 50-50, and a walkover also resolves to 50-50 [1]. If a match begins but is not completed and one player advances due to retirement, default, or disqualification, the market resolves to that player [1].
The other four contracts are game-count and handicap markets. Two total games contracts ask whether the match goes over or under 3.5 games and over or under 4.5 games. Two handicap contracts list each player with a plus or minus 1.5 game adjustment [1]. Each contract's listed end time is 2026-10-23T07:45:00.000Z [1]. This is a listed close time in the provider data, not a record of when the match was played or resolved.
Reading the snapshot
The provider observed these prices at 2026-10-16T03:00:06.094Z, and the source was retrieved at 2026-10-16T04:04:36.822Z [1]. These are different timestamps, and both describe a saved record rather than a live view. The prices should not be read as current.
The head-to-head contract shows 0.5 for each player. The total games contracts show Over at 0.505 and Under at 0.495 for both the 3.5 and 4.5 lines [1]. The handicap contracts also show 0.5 on each side [1]. These are snapshot prices, not executable quotes or verified probabilities. Each contract asks a different question, so their prices should not be averaged, combined, or compared with other platforms as if they measured the same outcome.
The sample includes all five saved markets for this event, with marketCoverage showing 5 of 5 included and partialSample set to false [1]. The provider warning notes that this does not establish that every possible real-world outcome is listed [1].
What remains uncertain
The evidence does not show whether the match has started, finished, or been resolved after the observation time. It contains no final statistics, post-match reporting, or explanation for any price. The rules name official event statistics as the primary resolution source and allow consensus reporting if final statistics are not published within 2 hours after the event concludes [1]. Whether that condition applies is not established by this evidence.
References
- Polymarket: Kocvara Martin vs. Hlavacek Tomas. Provider data observed 2026-10-16T03:00:06.094Z.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
Saved Oct 16, 2026 UTCOverview
This PredictPedia entry covers a Polymarket contract on a table tennis match between Kocvara Martin and Hlavacek Tomas, part of the Setka Cup Czechia Men competition [1]. The provider describes the match as scheduled for October 16 at 3:45AM ET, which is 07:45 UTC [1]. The contract is a two-outcome market: it resolves to Kocvara Martin if he wins the match, and to Hlavacek Tomas if he wins [1]. The scheduled time is a date in the provider's rules and listing, not a confirmed record that the match was played at that time. The contract also sets out what happens in unusual situations. If the match is canceled without being played, ends in a tie, or is delayed more than 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner, the market resolves 50-50 [1]. If a match begins but is not completed, and one player advances because the opponent retires, defaults, or is disqualified, the market resolves to the player who advances [1]. A walkover, where a player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically, also resolves 50-50 [1]. The main resolution source is the official statistics published by the governing body or event organizers [1]. If those final statistics are not published within 2 hours after the event concludes, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead [1]. The listed end time for the contract is 2026-10-23 07:45 UTC, and the provider lists the market as active [1]. The saved event includes five markets: the match winner, two total games markets (over or under 3.5 games and over or under 4.5 games), and two game handicap markets, one favoring each player by 1.5 games [1]. Because the saved event contains all five markets it covers, the list describes this event's market set. It does not describe every possible bet that could exist on the match.
Why It Matters
The contract measures which of the two named players wins this specific table tennis match, as defined by the provider's rules [1]. The other markets in the same event are tied to the number of games played or to game handicaps, so they depend on the match's game-level results rather than only the winner [1]. The rules matter because they decide how cancellations, ties, walkovers, and early finishes are settled. Those cases can resolve to 50-50 or to the player who advances, rather than to a straight win [1]. The resolution source also determines which statistics are used, with a fallback to credible reporting if official figures are not published within 2 hours [1].
Snapshot context
The latest published provider snapshot for this topic was observed on 2026-10-16 at 03:00 UTC. It contains listings from Polymarket. Market descriptions and listed closing times define the contracts; they do not establish that the real-world outcome has occurred. This article does not include a separately verified news update. [1]
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if the match is canceled or postponed?
If the match is not played at all, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner, the market resolves 50-50 [1].
What if one player retires or is disqualified during the match?
If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances because the opponent retires, defaults, or is disqualified, the market resolves to the player who advances [1].
Which source decides the result?
The primary source is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. If those are not published within 2 hours after the event concludes, a consensus of credible reporting may be used [1].
AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.
Market Insights
Price gaps of 2 pp+
0
Reviewed equivalent pairs
0
No currently reviewed equivalent pairs with both binary Yes prices are available.
Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.
