
$39.67K
1
1

1 market tracked
No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
Will a court find that OpenAI has infringed the copyright of the New York Times? | Kalshi | 58% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
Copyright infringement If the Southern District of New York has found OpenAI liable for copyright infringement (or any of the counts alleged by the Times), then the market resolves to Yes. Early close condition: If this event occurs, the market will close the following 10am ET. If this event occurs, the market will close the following 10am ET.
Prediction markets currently assign a 59% probability that a court will find OpenAI liable for copyright infringement against The New York Times. This price, trading on Kalshi, indicates the market views a ruling against OpenAI as slightly more likely than not, but remains highly uncertain. With approximately $40,000 in total volume, liquidity is thin, suggesting this consensus is tentative and could shift significantly with new information.
The market's lean toward a "Yes" outcome is primarily driven by the strength of the Times's legal complaint filed in December 2023. The complaint presented extensive evidence of verbatim text reproduction by OpenAI's models, a compelling factor for direct copyright infringement. Furthermore, legal precedent in the Southern District of New York, a venue known for its expertise in copyright law, may favor a rigorous interpretation of fair use, which OpenAI is expected to claim. The market is likely pricing in the high resource level and legal diligence of the Times, making a dismissal of the core claims seem less probable.
The primary catalyst for odds movement will be major procedural rulings, such as a decision on OpenAI's motion to dismiss, which could come in the coming months. A ruling allowing the case to proceed to discovery would likely increase the "Yes" probability, while a dismissal of key counts would crash it. Furthermore, developments in related AI copyright lawsuits, like those involving authors or visual artists, could set persuasive precedents. The market is also sensitive to any announced settlement negotiations, which would immediately shift probability toward a resolution without a formal finding of liability.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$39.67K
1
1
This prediction market topic concerns the outcome of a landmark copyright infringement lawsuit filed by The New York Times Company against OpenAI and its primary investor, Microsoft. The case, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in December 2023, alleges that OpenAI's large language models, including ChatGPT, were trained on millions of copyrighted New York Times articles without permission or compensation. The lawsuit claims this constitutes massive copyright infringement and seeks billions in damages. The market resolves to 'Yes' if the court finds OpenAI liable for copyright infringement or any of the other counts alleged by the Times, which include vicarious copyright infringement, removal of copyright management information, unfair competition, and trademark dilution. The case is widely viewed as a pivotal legal battle that will define the boundaries of copyright law in the age of artificial intelligence, testing the applicability of fair use doctrines to the training of generative AI systems on copyrighted material. Interest in the outcome is high among media companies, technology firms, legal scholars, and investors, as it could establish a precedent affecting the entire AI industry's development practices and potentially impose significant financial liabilities on AI developers.
The legal confrontation between content creators and AI companies has been building for years. The foundational issue traces back to the 2014 Authors Guild v. Google case, where the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Google's scanning of books for a searchable database was transformative fair use. This precedent is central to OpenAI's likely defense. More recently, a series of lawsuits in 2022 and 2023 set the stage for the Times's action. In January 2023, a class-action lawsuit was filed by artists against Stability AI, Midjourney, and DeviantArt, alleging copyright infringement through AI image generation. In July 2023, authors including Sarah Silverman and Christopher Golden filed suits against Meta and OpenAI, claiming their books were used to train AI models without consent. The New York Times lawsuit, filed on December 27, 2023, represents the most significant escalation, as it involves a major corporation with vast resources and a direct claim of market harm. Historically, courts have grappled with applying copyright law to new technologies, from photocopiers to video recorders to internet search engines, with the doctrine of fair use often expanding to accommodate technological progress. This case continues that tradition, applying centuries-old legal principles to 21st-century artificial intelligence.
The outcome of this lawsuit carries profound implications for the future of both artificial intelligence and creative industries. A ruling against OpenAI could establish that training generative AI on copyrighted material requires explicit licensing, potentially adding billions in costs to AI development and slowing innovation. It could trigger a wave of similar lawsuits from other publishers, news agencies, and content creators, creating a complex web of legal liabilities for AI companies. Conversely, a ruling for OpenAI could solidify a legal framework allowing widespread use of copyrighted works for AI training under fair use, potentially devaluing proprietary content and forcing media companies to find new business models. Beyond the immediate parties, the case will influence global regulatory approaches to AI. Legislators in the U.S., E.U., and elsewhere are watching closely, as the court's interpretation could inform new laws governing AI data sourcing. The case also raises fundamental questions about the ownership of information in the digital age and how society balances incentivizing innovation with protecting intellectual property rights.
As of early 2024, the case is in its initial stages within the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. OpenAI and Microsoft filed motions to dismiss portions of the lawsuit in February 2024, arguing that the Times's claims do not adequately allege copyright infringement that surpasses fair use protections. The New York Times filed its opposition to these motions in March 2024, defending the strength of its complaint. The court has not yet ruled on these motions. The discovery process, where both sides exchange evidence, is anticipated to begin later in 2024 if the case proceeds. Both parties are preparing for what is expected to be lengthy and complex litigation, with legal experts predicting the case could take years to reach a final resolution, potentially including appeals to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.
The New York Times alleges that OpenAI used millions of its copyrighted news articles, investigations, and other content to train its AI models like ChatGPT without permission or payment. The Times claims this constitutes copyright infringement and that ChatGPT can now generate output that competes with and mimics its journalism.
Fair use is a legal doctrine that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, or research. OpenAI is expected to argue that using publicly available text to train AI is a transformative, fair use that does not harm the market for the original work.
A ruling against OpenAI would set a powerful legal precedent, likely prompting lawsuits against other AI firms that used similar training data. It could force the entire industry to seek licenses for training data or develop expensive new methods to filter out copyrighted content, increasing costs and potentially slowing development.
If the Times wins, OpenAI could be found liable for copyright infringement and ordered to pay substantial statutory and actual damages, potentially totaling billions of dollars. The court could also issue an injunction requiring OpenAI to destroy AI models trained on Times data and refrain from future unauthorized use.
Yes, Microsoft is named as a co-defendant. The lawsuit alleges Microsoft is liable as a contributory infringer due to its deep integration of OpenAI's technology into its products and its substantial financial investment, which the Times claims enabled and encouraged the alleged infringement.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!
No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/AGVhFN" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="New York Times wins OpenAI lawsuit?"></iframe>