$5.13K
1
10
$5.13K
1
10
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve according to the company that owns the model with the second-highest arena score based on the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard when the table under the "Leaderboard" tab is checked on March 31, 2026, 12:00 PM ET. Results from the "Arena Score" section on the Leaderboard tab of https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text set to default (style control on) will be used to resolve this market. If two models are tied for the second-highest arena score at this market's check time, reso
Prediction markets currently assign an 86% probability that xAI will own the AI model with the second-highest Arena Score on the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard as of January 31, 2026. This high confidence level, priced at 86 cents per share, indicates traders view this outcome as very likely. The remaining 14% probability is distributed among other contenders like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind. With only $48,000 in total volume across related markets, liquidity is thin, suggesting this is a niche, speculative bet rather than a heavily traded consensus.
The primary driver is xAI's rapid ascent with its Grok series of models. The most recent public benchmarks show Grok-2 performing competitively near the top of leaderboards, demonstrating a trajectory that markets believe will continue. Second, the structure of the market itself focuses on the #2 position, which traders likely interpret as a race where OpenAI's models (like GPT-5 or a successor) are a near-lock for #1. This makes xAI the clear favorite for the runner-up spot over other labs like Anthropic (Claude) or Google (Gemini), whose development cycles are perceived as less aggressive. Third, Elon Musk's consistent public emphasis on achieving top-tier AI capabilities aligns with this market sentiment, creating a narrative of inevitable upward movement.
The odds could shift significantly based on new model releases or benchmark updates before the January 31 cutoff. A surprise release and immediate evaluation of a new, highly capable model from Anthropic's Claude line or Google's Gemini Ultra could disrupt xAI's projected position. Furthermore, the Chatbot Arena's "style control on" benchmark is dynamic, and a change in evaluation methodology or a surge in community voting for a different model could alter the final standings. The thin market liquidity also means a relatively small amount of capital betting on an alternative outcome could move the price meaningfully in the final two weeks.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
This prediction market topic focuses on determining which company will possess the second-most capable publicly benchmarked large language model (LLM) at the end of January 2026, as measured by the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard. The Chatbot Arena, hosted on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena website (lmarena.ai), is a crowdsourced evaluation platform where users vote on the quality of responses from anonymous AI models in head-to-head conversations. The 'Arena Score' is an Elo-based rating derived from these human preferences, and the 'style control on' setting attempts to normalize for stylistic differences in model outputs to focus on reasoning and factual accuracy. The market resolves specifically by checking the leaderboard table on January 31, 2026, at 12:00 PM Eastern Time, and identifying the company behind the model with the second-highest score. This topic sits at the intersection of competitive AI benchmarking, corporate technological prowess, and market speculation. Interest stems from the high-stakes race for AI supremacy, where leaderboard positions are used as marketing tools, influence investment decisions, and signal research direction. Tracking the volatile rankings provides insight into which organizations are successfully translating research breakthroughs into performant, publicly accessible models.
The competitive benchmarking of AI models has evolved significantly since the early 2010s. Initially, performance was measured on static academic datasets like GLUE and SuperGLUE for natural language understanding. The introduction of the Chatbot Arena in May 2023 by LMSYS Org marked a pivotal shift toward dynamic, human-preference-based evaluation, reflecting how models are actually used in conversation. This method proved more correlated with perceived quality than scores on traditional benchmarks. Throughout 2023 and 2024, the leaderboard saw intense volatility. OpenAI's GPT-4 dominated the top spot upon its release in March 2023. Anthropic's Claude 3 models, released in March 2024, briefly challenged and sometimes surpassed GPT-4 on the Arena, demonstrating that leadership was not permanent. Google's Gemini Ultra entered the fray in early 2024, securing a top-three position. The precedent for this market was set by these rapid shifts, where a new model release from any major lab could reshuffle the rankings within months. The 'style control' feature was added to the Arena in late 2024 to address criticisms that models with verbose, flowery outputs were unfairly rewarded over concise, accurate ones, further refining the competitive criteria.
The ranking of AI models has substantial economic and strategic implications. For the companies involved, a top-two position on a respected leaderboard like the Chatbot Arena serves as a powerful marketing tool, attracting enterprise customers, developer mindshare, and venture capital. It can influence stock prices for public companies and valuation for private ones. For the broader tech ecosystem, the rankings signal which architectural approaches and training methodologies are most effective, guiding billions of dollars in research and development investment across the industry. Beyond commerce, the capabilities of these models have profound societal impact. The second-most capable model will likely be integrated into millions of applications, from search engines and office software to healthcare and education tools, shaping how people access information and automate tasks. The intense competition also raises concerns about a race dynamic that could compromise on safety testing or transparency, as companies rush to release models to claim a leaderboard position. The outcome of this market is therefore a proxy for understanding the balance of power in one of the most transformative technologies of the 21st century.
As of late 2024, the Chatbot Arena leaderboard remains highly dynamic. OpenAI's GPT-4 series and Anthropic's Claude 3 models are in close contention for the top positions, with their exact order fluctuating with minor updates. Google's Gemini Ultra and advanced open-weight models derived from Meta's Llama 3, like variants from Mistral AI, occupy the next tier. xAI's Grok-2 has entered the competitive landscape. All major players are known to be developing next-generation models, with announcements and releases expected throughout 2025, which will be the critical period shaping the standings for the January 2026 resolution.
It is a public leaderboard maintained by the LMSYS Org that ranks large language models based on an Elo rating system. The ratings are derived from millions of anonymous, crowdsourced human votes where users compare the quality of responses from two models in a conversation, providing a real-world performance benchmark.
It is a setting in the Arena's evaluation designed to reduce bias toward models with a particular writing style, such as being overly verbose or friendly. When enabled, it attempts to normalize responses to focus user comparisons more on factual accuracy, reasoning, and helpfulness, rather than stylistic preferences.
The Arena Score is an Elo rating, a system originally designed for chess. Models gain or lose points based on the outcomes of head-to-head comparisons voted on by users. A win against a highly rated model yields more points than a win against a lower-rated one, creating a dynamic ranking that reflects relative strength.
Historically, the second position has changed hands frequently. Anthropic held it with Claude 3 Opus in early 2024, Google has held it with Gemini Ultra, and OpenAI's models have often occupied both first and second place with different versions, such as GPT-4 and GPT-4 Turbo.
Yes, if an open-source model, such as a fine-tuned version of Llama or another publicly available architecture, achieves the second-highest Arena Score, the market resolves to the organization that developed and released that specific model. The market resolves based on the model's owner, not its licensing.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!
10 markets tracked
No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Poly | 28% |
 | Poly | 26% |
 | Poly | 25% |
 | Poly | 5% |
 | Poly | 4% |
 | Poly | 4% |
 | Poly | 3% |
 | Poly | 3% |
 | Poly | 1% |
 | Poly | 1% |
No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/48aRLA" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Which company has the #2 AI model end of March? (Style Control On)"></iframe>