Fedoryshyn Ivan vs. Badai Maksym
PM $0
1
5
Fedoryshyn Ivan vs. Badai Maksym
PM $0
1
5
AI Analysis
Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks
PM $0
Reported volume · provider units
5
Saved contracts
0
Reviewed equivalent pairs
Source snapshot: Oct 16, 2026, 6:00 AM UTC
About This Event
This market refers to the table tennis match between Fedoryshyn Ivan and Badai Maksym in Setka Cup Ukraine Men, scheduled for October 16 at 1:30PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Fedoryshyn Ivan' if Fedoryshyn Ivan wins against Badai Maksym. This market will resolve to 'Badai Maksym' if Badai Maksym wins against Fedoryshyn Ivan. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.
Snapshot observed 2026-10-16T03:00:06.094Z. This analysis describes that snapshot and is not a live news update.
What the contract measures
The cited Polymarket event covers a table tennis match between Fedoryshyn Ivan and Badai Maksym in Setka Cup Ukraine Men, scheduled for October 16 at 1:30PM ET [1]. The head-to-head contract resolves to the named player who wins the match [1]. The rules also set fallback outcomes. A canceled or tied match, or one delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner, resolves to 50-50, and a walkover also resolves to 50-50 [1]. If a match begins but one player advances because the opponent retires, defaults, or is disqualified, the market resolves to the player who advances [1].
The totals and game handicap contracts are separate markets within the same event. The Over/Under 3.5 and 4.5 contracts depend on total games, and the handicap contracts are written in game spreads such as Fedoryshyn Ivan (-1.5) vs Badai Maksym (+1.5) [1]. The primary resolution source is official event statistics, with a consensus of credible reporting used only if final statistics are not published within 2 hours after the event ends [1].
All five markets list an end time of 2026-10-23T17:30:00.000Z [1]. This is a listed close time in the contract data, not a confirmed resolution time.
Reading the snapshot
The provider observed these prices at 2026-10-16T03:00:06.094Z, and the source was retrieved at 2026-10-16T04:14:32.618Z [1]. The prices describe that earlier moment only. They are snapshots, not executable quotes or verified probabilities.
The sample includes all five saved markets for this event, and it is not marked as partial [1]. The head-to-head contract shows 0.5 for each player [1]. The 3.5 and 4.5 total games contracts each show Over at 0.505 and Under at 0.495 [1]. Both game handicap contracts show 0.5 for each side [1].
Because every market comes from one platform and one event, the prices can be compared within this event. Their wording differs, though. The totals contracts ask about game counts, the handicap contracts ask about game margins, and the head-to-head contract asks about the match winner. A difference between them does not show an arbitrage opportunity. The evidence also includes no volume or trader counts, so the prices cannot be read as liquidity or agreement.
What remains uncertain
The evidence does not explain why prices sit where they do, and it contains no news about either player or the event. It does not confirm that the match will be played as scheduled, and it does not show a result or final statistics. Prices may have changed after the snapshot, so readers should check the provider page for current figures and the official statistics once they are published.
References
- Polymarket: Fedoryshyn Ivan vs. Badai Maksym. Provider data observed 2026-10-16T03:00:06.094Z.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
Saved Oct 16, 2026 UTCOverview
This PredictPedia entry covers a Polymarket event for a table tennis match between Fedoryshyn Ivan and Badai Maksym in Setka Cup Ukraine Men. The event record describes the match as scheduled for October 16 at 1:30PM ET [1]. The saved event lists the contract end time as 2026-10-23T17:30:00.000Z [1]. That is the listed close for the contracts, not a confirmed time the match was played or resolved. The event contains five markets: a match winner market, two total games markets at 3.5 and 4.5 games (each with Over and Under outcomes), and two game handicap markets at plus or minus 1.5 games, with each player shown as the favorite in one of them [1]. Each market's status is listed as active in the saved record [1]. The winner market resolves to whichever player wins the match [1]. The rules also set out what happens in unusual outcomes. If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner, the market resolves 50-50 [1]. If a match begins but is not completed, and one player advances because the opponent retired, defaulted, or was disqualified, the market resolves to the player who advances [1]. A walkover, where a player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically, also resolves 50-50 [1]. The primary resolution source is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. If those final statistics are not published within 2 hours after the event concludes, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead [1].
Why It Matters
The winner market is a contract on the outcome of this single match, paying out based on which player wins under the stated rules [1]. The total games markets are tied to how many games the match contains relative to the 3.5 and 4.5 thresholds, and the handicap markets are tied to the margin of games relative to plus or minus 1.5 [1]. The rules in the source explain how these contracts handle cancellation, walkover, and retirement, which is important for understanding what a position is worth if the match does not finish normally [1]. The prices in the snapshot reflect the market at observation time and are not executable quotes or verified probabilities.
Snapshot context
The latest published provider snapshot for this topic was observed on 2026-10-16 at 03:00 UTC. It contains listings from Polymarket. Market descriptions and listed closing times define the contracts; they do not establish that the real-world outcome has occurred. This article does not include a separately verified news update. [1]
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens if the match is canceled or ends in a tie?
The market resolves 50-50 if the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined [1].
What happens if one player retires or is disqualified?
If the match begins but is not completed and one player advances because the opponent retired, defaulted, or was disqualified, the market resolves to the player who advances [1]. A walkover before the start resolves 50-50 [1].
What source determines the result?
The primary source is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. If final statistics are not published within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used [1].
Does the market price show the chance that a player wins?
The saved prices are snapshots at observation time and are not executable quotes or verified probabilities, so they should not be read as confirmed chances of an outcome [1].
AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.
Market Insights
Price gaps of 2 pp+
0
Reviewed equivalent pairs
0
No currently reviewed equivalent pairs with both binary Yes prices are available.
Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.
