Yes69%
Vol$0.00
Markets1
Event Group
EventKALSHI

Single EventKALSHIPolitics
Will SCOTUS bar successive habeas claims that could have been raised earlier?
Part of: Will SCOTUS bar successive habeas claims that could have been raised earlier?Before 2028 If the Supreme Court, in Guerrero v. Johnson, rules a habeas claim does not rely on a previously unavailable new constitutional rule when the petitioner could have asserted a claim based on that rule in an earlier federal habeas petition, then the market resolves to Yes. The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that a habeas claim does not rely on a “new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive
YesLeading Yes Probability
69%
|
VolTotal Volume
$0.00
|
Markets
1
Will SCOTUS bar successive habeas claims that could have been raised earlier?

Yes
69%
|
Vol
$0.00
|
Markets
1
Market Price Graph
1 market tracked
Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of Eric Guerrero in Guerrero v. Johnson
kalshi
No data available
All Markets(1)
| Market | Price |
|---|---|
Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of Eric Guerrero in Guerrero v. Johnson | 69% |
Markets (1)
Sort
