AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027? | PredictPedia

GroupPOLYMARKET

AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027?

Event GroupPOLYMARKETTech

AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027?

Total Volume

$1.07K

Events

1

Markets

1

Trade on Polymarket

AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027?

AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027?

Platform StatsQuick Platform Comparison

Polymarket

1

markets · $1.07K

Kalshi

0

markets · $0.00

Price Spread

0.0%avg

max 0.0%

Arbitrage

0

of 0 cross-platform

Volume DistributionTotal: $1.07K

100%

Polymarket leads

Price ChartMatched Markets Price Graph

1 market tracked

AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027?

No data available

Single-Platform Markets(1)

Market	Platform	Price
AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027?	Poly	22%

AI Analysis

Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge

22%

Top Probability

$1.07K

Volume

1

Markets

1

Platforms

About This Event

This market will resolve to "Yes" if a state-of-the-art (SOTA) AI model achieves a score of 90% or greater on the FrontierMath Exam by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, the market will resolve to "No". The primary resolution source will be information from EpochAI however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Current Market Outlook

Prediction markets currently assign a low probability to an AI model achieving a 90% score on the FrontierMath benchmark before 2027. On Polymarket, the "Yes" share trades at approximately 20¢, implying the market sees only a 20% chance of this milestone being reached by the December 31, 2026 deadline. This price suggests the consensus view is heavily skeptical, viewing such rapid progress in AI mathematical reasoning as unlikely within the next two and a half years.

Key Factors Driving the Odds

The low probability is driven by the benchmark's extreme difficulty and the historical trajectory of AI progress in mathematics. The FrontierMath Exam is designed as a rigorous, publicly available benchmark to measure true reasoning and problem-solving capabilities, not just pattern recognition. Current state-of-the-art models, including advanced versions from leaders like OpenAI and Anthropic, have struggled to surpass scores in the 60-70% range on similarly challenging math benchmarks. Achieving 90% represents a leap in capability that likely requires fundamental architectural breakthroughs, not just incremental scaling.

Furthermore, the timeline is exceptionally tight. The field must not only create a model that can solve these complex problems but also do so in a way that is verifiably robust and general, avoiding benchmark-specific overfitting. The thin market volume of only $1,000 indicates low trader confidence and highlights that this is still a speculative, niche forecast without a strong consensus signal.

What Could Change These Odds

The primary catalyst for a dramatic shift in odds would be an unexpected breakthrough announcement from a major AI lab. A research paper demonstrating a novel training method or model architecture that yields a step-function improvement on existing math benchmarks, such as MATH or Olympiad-level problems, would cause the "Yes" probability to surge. Conversely, if progress plateaus through 2025 with only marginal gains, the current low odds could solidify further.

Key dates to watch are the release cycles for flagship models like GPT-5 or Claude 4 and beyond, along with associated technical reports. Performance on mathematical reasoning is a key metric in these releases. If a model in late 2025 or early 2026 approaches an 80% score on a comparable test, the market would likely reprice the 2026 year-end target of 90% as significantly more plausible.

AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.

Overview

This prediction market topic concerns whether a state-of-the-art artificial intelligence model will achieve a score of 90% or greater on the FrontierMath Benchmark by December 31, 2026. The FrontierMath Benchmark is a comprehensive evaluation suite designed to test advanced mathematical reasoning and problem-solving capabilities in AI systems, often seen as a significant milestone toward artificial general intelligence (AGI). Achieving such a high score would represent a substantial leap in AI's ability to handle complex, multi-step reasoning tasks that require deep understanding of mathematical concepts, abstraction, and symbolic manipulation. The benchmark is considered 'frontier' because it pushes beyond standard mathematical problem-solving to include novel, previously unseen problems that test generalization and creativity. The resolution of this market will primarily rely on data from EpochAI, a research organization tracking AI progress, with potential corroboration from credible technical reporting. Interest in this topic stems from its implications for the timeline of AI advancement, competitive dynamics between leading AI labs, and the potential economic and scientific disruptions that could follow from AI systems mastering high-level mathematics. Many researchers view mathematical reasoning as a key capability separating narrow AI from more general intelligence, making this benchmark a critical measuring stick for the field's progress.

Historical Context

The pursuit of AI capable of advanced mathematical reasoning has deep roots in the history of artificial intelligence. In the 1950s and 1960s, early AI programs like the Logic Theorist and General Problem Solver attempted to automate mathematical proof and problem-solving, embodying the symbolic AI paradigm. The development of specialized theorem-proving software, such as the 1970s-era Automath, demonstrated that computers could assist with formal verification of mathematical proofs, though these systems lacked the generality of human mathematicians. The 2010s saw a shift with the rise of machine learning. In 2015, Google DeepMind's AlphaGo mastered the complex game of Go, showcasing AI's ability to handle sophisticated strategic reasoning. A more direct precursor to FrontierMath was the introduction of the MATH dataset in 2021, a collection of 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems that became a standard benchmark. In 2022, OpenAI's GPT-4 achieved approximately 40% accuracy on the MATH dataset, while specialized systems like Google's Minerva, released in mid-2022, reached over 50% by leveraging extensive mathematical training data. The FrontierMath Benchmark, emerging around 2023-2024, represents a next-generation evaluation designed to be significantly more difficult and comprehensive than its predecessors, aiming to test the outer limits of current AI reasoning. This historical progression shows a consistent trend of benchmarks increasing in difficulty as AI capabilities improve, with FrontierMath positioned as the current high-water mark for assessing mathematical intelligence.

Why It Matters

Achieving a 90% score on the FrontierMath Benchmark would signal a fundamental shift in AI capabilities with profound implications. Economically, AI systems with such advanced mathematical reasoning could automate complex tasks in fields like scientific research, engineering design, financial modeling, and software development, potentially disrupting labor markets and creating new industries. The organizations that develop such AI first would gain significant competitive advantages, influencing global technological and economic leadership. The societal impact is equally significant. AI that reliably solves advanced mathematical problems could accelerate scientific discovery, from drug development to materials science, by formulating and testing hypotheses at unprecedented speed. However, it also raises concerns about control, safety, and the concentration of power. If AI can outperform humans in a domain as fundamental as mathematics, it challenges our understanding of human uniqueness and expertise. The development path toward this benchmark also matters, as it will test whether current AI architectures can achieve such reasoning through scaling alone or require new algorithmic breakthroughs. The outcome will inform debates about the feasibility and timeline of artificial general intelligence, influencing everything from government policy and corporate investment to public perception of AI's risks and benefits.

Current Status

As of late 2024, the race toward high scores on the FrontierMath Benchmark is intensifying among major AI labs. The best publicly reported scores are in the 60-70% range, achieved by models like OpenAI's o1-preview and Google's Gemini Advanced, which incorporate improved reasoning techniques. These models represent a shift from purely next-token prediction to more deliberate chain-of-thought or process-based reasoning, which is crucial for complex mathematics. Several labs are rumored to be training next-generation models with significantly increased scale and novel architectures specifically aimed at advancing reasoning capabilities. The benchmark itself continues to be refined by its creators to prevent overfitting and ensure it remains a true test of generalization. Epoch AI and other trackers are closely monitoring progress, with many experts divided on whether the 90% threshold is achievable within the given timeframe, citing both the rapid recent progress and the increasing difficulty of the final percentage points.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the FrontierMath Benchmark?

The FrontierMath Benchmark is a comprehensive evaluation suite designed to test advanced mathematical reasoning in AI systems. It includes thousands of challenging problems across various mathematical domains, requiring multi-step reasoning, abstraction, and the ability to handle novel problem types not seen during training.

Which AI company is most likely to achieve a 90% score first?

OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Anthropic are considered the leading contenders, based on their recent progress, research focus, and resources. OpenAI has strong iterative capabilities, DeepMind has deep expertise in reinforcement learning for problem-solving, and Anthropic focuses on reliable reasoning. The outcome is highly uncertain and may depend on unforeseen architectural breakthroughs.

Why is a 90% score on FrontierMath significant?

A 90% score would indicate that an AI system can reliably solve the vast majority of advanced mathematical problems posed to it, a capability closely associated with human expert-level reasoning. This is seen as a major milestone toward artificial general intelligence because mathematics requires abstraction, logical deduction, and creativity.

How does Epoch AI verify benchmark scores?

Epoch AI typically verifies scores by reviewing official publications from AI labs, technical reports, and sometimes by running independent evaluations. For a market resolution, they would seek confirmation from the model developers and ensure the test conditions adhere to the benchmark's standard protocols to prevent inflated results from specialized tuning.

What happens if a model scores 90% after the deadline?

The prediction market resolves based on whether the achievement happens by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. If a model achieves a 90% score after this date, even by a small margin, the market would resolve to 'No'. The deadline creates a specific timeframe for assessing the pace of AI progress.

Was this helpful?

Updated Jan 15, 2026

Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.

Custom AI Analysis Prompt

Tap to expand

Open in:ChatGPT Claude Gemini Grok DeepSeek

**Role:** Expert Prediction Market Analyst & Trader
**Objective:** Analyze the provided betting market data to deliver actionable insights, identify mispricings, and perform scenario analysis.
**Current Date:** Friday, January 16, 2026
**Context:** Prediction markets (Polymarket/Kalshi) are binary option markets where price (1-99) equals implied probability (1%-99%).

---

## 1. Event Snapshot
**Event:** AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027?
**Category:** Tech | **Status:** active
**Resolution Date:** Dec 31, 2026 (349 days left)
**Time Pressure:** Low

**Description:** This market will resolve to "Yes" if a state-of-the-art (SOTA) AI model achieves a score of 90% or greater on the FrontierMath Exam by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, the market will resolve to "No".

The primary resolution source will be information from EpochAI however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used. 

**Resolution Criteria (Sample):**
"This market will resolve to "Yes" if a state-of-the-art (SOTA) AI model achieves a score of 90% or greater on the FrontierMath Exam by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, the market will resolve to "No".

The primary resolution source will be information from EpochAI however a consensus of cr"

## 2. Market liquidity & Volume
* **Total Volume:** $1.1K
* **Total Liquidity:** $693
* **Activity Level:** Stable (Vol/Liq Ratio: 1.54)

## 3. Market Data (Prices & Odds)
### 1. AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027?
- **Polymarket** (End: Dec 31, 2026): Vol $1.1K
  DATA: [Yes: 21.5% (0.0%)] | [No: 78.5% (0.0%)]

---

## Analysis Instructions
Please provide a structured analysis using the following template:

### 1. Executive Summary
*   **Verdict:** [Most Likely Outcome]
*   **Confidence:** [0-100]%
*   **Timeframe:** [Immediate / Short-term / Long-term]
*   **Actionable Trade:** [Buy YES / Buy NO / Stay Away] (Include entry price target if applicable)
*   **Rationale:** 2-sentence summary of the core thesis.

### 2. Scenario Analysis
*   **Bull Case (Why YES goes up):** List specific catalysts or data points.
*   **Bear Case (Why YES goes down):** List specifics.
*   **Invalidation Point:** What happens to prove your thesis wrong?

### 3. Market Mechanics & Risks
*   **Liquidity/Volume Analysis:** Is the market efficient? Is it easy to exit?
*   **Cross-Platform Arbitrage:** (If applicable) Is the spread tradeable after fees?
*   **Time Decay:** How does time passing affect this position?

### 4. Signal Scores (0-100)
*   **Momentum:** [Score] (Price trend & velocity)
*   **Conviction:** [Score] (Volume backing the move)
*   **Information Edge:** [Score] (Likelihood of non-public info affecting price)
*   **Risk/Reward:** [Score] (Potential upside vs downside)

**Constraints:**
- Be direct and objective.
- Use bullet points for readability.
- If data is conflicting or insufficient, explicitly state "Low Confidence".

Tap text to select all

Embed Widget

Add this market to your website

Volume

Platforms

HTML

<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/4Ly522" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027?"></iframe>