Skip to main content
Market snapshot: . Prices may have changed since this snapshot.
Events
GroupKALSHI

Washington vs San Francisco: Receiving Yards Escalator

Washington vs San Francisco: Receiving Yards Escalator
Vol

K 0 contracts

|
Events

1

|
Markets

3

AI Analysis

Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks

K 0 contracts

Reported volume · provider units

3

Saved contracts

0

Reviewed equivalent pairs

Source snapshot: Oct 18, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

About This Event

WAS vs SF (Oct 19) If Each Yes contract pays per receiving yards X vs San Francisco Pro Football game originally scheduled for Oct 19, 2026. Each 10 receiving yards increase the payout by the following schedule: 0–9 yards, $0.0000; 10–19, $0.0001; 20–29, $0.0010; 30–39, $0.0033; 40–49, $0.0080; 50–59, $0.0156; 60–69, $0.0270; 70–79, $0.0428; 80–89, $0.0640; 90–99, $0.0911; 100–109, $0.1250; 110–119, $0.1663; 120–129, $0.2160; 130–139, $0.2746; 140–149, $0.3430; 150–159, $0.4218; 160–169, $0.5120; 170–179, $0.6141; 180–189, $0.7290; 190–199, $0.8573; and 200 or more, $1.0000. Each No contract pays $1.00 minus the Yes payout. Yes pays out at most $1.00. Then the market resolves to Yes. This is a scalar market. The Yes payout per contract shown above follows this calculation: Payout Formula = floor, 10000 x, y / 200, ^3, / 10000 y = min, 200, max, 0, 10 x floor, s / 10, , , s = official receiving yards The No payout is $1.00 minus the Yes payout. Negative receiving yard totals pay Yes $0.00. Kalshi is not affiliated, associated, authorized, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the Governing League. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners. This market may close and expire early if the event occurs.

AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.

AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.

Prices are catalog snapshots and may have changed. Check each market's rules and observation time.

PolymarketSports
Commanders vs. 49ers - Player Props

Commanders vs. 49ers - Player Props

PM $1.5K
Chig Okonkwo: Anytime TouchdownYes 50%
Brock Purdy: Team First TD (San Francisco 49ers)Yes 50%
Chig Okonkwo: Team First TD (Washington Commanders)Yes 50%
+164 moreNext deadline Oct 20, 2026 UTC
KalshiSports
Washington vs San Francisco: Receiving Yards

Washington vs San Francisco: Receiving Yards

K 6.3K contracts
Christian McCaffrey: 15+ receiving yardsYes 83.5%
Terry McLaurin: 15+ receiving yardsYes 82%
Mike Evans: 40+ receiving yardsYes 79%
+62 moreNext deadline Oct 22, 2026 UTC
KalshiSports
Washington vs San Francisco: Receiving Yards (Protected)

Washington vs San Francisco: Receiving Yards (Protected)

K 32.26 contracts
Terry McLaurin: 15+ receiving yards (Protected)Yes 86.5%
Christian McCaffrey: 15+ receiving yards (Protected)Yes 81.5%
Mike Evans: 40+ receiving yards (Protected)Yes 77.5%
+62 moreNext deadline Oct 22, 2026 UTC
KalshiSports
Washington vs San Francisco: Most Receiving Yards

Washington vs San Francisco: Most Receiving Yards

K 55 contracts
George Kittle: most receiving yards in the WAS vs SF gameYes 18.5%
Terry McLaurin: most receiving yards in the WAS vs SF gameYes 12%
Christian McCaffrey: most receiving yards in the WAS vs SF gameYes 10%
+4 moreNext deadline Nov 3, 2026 UTC
KalshiSports
Washington vs San Francisco: Team Total Yards

Washington vs San Francisco: Team Total Yards

K 0 contracts
San Francisco: 250+ Total YardsYes 77.5%
Washington: 250+ Total YardsYes 71%
San Francisco: 300+ Total YardsYes 64.5%
+7 moreNext deadline Oct 22, 2026 UTC
KalshiSports
Washington vs San Francisco: Rushing + Receiving Yards

Washington vs San Francisco: Rushing + Receiving Yards

K 137.23 contracts
Christian McCaffrey: 100+ rushing and receiving yards combinedYes 56%
Rachaad White: 60+ rushing and receiving yards combinedYes 49%
Rachaad White: 85+ rushing and receiving yards combinedYes 35.5%
+3 moreNext deadline Oct 22, 2026 UTC

Market Insights

Price gaps of 2 pp+

0

Reviewed equivalent pairs

0

No currently reviewed equivalent pairs with both binary Yes prices are available.

Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.

Trade This Market