
$1.05M
1
1

1 market tracked

No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Poly | 2% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
The U.S. government collected $82.2b in customs duties in FY 2025 (See: https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/files/reports-statements/financial-report/2024/notes-to-the-financial-statements19.pdf). This market will resolve to "Yes" if the value of costumes duties collected in FY 2025 according to the Financial Report of the United States Government published by the Treasury Department for FY 2025 (See: https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/reports-statements/financial-report/) is greater than $250b. Othe
Prediction markets are assigning an extremely low probability to U.S. tariffs generating over $250 billion in revenue for Fiscal Year 2025. On Polymarket, the "Yes" share is trading at approximately 2 cents, implying just a 2% chance. This indicates the market views the prospect as highly improbable, bordering on a near-certain "No" outcome. The market's high liquidity, with over $1.1 million in volume, suggests this is a well-traded consensus view rather than a speculative anomaly.
Two primary factors anchor this pessimistic pricing. First, the established baseline is profoundly distant from the target. The U.S. Treasury's own data shows customs duties collected $82.2 billion in FY 2025. For revenue to exceed $250 billion, it would require a sudden, unprecedented tripling of tariff income within a single fiscal year, a fiscal shock without modern precedent. Second, the current political and trade policy landscape does not support such a radical shift. While future tariff increases under a potential Trump administration are widely debated, even aggressive proposals focus on raising rates on specific trading partners, not on generating a revenue surge of this magnitude. The market is effectively pricing in the immense structural and legislative hurdles to achieving such a drastic increase.
The odds could theoretically shift with the announcement of revolutionary trade policy. A concrete, legislated proposal for sweeping, economy-wide tariff rates high enough to mathematically project revenue over $250 billion would force a market re-evaluation. However, the upcoming publication of the official FY 2025 Financial Report by the Treasury Department, due around the market's resolution date in late February 2026, is the definitive catalyst. This report will contain the final, audited revenue figure. A dramatic upward revision from the preliminary $82.2 billion note would be necessary to change the outcome, but such a monumental accounting discrepancy is itself considered highly unlikely by the market.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$1.05M
1
1
This prediction market topic concerns whether U.S. customs duties, commonly referred to as tariffs, will generate more than $250 billion in revenue for the federal government during Fiscal Year 2025. Tariffs are taxes imposed on imported goods, and their revenue is a significant component of federal receipts. The market resolves based on data from the official Financial Report of the United States Government published by the Treasury Department. The baseline for this question is substantial, as the Treasury reported collecting $82.2 billion in customs duties in Fiscal Year 2024, making the $250 billion target an exceptionally large increase of over 200%. This topic has gained significant attention due to policy proposals from the 2024 presidential election cycle, particularly from former President Donald Trump, who has advocated for sweeping new tariffs, including a universal 10% baseline tariff and tariffs exceeding 60% on goods from China. The market essentially functions as a referendum on the likelihood and scale of a major shift in U.S. trade policy. Interest stems from economists, investors, and policymakers, as such a revenue target would imply not just new tariffs but a profound restructuring of global trade relationships, with potential impacts on inflation, consumer prices, and international diplomacy.
The United States has used tariffs as a primary source of federal revenue for much of its history, particularly in the 19th century. However, following World War II and the establishment of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), the U.S. pursued a multilateral policy of tariff reduction. For decades, tariff revenue was a minor budget item, often below $30 billion annually. The modern context for high tariff revenue began in 2018 when President Trump invoked Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose tariffs on Chinese goods, citing unfair trade practices. This initiated a trade war, with the U.S. imposing tariffs on over $350 billion worth of Chinese imports and China retaliating in kind. The U.S. also imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum from most countries under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, citing national security. These actions caused tariff revenue to surge from $34.6 billion in Fiscal Year 2017 to a peak of $80.4 billion in Fiscal Year 2021. The Biden administration largely maintained these tariffs but pursued a more diplomatic approach. The historical precedent of the 2018-2021 period demonstrates that policy shifts can double tariff revenue, but reaching $250 billion would require a far more expansive and aggressive application of tariffs than previously seen.
The question of whether tariff revenue will exceed $250 billion matters because it serves as a direct proxy for a fundamental shift in U.S. economic policy toward protectionism. Such a revenue level would indicate not just the continuation of existing tariffs but the implementation of sweeping new ones, likely on a global scale. This would have immediate economic consequences, potentially raising costs for consumers and businesses that rely on imported materials, contributing to inflationary pressures. It would also strain diplomatic relations with trading partners, both allies and adversaries, and could trigger retaliatory measures, disrupting global supply chains that have only recently recovered from pandemic-era shocks. For investors, the outcome signals the regulatory and cost environment for multinational corporations. For policymakers, it represents a choice between leveraging trade policy for geopolitical goals and prioritizing low consumer prices and stable international economic relations. The downstream consequences could include shifts in manufacturing locations, changes in the composition of U.S. imports, and significant impacts on specific industries like retail, automotive, and electronics.
As of late 2024, the policy landscape is defined by the presidential election. The Biden administration has maintained existing tariffs but rejected calls for broad new ones, focusing instead on strategic sectors like clean energy. In May 2024, the administration announced new tariffs on $18 billion worth of Chinese imports, including electric vehicles and semiconductors, but these are targeted and not of the scale to approach the $250 billion revenue mark. The decisive factor is the proposal from former President Trump, the Republican nominee, for a 10% universal tariff. This policy is not yet law, and its implementation would face legal, legislative, and logistical hurdles. The Treasury Department's reporting for the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2025, which began in October 2024, will provide the earliest concrete data on whether revenue collection is on a trajectory toward the target.
U.S. customs duties, commonly called tariffs, are taxes levied by the federal government on goods imported into the country. They are paid by importers at the port of entry and are calculated as a percentage of the goods' value (ad valorem tariffs) or a fixed fee per unit. The revenue is collected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and reported by the Treasury Department.
In Fiscal Year 2024, which ended on September 30, 2024, the U.S. government collected $82.2 billion in customs duties according to the Treasury Department's Financial Report. This is the most recent full-year figure and serves as the baseline for the prediction market's question about FY 2025.
Revenue reaching $250 billion would require a major policy change, such as the implementation of a new, broad-based tariff like the proposed 10% universal tariff on all imports. It would also likely involve significantly increasing rates on major trading partners like China, potentially to 60% or more, and applying tariffs to categories of goods that are currently duty-free.
Tariffs are legally paid by U.S. registered importers, which are often American subsidiaries of foreign companies or domestic firms that purchase goods from abroad. Economists generally agree that the cost of tariffs is often passed through the supply chain, ultimately borne by U.S. consumers through higher prices and by U.S. companies through increased costs for inputs.
The definitive source is the annual Financial Report of the United States Government, published by the Department of the Treasury. The data for customs duties is typically found in the notes to the financial statements. Monthly data can also be tracked through the Treasury's Monthly Treasury Statement.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!

No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/5bh08T" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Will tariffs generate >$250b in 2025?"></iframe>