
$26.46K
1
1

1 market tracked
No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
Will Israel and Syria normalize relations before Jan 20, 2029? | Kalshi | 31% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
Before Trump's term ends If Israel and Syria normalize diplomatic relations before Jan 20, 2029, then the market resolves to Yes. Early close condition: This market will close and expire early if the event occurs. This market will close and expire early if the event occurs.
Prediction markets currently assign a low 32% probability that Israel and Syria will normalize diplomatic relations before January 20, 2029. This price, trading exclusively on Kalshi with approximately $26,000 in volume, indicates the market views a breakthrough in relations as unlikely within the specified timeframe. A 32% chance suggests traders see a normalization agreement as a significant geopolitical longshot, though not entirely impossible.
The primary factor suppressing the probability is the entrenched state of hostility and complex proxy dynamics between Israel and Syria. Syria remains a close ally of Iran, Israel's primary regional adversary, and hosts Iranian military personnel and Tehran-backed militias like Hezbollah. Normalization would require a fundamental realignment of Syria's alliances, which is currently improbable given the Assad regime's dependence on Iranian support for its survival.
Furthermore, the ongoing state of war and territorial disputes, including Israel's control of the Golan Heights which it annexed in 1981, presents a massive bilateral obstacle. The Syrian civil war and Israel's frequent airstrikes on Iranian targets within Syria have deepened security tensions, making diplomatic engagement a distant prospect.
A major geopolitical shift could alter this outlook. If a future U.S. administration, particularly a potential second Trump term, aggressively brokers a deal and offers substantial incentives to both Damascus and Tehran, it could create an opening. Similarly, a fundamental change in Syria's relationship with Iran, or a successful regional effort to reintegrate Syria diplomatically and economically, could provide a pathway. However, these scenarios are considered low-probability events by the market, reflected in the current 32% price. Monitoring high-level diplomatic statements or unexpected bilateral meetings would be key indicators of a potential shift in the odds.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$26.46K
1
1
This prediction market topic concerns whether Israel and Syria will establish normalized diplomatic relations before January 20, 2029, which marks the end of the potential second term of former U.S. President Donald Trump. Normalization would involve the establishment of formal diplomatic ties, including embassies and official recognition, ending a state of war that has technically existed since 1948. The question is framed within the context of the Trump administration's foreign policy legacy, particularly its role in brokering the Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab states. The topic has gained renewed attention due to shifting regional dynamics, including Syria's gradual reintegration into the Arab League and ongoing, albeit indirect, negotiations between Israeli and Syrian officials, often mediated by third parties like Russia. Analysts are interested because such a breakthrough would represent one of the most significant geopolitical realignments in the Middle East, fundamentally altering regional security architecture and potentially isolating Iran, a key backer of the Syrian government.
The Israeli-Syrian conflict is one of the longest standing in the Middle East. Syria participated in the 1948 Arab Israeli war against the newly declared State of Israel, and the two nations have technically remained in a state of war ever since. The major territorial dispute centers on the Golan Heights, a strategic plateau captured by Israel from Syria during the Six Day War in June 1967. Israel effectively annexed the territory in 1981, a move not recognized internationally. Despite the conflict, there have been serious attempts at peace. Secret and public negotiations occurred intermittently, most notably in the 1990s and 2000s. In 2000, talks between Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and Syrian Foreign Minister Farouk al Shara, mediated by U.S. President Bill Clinton, collapsed over the depth of Israeli withdrawal from the Golan. Another round of indirect talks, mediated by Turkey, took place in 2008 during the tenure of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. These historical negotiations established a rough framework where 'land for peace' was the central principle, but they ultimately failed due to disagreements on security arrangements, water rights, and the timing of normalization.
Normalization between Israel and Syria would have profound geopolitical consequences. It would represent a major setback for Iran's 'axis of resistance' in the region, potentially limiting Tehran's ability to project power via Syria and threatening the operational freedom of its proxy, Hezbollah, in Lebanon. This could significantly reduce the risk of a major regional war. Economically, peace could unlock substantial opportunities. It could lead to the reopening of borders, facilitating trade, tourism, and energy cooperation. Syria, devastated by over a decade of civil war, could attract reconstruction investment, with Israeli technology and capital potentially playing a role. For Israel, it would secure its northeastern border, allowing a reallocation of military resources. However, the social impact within Syria would be complex. While some citizens might welcome economic relief, normalization with Israel remains deeply unpopular among many Syrians and could provoke backlash from powerful Iranian backed factions within the country, risking internal instability.
As of late 2024, Israel and Syria do not have diplomatic relations and the Golan Heights remains under Israeli control. However, low level engagement persists. In recent years, there have been reports of indirect communications, often facilitated by Russian or Arab intermediaries. The Syrian government, having regained most territory with Russian and Iranian help, is focused on political and economic reintegration into the Arab world, a process that accelerated with its readmission to the Arab League in 2023. Israel continues its policy of conducting frequent airstrikes in Syria targeting Iranian weapons transfers and militia positions. The prospect of a second Trump term has introduced speculation about a more aggressive U.S. push for diplomatic breakthroughs in the region, potentially reviving the 'maximum pressure' campaign on Iran, which could indirectly create conditions for an Israeli Syrian deal.
The primary obstacle is the status of the Golan Heights. Syria demands a full Israeli withdrawal to the pre 1967 borders, while Israel views the territory as vital for security and has settled it. Secondary obstacles include Syria's alliance with Iran, the future of Iranian militias in Syria, security guarantees, water rights, and the deep seated mutual distrust from decades of conflict.
No, Israel and Syria have never signed a peace treaty or established normal diplomatic relations. They have been in a formal state of war since Israel's founding in 1948. There have been armistice agreements and a disengagement agreement following the 1973 war, but these are military arrangements, not peace.
Past talks, most seriously in 2000 and 2008, failed primarily over the scope of Israeli withdrawal from the Golan Heights. Disagreements included the exact border line, security arrangements, water access from the Sea of Galilee, and the sequencing of steps. Domestic political opposition in both countries, and changing regional alliances, also contributed to the collapse of negotiations.
The Abraham Accords are a series of U.S. brokered agreements in 2020 that normalized diplomatic relations between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan, and Morocco. Syria was not a party to these accords. The accords created a new paradigm for Arab Israeli normalization without resolving the Palestinian issue, which could influence future talks with Syria.
Iran is a decisive spoiler. It is the Syrian government's main financial and military patron, deploying Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps advisors and directing proxy militias there. Iran uses Syrian territory to transfer weapons to Hezbollah in Lebanon. Israel views this as an existential threat and insists on the removal of Iranian forces as a precondition for any stable peace with Syria.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!
No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/81rnze" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Will Israel and Syria normalize relations during Trump's term?"></iframe>