
$7.07K
1
1

1 market tracked
No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
Will Trump end the Federal Reserve before Jan 1, 2027? | Kalshi | 4% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
Before 2027 If the Federal Reserve System has ended before January 1, 2027, then the market resolves to Yes. Early close condition: This market will close and expire early if the event occurs. This market will close and expire early if the event occurs.
Prediction markets currently assign a very low probability to the prospect of Donald Trump ending the Federal Reserve before January 20, 2029. On Kalshi, the leading contract trades at approximately 9 cents, implying just a 9% chance. This price indicates the market views a full dismantling of the U.S. central bank as a highly improbable event, even within the context of a potential second Trump administration. The market's thin liquidity, with about $92,000 in volume, suggests this is a speculative niche topic rather than a heavily traded core political forecast.
The primary factor suppressing the probability is the immense institutional and legal inertia protecting the Federal Reserve. Abolishing the Fed would require an act of Congress, a monumental political hurdle even with unified government control, due to the central bank's entrenched role in the global financial system. Historically, Trump has been a vocal critic of Fed leadership and policy, particularly interest rate decisions, but his advocacy has centered on influencing its actions rather than its existence. Market pricing reflects the view that his rhetoric is more likely to translate into pressure on monetary policy or attempts to install sympathetic leadership rather than a quixotic legal battle to terminate the institution itself.
A significant shift in this market would require a concrete, high profile political move toward Fed abolition. This could be triggered by a major policy proposal from Trump or a powerful congressional ally explicitly calling for an end to the Federal Reserve System, coupled with serious legislative steps. A severe financial crisis blamed directly on Fed actions could also, theoretically, fuel populist momentum for restructuring. However, the 9% price largely accounts for tail risk and the unpredictable nature of Trump's policy announcements. The odds would only see a sustained spike if such a proposal gained measurable traction in Congress, which currently appears outside the political Overton Window.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$7.07K
1
1
This prediction market topic addresses whether former President Donald Trump will successfully dismantle the Federal Reserve System before January 1, 2027. The Federal Reserve, established in 1913, serves as the central bank of the United States, responsible for monetary policy, financial system stability, and banking supervision. A 'Yes' resolution requires the complete termination of the Federal Reserve System, not merely significant reform or personnel changes. This topic has gained prominence due to Trump's historical criticism of the Fed and his campaign rhetoric suggesting a desire for greater presidential control over monetary policy. The question intersects high-stakes politics, economic theory, and constitutional authority, making it a subject of intense speculation among investors, policymakers, and political observers. Interest stems from the profound implications such an action would have on global financial markets, the U.S. economy, and the balance of power between the executive branch and independent institutions. Recent discussions have been fueled by Trump's public statements and the broader political movement advocating for auditing or restructuring the Fed, which views the institution as overly powerful and unaccountable.
The Federal Reserve System was created by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, signed by President Woodrow Wilson, in response to a series of financial panics, most notably the Panic of 1907. Its establishment marked a compromise between those advocating for a centralized bank and those fearing concentration of financial power. For most of its history, the Fed's independence from direct political control has been a cornerstone principle, reinforced by the Treasury-Fed Accord of 1951, which formally separated monetary policy from Treasury financing. The most significant historical precedent for challenging this independence came during the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt, who fundamentally altered the monetary system by taking the U.S. off the gold standard in 1933, an action that required congressional approval. In the modern era, calls to 'End the Fed' gained traction after the 2008 financial crisis, with critics blaming the Fed's policies for creating asset bubbles. The movement found a political champion in Ron Paul during the 2012 Republican primaries. Legislative efforts have largely focused on transparency, such as the 'Audit the Fed' bills, rather than outright abolition, highlighting the significant legal and political barriers to dismantling a 110-year-old institution.
The potential abolition of the Federal Reserve carries monumental implications for the global financial system. As the issuer of the world's primary reserve currency, the U.S. dollar, the Fed's policies influence interest rates, investment flows, and economic stability worldwide. Its sudden termination would create immediate uncertainty in bond markets, currency valuations, and banking sector liquidity, potentially triggering a global financial crisis. Domestically, it would force a fundamental reconfiguration of how monetary policy is conducted, possibly leading to congressional control over interest rates or a return to a commodity-based standard like gold. Politically, ending the Fed would represent an unprecedented consolidation of economic power within the executive branch, eroding a key institutional check established to mitigate political business cycles. It would also ignite a fierce constitutional debate over the separation of powers and the proper role of independent agencies. For average citizens, the consequences would manifest through bank stability, mortgage rates, employment levels, and the value of savings, making this one of the most consequential economic policy questions of the era.
As of late 2024, the Federal Reserve continues to operate under its existing statutory framework. The political landscape is defined by the 2024 presidential election campaign, where former President Trump has made critical remarks about Fed independence but has not formally proposed legislation to abolish the institution. The Federal Reserve Transparency Act, which would subject the Fed's monetary policy decisions to Government Accountability Office audits, has passed the House but faces an uncertain future in the Senate. Chair Jerome Powell continues to serve a term that lasts until 2026, and the Board of Governors has several vacant seats that a potential new administration could fill. No legislative proposal to terminate the Federal Reserve System has been introduced in the 118th Congress. Market participants are closely monitoring campaign rhetoric and potential policy platforms for indications of how a new administration might approach central bank reform.
There is no consensus on a replacement system. Proposals include a congressional monetary commission, a currency board, a return to a gold standard, or direct Treasury Department control of money issuance. The transition would require complex legislation and likely a multi-year implementation period to avoid financial chaos.
No, the President cannot unilaterally abolish the Federal Reserve. Terminating the Fed would require an act of Congress to repeal the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and subsequent amendments, followed by presidential signature. Such legislation would face significant constitutional and political hurdles.
Yes, historical examples exist but are rare and context-specific. New Zealand restructured its central bank significantly in 1989 but did not abolish it. The United Kingdom temporarily suspended the Bank of England's independence during wars. A complete, peacetime abolition of a major modern central bank like the Fed has no precedent in the 20th or 21st centuries.
Initially, mortgage and savings rates would experience extreme volatility due to market uncertainty. Long-term, rates would be set by market forces or a new monetary authority, potentially leading to higher and more variable rates without the Fed's stabilizing interventions, especially during economic downturns.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!
No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/05WBC0" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Will Trump end the Federal Reserve before 2027?"></iframe>