AFC Rushden & Diamonds vs. Long Eaton United FC - Total Corners
PM $0
1
23
AFC Rushden & Diamonds vs. Long Eaton United FC - Total Corners
PM $0
1
23
AI Analysis
Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks
PM $0
Reported volume · provider units
23
Saved contracts
0
Same-question pairs
Source snapshot: Oct 23, 2026, 3:00 AM UTC
About This Event
Total corners markets for the FA Cup game between AFC Rushden & Diamonds and Long Eaton United FC, scheduled for August 22, 2026 at 10:00 AM ET.
Snapshot observed 2026-10-23T03:00:06.015Z. This analysis describes that snapshot and is not a live news update.
What the contract measures
The supplied evidence covers total corners markets for the FA Cup game between AFC Rushden & Diamonds and Long Eaton United FC, which the provider lists as scheduled for August 22, 2026 at 10:00 AM ET [1]. The included contracts are Over/Under markets. Full-match lines run from 7.5 to 13.5 total corners, first-half lines from 3.5 to 5.5, and second-half lines from 3.5 to 4.5 [1]. Each included market lists an end time of 2026-08-22T14:00:00.000Z [1]. This is the contract's listed close time. The evidence does not show how or when any market resolved, or what the final corner count was.
Reading the snapshot
The provider observed these markets at 2026-10-23T03:00:06.015Z, and the saved record was retrieved at 2026-10-23T03:39:49.218Z [1]. Both times are after the listed end time, so this record is a historical snapshot and should not be read as a live quote. Each included market shows Over at 0.5 and Under at 0.5 [1]. These are snapshot prices, not executable quotes or verified probabilities. Because the two sides of every included line are identical, the snapshot shows no price difference between Over and Under on any of these lines.
The sample is partial. The provider reports 23 total markets for this event, and 12 are included [1]. The selection rule ranks markets by finite Yes price and then by volume. Every included price is the same, so the saved data does not show how the ranking separated the included markets from the omitted ones. The 11 omitted markets should not be assumed to have higher or lower prices. The excerpt does not report volume for these markets, and volume should not be read as liquidity or as a count of traders.
Contracts on this event use different thresholds and periods. Their prices should not be averaged or treated as measuring the same outcome. A difference between two prices on different lines is not, by itself, an arbitrage opportunity.
What remains uncertain
The evidence does not include the match result, the actual corner totals, or any resolution outcome. It describes the provider status only as "active" in the saved excerpt, and it does not show whether the markets have changed since the observation time. Only one source is supplied, so no independent cross-platform comparison is possible. Readers should check the provider's current listing and the contract rules before drawing conclusions.
References
- Polymarket: AFC Rushden & Diamonds vs. Long Eaton United FC - Total Corners. Provider data observed 2026-10-23T03:00:06.015Z.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
Saved Oct 23, 2026 UTCOverview
This article covers a Polymarket event titled "AFC Rushden & Diamonds vs. Long Eaton United FC - Total Corners" [1]. The event lists total corners markets for an FA Cup match between the two clubs, which the source says was scheduled for August 22, 2026 at 10:00 AM ET [1]. The saved event record gives a listed end time of 2026-08-22T14:00:00.000Z [1]. The event contains several kinds of corner contracts. The source lists full-match Over/Under lines at 7.5, 8.5, 9.5, 10.5, 11.5, 12.5 and 13.5 total corners [1]. It also lists first-half Over/Under lines at 3.5, 4.5 and 5.5, and second-half Over/Under lines at 3.5 and 4.5 [1]. Each of these is a separate contract with its own title, so a reader should treat each line as its own question about the number of corners recorded in that period. In the saved snapshot, every included Over and Under outcome is shown at a price of 0.5 [1]. A price is a snapshot of the market at the time it was recorded, not an executable quote, and it is not a verified probability of the corner count. The equal prices also mean the snapshot does not show any market view that one side was more likely than the other. The saved record was observed at 2026-10-23T03:00:06.015Z and retrieved at 2026-10-23T03:39:49.218Z [1]. The provider listed the event status as active in that record [1]. That status describes the saved snapshot only. The listed end time of August 22, 2026 is a contract rule and does not show that any match event happened on that date, and the supplied evidence does not include a match result or a settlement outcome.
Why It Matters
The contracts measure the number of corners recorded in the match, or in one half of it, compared with a stated line. Each full-match contract asks whether the total corners will be over or under a threshold such as 7.5 or 10.5 [1]. The half-match contracts apply the same kind of question to the first or second half, using lower thresholds such as 3.5 or 4.5 [1]. Because the lines are set at different levels, one event can have several contracts that answer related but separate questions about the same match. For a reader, the main point is to check which period and which line a contract covers. The saved event shows 12 included markets out of 23 total markets for this event [1]. The included set was chosen by a provider ordering rule based on finite Yes price, then volume, and missing or invalid prices rank last [1]. Since all included outcomes in this snapshot are at 0.5, that ordering does not reveal how the omitted markets were priced, and the sample should not be read as the full set of corner contracts for the match.
Snapshot context
The latest published provider snapshot for this topic was observed on 2026-10-23 at 03:00 UTC. It contains listings from Polymarket. Market descriptions and listed closing times define the contracts; they do not establish that the real-world outcome has occurred. This article does not include a separately verified news update. [1]
Frequently Asked Questions
What does a price of 0.5 on the Over and Under outcomes mean?
In the saved snapshot, both Over and Under are shown at 0.5 for each included line [1]. This is a recorded price, not an executable quote or a verified probability, so it should not be read as a forecast of how many corners the match will produce.
Does this event show every corner market for the match?
No. The provider coverage record shows 12 included markets out of 23 total markets for this event, and the sample is marked as partial [1]. The omitted markets are not shown in the saved record, so the included set should not be treated as the full field.
Does the saved record show the result of the match?
The supplied evidence does not include a match result or settlement. It shows a listed end time of August 22, 2026 at 14:00 UTC and a snapshot observed in October 2026 with the event status listed as active [1]. The status describes that saved record and does not establish how or whether the contracts resolved.
AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.
Related prediction markets
Prices are catalog snapshots and may have changed. Check each market's rules and observation time.
Sunderland AFC vs. Leeds United FC - Total Corners
PM $75Manchester United FC vs. AFC Bournemouth - Total Corners
PM $0AFC Bournemouth vs. Leeds United FC - Total Corners
PM $0
Bradford City AFC vs. Barnsley FC - Total Corners
PM $0Huddersfield Town AFC vs. Luton Town FC - Total Corners
PM $0Doncaster Rovers FC vs. Oxford United FC - Total Corners
PM $0Market Insights
Price gaps of 2 pp+
0
Same-question pairs
0
No outcomes on this page have been reviewed as the same question on both platforms yet.
Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.
