Skip to main content
Market snapshot: . Prices may have changed since this snapshot.
Events
GroupKALSHIPOLYMARKETCross-Platform

British Columbia general election: 3rd place

British Columbia general election: 3rd place
Vol

PM $5.7K · K 35.4K contracts

|
Events

2

|
Markets

10

AI Analysis

Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks

PM $5.7K · K 35.4K contracts

Reported volume · provider units

10

Saved contracts

0

Reviewed equivalent pairs

Source snapshot: Oct 17, 2026, 6:00 AM UTC

About This Event

On Oct 24, 2026 If X finishes in 3rd place in the 2026 British Columbia general election according to the certified results, then the market resolves to Yes. Ranking is determined by the specified counting method: For plurality voting: rank is based on province-wide certified valid-vote count or percentage, not seats won In case of exact ties, markets resolve proportionally, 1/number of tied entities, rounded down. If no listed party is tied for third and an unlisted party finishes third, every named market resolves NO. Parties that withdraw or are disqualified after the filing deadline but remain on the ballot are ranked based on votes received. Resolution uses the final certified result from Elections BC, not the preliminary election-night count. This market will close and expire early if certified election results are published.

This saved analysis is awaiting a background update. Its prices and claims may be outdated; compare them with the dated market data above.

Snapshot observed 2026-10-16T00:00:06.034Z. This analysis describes that snapshot and is not a live news update.

What the contract measures

The supplied source is a Kalshi event asking which party will finish third in the 2026 British Columbia general election. Each market resolves to Yes if its named party finishes third "according to the certified results" [1]. The rules say ranking uses "province-wide certified valid-vote count or percentage, not seats won," and that "Resolution uses the final certified result from Elections BC, not the preliminary election-night count" [1]. Exact ties split payment "proportionally, 1/number of tied entities, rounded down" [1]. If an unlisted party finishes third, "every named market resolves NO" [1].

The rules also state "On Oct 24, 2026," but that is a contract date, not a confirmed announcement of when results will be published. The market records show an end date of 2027-10-24, while the source states "Listed end time: not supplied" [1]. Treat the closing time as unresolved in this evidence.

Reading the snapshot

The observation time is 2026-10-16T00:00:06Z, and the source was retrieved at 2026-10-16T00:22:25Z [1]. These are prices from that snapshot only, not live quotes or executable prices, and they are not verified probabilities.

The saved event includes five markets: BC Greens at Yes 0.965, BC NDP at 0.02, OneBC at 0.01, CentreBC at 0.01, and BC Conservatives at 0.005 [1]. The sample is complete for this saved event (five of five markets, not a partial sample). The Yes prices sum to 1.01, which is consistent with rounding and fees but is not a verified probability distribution. The sample ordering reflects the selection rules, not a ranking of likelihood across different events.

What remains uncertain

The provider does not establish that these five parties are every possible outcome, and the rules leave room for an unlisted party to finish third. The event may close early if certified results are published [1]. The excerpt does not supply the provider's listed end time, so the timing of final resolution cannot be confirmed from this evidence. The evidence also contains no explanation for why prices are where they are, no trader counts, and no information about liquidity or trading activity. Price differences between markets reflect different contracts and should not be read as an arbitrage opportunity.

References

  1. Kalshi: British Columbia general election: 3rd place. Provider data observed 2026-10-16T00:00:06.034Z.

AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.

Saved Oct 16, 2026 UTC

Overview

This contract asks whether a specific party will finish third in the 2026 British Columbia general election. The contract rules state that if the named party finishes 3rd in the election according to the certified results, the market resolves to Yes [1]. The Kalshi event groups five separate markets under one title, each asking about a different party: BC Greens, BC NDP, OneBC, CentreBC, and BC Conservatives [1]. Each market is a separate yes or no question, so a party's contract is not linked to the others by the rules shown here. The rules define finishing third by vote count rather than seats. Ranking is based on the province-wide certified valid-vote count or percentage, not on seats won, under plurality voting [1]. The rules also address ties. In an exact tie, markets resolve proportionally, with each tied entity receiving 1 divided by the number of tied entities, rounded down [1]. Parties that withdraw or are disqualified after the filing deadline but remain on the ballot are ranked by the votes they received [1]. An important condition concerns parties not listed in the contract. If no listed party is tied for third and an unlisted party finishes third, every named market resolves No [1]. This means a Yes outcome requires one of the named parties to be the third-ranked party, and a result involving an unlisted party in third place settles all five markets to No under the stated rules [1].

Historical Context

The 2017 British Columbia general election was held on May 9, 2017, to elect 87 members to the Legislative Assembly. Before that election, the British Columbia Liberal Party formed the government under Christy Clark, while the NDP formed the Official Opposition, and the Green Party had one MLA, who later became its leader [3]. The 2024 British Columbia general election was held on October 19, 2024, to elect 93 members of the Legislative Assembly [2]. These earlier elections provide background on the legislature, but the supplied sources do not report results for the 2026 election.

Why It Matters

The contract measures the final placement of named parties in the 2026 British Columbia general election, using province-wide certified vote totals [1]. Because the ranking is by votes rather than seats, a party's third-place finish depends on its vote count relative to the other parties on the ballot [1]. The rules also set how ties, withdrawn or disqualified candidates, and unlisted parties are handled, which affects how each market settles [1]. Traders evaluating these contracts need to read the resolution rules closely, since the source specifies that preliminary counts do not decide the outcome [1].

Snapshot context

The latest published provider snapshot for this topic was observed on 2026-10-16 at 00:00 UTC. It contains listings from Kalshi. Market descriptions and listed closing times define the contracts; they do not establish that the real-world outcome has occurred. This article does not include a separately verified news update. [1]

Frequently Asked Questions

Which result decides whether a market resolves to Yes?

The market resolves using the final certified result from Elections BC, not the preliminary election-night count [1].

How is third place determined?

Ranking is based on the province-wide certified valid-vote count or percentage, not seats won [1].

What happens if two parties are tied for third?

In an exact tie, markets resolve proportionally, with each tied entity receiving 1 divided by the number of tied entities, rounded down [1].

What happens if a party not named in the contract finishes third?

If no listed party is tied for third and an unlisted party finishes third, every named market resolves No [1].

Can the market close before the final result?

The market will close and expire early if certified election results are published [1].

Was this helpful?
Saved Oct 16, 2026 UTC

AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.

Market Insights

Price gaps of 2 pp+

0

Reviewed equivalent pairs

0

No currently reviewed equivalent pairs with both binary Yes prices are available.

Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.