Orlando vs DC United: First Half BTTS
K 0 contracts
1
1
Orlando vs DC United: First Half BTTS
K 0 contracts
1
1
AI Analysis
Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks
K 0 contracts
Reported volume · provider units
1
Saved contracts
0
Reviewed equivalent pairs
Source snapshot: Oct 17, 2026, 8:57 PM UTC
About This Event
ORL vs DCU (Oct 17) If Orlando and DC United both score a goal in the 1st Half of the Orlando vs DC United MLS match originally scheduled for Oct 17, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes. Only goals scored during the 1st Half count for the purposes of this market. Own goals count towards the team awarded the goal. This market will close and expire early if the event occurs.
Snapshot observed 2026-10-17T12:00:05.894Z. This analysis describes that snapshot and is not a live news update.
What the contract measures
The contract asks whether both Orlando and DC United score in the first half of their MLS match, as described in the Kalshi event excerpt [1]. The rules say the market "resolves to Yes" if "Orlando and DC United both score a goal in the 1st Half" of the match "originally scheduled for Oct 17, 2026" [1]. Only first-half goals count, and "Own goals count towards the team awarded the goal" [1]. The market "will close and expire early if the event occurs" [1]. Because the wording is specific to the first half, a reader should not treat this contract as a full-match or any-time BTTS market.
Reading the snapshot
The provider observed this market at 2026-10-17T12:00:05.894Z, and the source was retrieved at 2026-10-17T12:33:03.694Z [1]. The saved prices are Yes at 0.295 and No at 0.705 [1]. These are snapshot values from that observation time, not live prices and not executable quotes. They also should not be read as verified probabilities. The market's listed end date is 2026-10-19T23:30:00.000Z [1]. That is a listed close time in the provider data, not a resolution date or a confirmed event time. The excerpt separately states "Listed end time: not supplied" [1], so the two timing fields should be read with care.
The sample covers one market from one provider event. Coverage shows one total market, one included, and no partial sample [1]. That means no other outcomes for this event were omitted from the saved data. However, the sample does not establish that the provider lists every possible outcome for the real-world match. No other platform's price for a similar contract is in the evidence, so no cross-platform comparison is possible.
What remains uncertain
The evidence does not explain why the Yes price sits where it does. It also does not show trading volume, liquidity, or the number of participants. The excerpt does not report the match status beyond the event title and the statement that the provider status is active [1]. A reader should check the official contract rules and current provider data before drawing conclusions about this market.
References
- Kalshi: Orlando vs DC United: First Half BTTS. Provider data observed 2026-10-17T12:00:05.894Z.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
Saved Oct 17, 2026 UTCOverview
This PredictPedia entry covers a Kalshi market titled "Orlando vs DC United: First Half BTTS." The contract asks whether both Orlando and DC United score a goal during the first half of the MLS match originally scheduled for October 17, 2026 [1]. The contract resolves to Yes if both teams score in that period, and to No otherwise under the standard binary structure shown in the market record. The rules are narrow. Only goals scored during the first half count toward the market [1]. Own goals are credited to the team awarded the goal, so an own goal can help the side it is credited to meet the condition [1]. The provider states that the market will close and expire early if the event occurs [1]. The provider's status for this event is active, and no listed end time was supplied [1]. The market record shows an end date of October 19, 2026 at 23:30 UTC. That date is part of the contract data. It is not an announced match date or a confirmed time when the contract will settle, and the provider rules do not describe it as one. The pricing snapshot in this entry reflects one observation made at 12:00 UTC on October 17, 2026, retrieved at 12:33 UTC the same day. It is a snapshot of the listed Yes and No prices at that time. It is not an executable quote, a live price, or a verified probability of the outcome. A high or low price on a single contract does not show how many people are trading it or how easily it could be bought or sold.
Why It Matters
The contract measures a specific scoring pattern rather than the match result. It asks only whether both teams score before the first half ends, which makes it a separate question from who wins or how many goals are scored overall [1]. Because the rules limit the count to first-half goals and specify how own goals are credited [1], a reader needs those definitions to understand what the contract actually tracks. The early closing clause means the contract can end before the scheduled match finishes if the qualifying event happens [1].
Snapshot context
The latest published provider snapshot for this topic was observed on 2026-10-17 at 12:00 UTC. It contains listings from Kalshi. Market descriptions and listed closing times define the contracts; they do not establish that the real-world outcome has occurred. This article does not include a separately verified news update. [1]
Frequently Asked Questions
What goals count toward this market?
Only goals scored during the first half count for the purposes of this market [1].
How are own goals treated?
Own goals count toward the team awarded the goal, so they are credited to that team for the purposes of this contract [1].
What happens if both teams score in the first half?
The market resolves to Yes, and the provider states that it will close and expire early once the event occurs [1].
Does the market have a confirmed end time?
The provider did not supply a listed end time for this event [1]. The end date stored in the market record is a contract data field and should not be read as an announced match or settlement time.
AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.
Market Insights
Price gaps of 2 pp+
0
Reviewed equivalent pairs
0
No currently reviewed equivalent pairs with both binary Yes prices are available.
Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.
