
$174.07K
1
10

$174.07K
1
10
10 markets tracked

No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Poly | 35% |
![]() | Poly | 35% |
![]() | Poly | 34% |
![]() | Poly | 32% |
![]() | Poly | 31% |
![]() | Poly | 29% |
![]() | Poly | 17% |
![]() | Poly | 15% |
![]() | Poly | 15% |
![]() | Poly | 6% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve based on the countries that officially recognize Palestine as a state by December 31, 2026, 11:59pm ET. An announcement of intentions will not suffice to resolve this market to "Yes." Only a government's formal recognition of the State of Palestine will count toward a “Yes” resolution for this market. The primary resolution source for this market will be official government information. However, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
This prediction market focuses on which countries will formally recognize the State of Palestine as a sovereign nation before the end of 2026. Recognition is a critical diplomatic and legal step in international relations, signifying that one state accepts the legitimacy and sovereignty of another. The topic sits at the heart of the long-standing Israeli-Palestinian conflict and broader Middle Eastern geopolitics. As of late 2024, Palestine is recognized by 143 of the 193 United Nations member states, but not by major Western powers like the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Canada, or Australia. This market tracks the potential for that number to grow, with particular attention on countries in Europe and the Americas that have historically withheld recognition pending a negotiated two-state solution. Recent developments, including the war in Gaza that began in October 2023, have intensified global diplomatic pressure and debate on this issue, making the question of further recognitions highly timely. The market resolves based on official government announcements of formal recognition, not mere statements of intent, with credible reporting used as a secondary verification source.
The quest for international recognition of Palestine is deeply rooted in the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Following the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, the Palestinian national movement sought statehood. A major turning point was the Palestinian Declaration of Independence in 1988, proclaimed by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) under Yasser Arafat. This immediately triggered a wave of recognitions, primarily from Arab, Muslim, and Soviet-bloc nations. The 1993 Oslo Accords, which established the Palestinian Authority, envisioned statehood as the outcome of final-status negotiations, but that process repeatedly stalled. Diplomacy shifted back to the UN in the 2010s. In 2011, Palestine applied for full UN membership, a bid that stalled in the Security Council. However, in November 2012, the UN General Assembly voted overwhelmingly to grant Palestine 'non-member observer state' status, a significant diplomatic upgrade supported by 138 countries. This era saw several European states, like Sweden in 2014, extend formal recognition. The period from 2010 to 2011 was particularly active, with multiple South American nations including Brazil, Argentina, and Chile recognizing Palestine. This historical pattern shows that recognitions often come in waves, spurred by diplomatic initiatives or escalations in the conflict.
The recognition of Palestine by additional states carries profound political and symbolic weight. For Palestinians, it represents validation of their national aspirations and a tool to pressure Israel in the absence of productive negotiations. Each new recognition chips away at the diplomatic isolation Israel seeks to impose on the Palestinian leadership and could strengthen Palestine's position in international legal forums, such as the International Criminal Court. For the recognizing countries, it is a foreign policy statement aligning with principles of self-determination and international law, but it also risks diplomatic friction with Israel and its key ally, the United States. A cascade of recognitions, particularly from Western nations, could fundamentally alter the diplomatic landscape of the conflict. It would signal that the international community, frustrated by the stagnation of the peace process, is willing to act unilaterally to define parameters for a two-state solution. This could potentially force a recalculation of strategies in both Jerusalem and Ramallah, but it also risks hardening positions if viewed as an adversarial act.
The diplomatic landscape shifted notably in May 2024 when Spain, Ireland, and Norway simultaneously announced their formal recognition of the State of Palestine, with Slovenia following suit in June. This coordinated move by EU members marked the most significant Western recognition in a decade and was explicitly linked to the war in Gaza and the pursuit of a two-state solution. These announcements have ignited debate within other European parliaments, including those of the UK, France, and Belgium, where motions or discussions on recognition are active. Malta has also indicated it may recognize Palestine when it can do so in a coordinated manner. Meanwhile, Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong has stated that recognition is under consideration. The momentum appears to be building, particularly in Europe, setting the stage for potential further announcements in the coming years.
Supporting a two-state solution is endorsing a future outcome where Israel and Palestine coexist peacefully. Recognizing Palestine is a present-day diplomatic act that treats the Palestinian Authority as the government of a sovereign state. Many countries argue recognition advances the two-state solution, while others believe it should only follow a final negotiated agreement.
Major powers that do not formally recognize Palestine include the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Australia, and Japan. Most of these states support a two-state solution but have conditioned formal recognition on its achievement through direct negotiations between the parties.
Yes, for a state to become a full member of the United Nations, its application must be recommended by the UN Security Council and approved by a two-thirds vote in the General Assembly. Widespread bilateral recognition strengthens such a bid, but the US has historically used its Security Council veto to block Palestine's full membership application.
The 2012 vote upgraded Palestine's status at the UN from 'observer entity' to 'non-member observer state.' This allowed Palestine to join international treaties and bodies, such as the International Criminal Court, and is widely seen as de facto recognition of statehood by the international community, even without full UN membership.
Israel typically condemns such recognitions, recalling its ambassadors for consultations and summoning the recognizing country's ambassador for formal protests. It argues these moves harm the peace process by encouraging Palestinian unilateralism. In some cases, it has suspended diplomatic cooperation or aid projects.
While theoretically possible, it is extremely rare in state practice. No country has formally withdrawn its recognition of Palestine since first granting it. Diplomatic relations may be downgraded or frozen, but the act of recognition itself is typically a permanent political and legal declaration.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.





No related news found
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/-yI_X8" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Which countries will recognize Palestine before 2027?"></iframe>