Skip to main content
Market snapshot: . Prices may have changed since this snapshot.
Events
GroupPOLYMARKET

Daniel Dubois vs. Fabio Wardley

Daniel Dubois vs. Fabio Wardley
Vol

PM $166.5K

|
Events

1

|
Markets

1

AI Analysis

Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks

PM $166.5K

Reported volume ยท provider units

1

Saved contracts

0

Reviewed equivalent pairs

Source snapshot: Oct 18, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

About This Event

This market will resolve to "Daniel Dubois" if Daniel Dubois is officially declared the winner of the fight against Fabio Wardley, scheduled for October 17, 2026. It will resolve to "Fabio Wardley" if Fabio Wardley is officially declared the winner. If the fight is declared a draw or technical draw, ruled a No Contest, not scored, canceled before it begins, or postponed beyond October 31, 2026, this market will resolve "50-50." The resolution source for this market will be official information from governing body.

This saved analysis is awaiting a background update. Its prices and claims may be outdated; compare them with the dated market data above.

Snapshot observed 2026-10-16T06:00:05.833Z. This analysis describes that snapshot and is not a live news update.

What the contract measures

The contract is a Polymarket market on the outcome of the boxing bout between Daniel Dubois and Fabio Wardley. It resolves to "Daniel Dubois" if Daniel Dubois is officially declared the winner, and to "Fabio Wardley" if Fabio Wardley is officially declared the winner [1]. The rules also specify a third path: if the fight is declared a draw or technical draw, ruled a No Contest, not scored, canceled before it begins, or postponed beyond October 31, 2026, the market resolves "50-50" [1]. The stated resolution source is "official information from governing body" [1]. The rules state that the fight is scheduled for October 17, 2026 [1]. That is the date in the contract text, and this evidence does not confirm whether the bout took place on that date.

Reading the snapshot

The provider observation time is 2026-10-16T06:00:05.833Z, and the source was retrieved at 2026-10-16T07:24:00.637Z [1]. The listed end time is 2026-10-18T03:59:59.999Z [1]. These are three different timestamps: the observation time records when the price was captured, the retrieval time records when the saved source was pulled, and the listed end time is when the provider says the market closes. None of them confirms a result.

The saved prices are Daniel Dubois at 0.735 and Fabio Wardley at 0.265 [1]. These are snapshot prices from one provider event, not executable quotes or verified probabilities. The market is listed as active in the saved data [1]. The sample covers one market from one event, and the saved data reports no partial sample. The provider's own sample warning says that including all saved markets "does not establish that the providers list every possible real-world outcome" [1]. Because only one platform appears in this evidence, no cross-platform comparison is possible here.

Volume is not included in this evidence, so nothing can be said about liquidity or the number of traders.

What remains uncertain

The evidence does not show whether the fight occurred, was postponed, or has a result. It does not explain why the prices stood where they did at the observation time. It also does not show any current status after the saved retrieval time. A reader should check the listed close time and the official governing body information named in the rules before relying on this snapshot for any later decision.

References

  1. Polymarket: Daniel Dubois vs. Fabio Wardley. Provider data observed 2026-10-16T06:00:05.833Z.

AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.

Saved Oct 16, 2026 UTC

AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.

Prices are catalog snapshots and may have changed. Check each market's rules and observation time.

Market Insights

Price gaps of 2 pp+

0

Reviewed equivalent pairs

0

No currently reviewed equivalent pairs with both binary Yes prices are available.

Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.

Trade This Market