$234.25K
1
30
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve according to the team that finishes with the worst regular season record in the NBA for the 2025-2026 Season. If multiple teams finish with identical records, the league’s tiebreaker rules will be used to determine the worst record. If it becomes impossible for the listed team to finish with the worst record based on the rules of the NBA, the market for that team may resolve to “No”. The primary resolution source for this market is official information from the NBA
Prediction markets currently assign a low probability to the Indiana Pacers finishing with the worst record in the NBA for the 2025-2026 season. The leading contract on Polymarket trades at 32 cents, implying the market sees only about a one-in-three chance of this outcome. This pricing suggests that while the Pacers are considered a potential candidate for the league's basement, they are far from the consensus favorite. With 30 teams in the league, a purely random chance would be roughly 3.3%, making the Pacers' 32% probability a significant elevation, but still indicating the market views other teams as more likely to finish last.
The primary factor driving this assessment is the Pacers' current roster construction and recent performance trajectory. Indiana is a young team led by All-Star guard Tyrese Haliburton, and they reached the Eastern Conference Finals in 2024. This core suggests a floor of moderate competitiveness. However, the 32% probability reflects real concerns about roster stability and defensive shortcomings that could lead to a steep decline. The market is likely pricing in scenarios where key injuries, a lack of defensive improvement, or a strategic pivot toward asset accumulation (tanking) could derail their season, placing them in contention for the worst record.
The odds will be highly sensitive to offseason moves and early-season performance. A major trade involving a cornerstone player like Haliburton or Pascal Siakam before the season starts would dramatically increase this probability, potentially making the Pacers a favorite for the worst record. Conversely, a successful free agency period or significant internal development from their young core would see these odds contract sharply. Once the season begins, monitoring the team's health, particularly Haliburton's status, and their performance in the first 20-30 games will be critical. A disastrous start against a tough schedule could cause this market to spike, while a competitive opening would make the current 32% price look expensive.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
The NBA Worst Record prediction market focuses on identifying which team will finish with the poorest regular season performance during the 2025-2026 NBA season. This market resolves based on official NBA standings and employs league tiebreaker procedures if multiple teams share identical win-loss records. The topic represents a significant intersection of sports analytics, team management strategy, and fan engagement, as finishing with the worst record historically provides the highest probability of securing the top pick in the subsequent NBA Draft under the league's lottery system. This creates a complex dynamic where on-court failure can be strategically leveraged for future success, a phenomenon often colloquially referred to as 'tanking.' Interest in this market extends beyond casual fans to include sports bettors, fantasy league participants, and analysts who monitor team construction, injury reports, and organizational direction for competitive advantage. The 2025-2026 season is particularly noteworthy as it will be the first full season following the implementation of the NBA's new media rights deals, which could influence team payrolls and competitive balance. Furthermore, the anticipated 2026 draft class is projected to be strong, potentially intensifying the strategic calculus for teams at the bottom of the standings.
The strategic pursuit of a poor record for draft positioning, often termed 'tanking,' has a defined history in the NBA. A pivotal moment was the 1997 season, where multiple teams were suspected of losing games to improve their odds of drafting Tim Duncan. The San Antonio Spurs won the lottery with the third-best odds and selected Duncan, a move that led to two decades of championship contention. This event cemented the perceived value of a top pick in the public and front-office consciousness. In response to widespread criticism of non-competitive seasons, the NBA has repeatedly adjusted its draft lottery system. The most significant reform came in 2019, flattening the odds so that the three worst teams each have a 14.0 percent chance at the top pick, compared to the previous system where the worst team had a 25.0 percent chance. This was designed to reduce the incentive for being the absolute worst. Historically, teams like the 2011-2012 Charlotte Bobcats (7-59, a .106 winning percentage) and the 2015-2016 Philadelphia 76ers (10-72) have posted historically poor records during explicit rebuilding phases, with the 76ers' 'Process' era becoming the most famous modern example of strategic asset accumulation through losing seasons.
The race for the NBA's worst record has significant implications for the league's competitive integrity and economic landscape. It tests the effectiveness of the NBA's anti-tanking policies and influences fan engagement, as protracted losing can erode local ticket sales and television ratings for affected franchises. For the teams involved, securing a top draft pick can accelerate a rebuild by years, potentially adding a franchise-altering player on a cost-controlled rookie contract, which is crucial under the league's salary cap system. Conversely, misjudging this strategy can lead to prolonged mediocrity, damaging a franchise's brand and financial stability. Beyond individual teams, the outcome shapes the future competitive balance of the league. A generational talent entering through the draft can shift power dynamics for a decade, as seen with LeBron James in 2003 or Tim Duncan in 1997. The market also serves as a barometer for front-office philosophy, indicating which organizations are prioritizing immediate competitiveness versus long-term asset building, decisions that have profound consequences for players, coaches, and entire fan bases.
As of the 2024 offseason, the landscape for the 2025-2026 worst record is taking shape. Several teams, including the Detroit Pistons, Washington Wizards, and Portland Trail Blazers, are in clear rebuilding phases with young rosters, making them early speculative candidates. The 2025 NBA Draft is not considered to have a prospect on the level of Victor Wembanyama, which may moderate some tanking incentives for the preceding season. However, the 2026 draft class is already generating buzz among scouts, potentially making the 2025-2026 season a pivotal one for teams aiming to position themselves for a high pick. Key variables such as offseason trades, free agency moves, and potential injuries to star players on borderline teams will crystallize the picture closer to the start of the 2025-2026 regular season.
If two or more teams finish with the same record, the NBA uses a series of tiebreakers to determine draft order for non-playoff teams. The first tiebreaker is head-to-head record between the tied teams. If that is equal, it proceeds to division record (if the teams are in the same division), then conference record, and finally a random drawing.
No. Since the draft lottery was introduced in 1985, the team with the worst record has not always received the first pick. Under the current odds established in 2019, the worst team has only a 14 percent chance of winning the lottery, meaning they are more likely to pick 5th than 1st.
Tanking is a strategy where a team intentionally fields a non-competitive roster or limits the minutes of its best players to lose games and improve its odds of securing a higher draft pick. The NBA has implemented rules like flattened lottery odds and increased league scrutiny to discourage this practice.
The Los Angeles Clippers and Sacramento Kings share the record for most seasons with the worst record in the NBA, each having finished with the poorest win-loss tally six times in their franchise histories, reflecting periods of prolonged struggle.
The teams share the identical lottery odds for their position. For example, if two teams tie for the worst record, they would split the combined odds for the 1st and 2nd worst positions, each receiving a 14.0 percent chance at the top pick, with a drawing to determine which team gets the slightly better odds if needed for subsequent picks.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!
30 markets tracked
No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Poly | 32% |
| Poly | 26% |
| Poly | 17% |
| Poly | 16% |
| Poly | 3% |
| Poly | 3% |
| Poly | 2% |
| Poly | 2% |
| Poly | 2% |
| Poly | 2% |
| Poly | 1% |
| Poly | 1% |
| Poly | 1% |
| Poly | 1% |
| Poly | 1% |
| Poly | 1% |
| Poly | 1% |
| Poly | 1% |
| Poly | 0% |
| Poly | 0% |
| Poly | 0% |
| Poly | 0% |
| Poly | 0% |
| Poly | 0% |
| Poly | 0% |
| Poly | 0% |
| Poly | 0% |
| Poly | 0% |
| Poly | 0% |
| Poly | 0% |
No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/8RbS4D" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="NBA Worst Record"></iframe>