
$7.24K
1
1

1 market tracked

No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Poly | 6% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve to "Yes" if any country named in President Donald Trump’s December 16, 2025, proclamation titled “Restricting and Limiting the Entry of Foreign Nationals to Protect the Security of the United States” is fully removed from the list of countries subject to full or partial entry suspensions by January 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A country will be considered "removed" if any of the following occur: - The President or Executive Branch
Prediction markets currently assign a low 6% probability that any country from President Trump's December 2025 travel ban proclamation will be fully removed from the entry suspension list by the January 31, 2026 deadline. This price, equivalent to a 94% implied probability for "No," indicates the market views a reversal or significant modification of the executive order within the next 15 days as highly unlikely. The thin trading volume of approximately $7,000 suggests limited speculative interest or consensus around this specific near-term outcome.
Two primary factors are suppressing the odds. First, the political timeline is exceptionally tight. A proclamation of this nature is a core executive policy, and any formal removal process would require a new executive order or legal intervention. With only two weeks until resolution, there is minimal time for such a significant policy reversal absent a major external catalyst. Second, the market reflects the historical precedent of policy stability during the initial implementation phase of such orders. The original 2017 travel ban faced protracted legal challenges but was not swiftly rescinded, setting a pattern that traders are likely pricing in. The current low probability suggests traders see this proclamation as a settled policy position for the immediate future.
A dramatic shift in these odds would require a near-term, high-impact catalyst. The most plausible scenario for a "Yes" resolution would be a sudden, unforeseen court injunction from a federal judge that fully suspends the ban's application for at least one listed country before the deadline. Alternatively, an unexpected political compromise or a major international event forcing a rapid policy reversal could act as a catalyst. However, given the compressed timeline and the absence of any such developments currently in the news cycle, the market's skeptical stance appears firmly anchored. Monitoring federal court dockets in districts known for immigration litigation in the coming days would be the primary indicator of a potential probability shift.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$7.24K
1
1
This prediction market topic concerns the potential removal of countries from President Donald Trump's December 16, 2025, travel ban proclamation before January 31, 2026. The proclamation, formally titled 'Restricting and Limiting the Entry of Foreign Nationals to Protect the Security of the United States,' represents the latest iteration of executive actions restricting entry from specific nations, a policy framework first introduced in 2017. The market resolves to 'Yes' if any country named in the 2025 proclamation is fully removed from the list of nations subject to entry suspensions by the deadline. A removal is defined as an official action by the President, the Executive Branch, or a federal court that eliminates all entry restrictions for that country's nationals. This topic sits at the intersection of immigration policy, national security, executive authority, and international relations, generating significant public and political interest. The specific January 31, 2026, deadline creates a clear timeframe for assessing policy stability during the early phase of a potential second Trump term or the final days of another administration, making it a focal point for observers tracking the durability and evolution of U.S. immigration restrictions. The outcome has direct implications for thousands of prospective travelers, students, and immigrants, as well as for diplomatic relations with the affected countries.
The travel ban policy originated on January 27, 2017, when President Trump signed Executive Order 13769, 'Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States.' This first version imposed a 90-day entry ban on nationals from seven Muslim-majority countries, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen, and sparked immediate legal challenges and widespread protests at airports. A revised order, Executive Order 13780, was issued on March 6, 2017, removing Iraq from the list and clarifying exemptions. After further litigation, the policy was formalized through a presidential proclamation, Proclamation 9645, on September 24, 2017. This third version added non-Muslim-majority countries Chad, North Korea, and Venezuela, and removed Sudan. The Supreme Court ultimately upheld this proclamation in a 5-4 decision in Trump v. Hawaii on June 26, 2018, ruling the President had broad statutory authority to suspend entry. A subsequent proclamation in January 2020, Proclamation 9983, added restrictions on six additional countries, including Nigeria and Myanmar. The December 2025 proclamation represents a continuation and potential expansion of this executive policy framework, which has remained a contentious feature of U.S. immigration law for nearly a decade.
The removal or maintenance of the travel ban has profound implications beyond immigration paperwork. For the affected countries, it represents a significant diplomatic statement, potentially straining bilateral relations, hindering academic and cultural exchanges, and impacting economic ties. Within the United States, the policy continues to shape the nation's global image regarding religious freedom and equality. Families remain separated, U.S. universities lose talented students and scholars, and businesses face hurdles in recruiting skilled workers from listed nations. The legal precedents set by challenges to the ban directly influence the scope of presidential power over immigration, a foundational question in U.S. constitutional law. A removal of a country could signal a shift in security assessments or diplomatic rapprochement, while the list's stability reinforces a long-term policy of restrictive entry based on nationality. The outcome of this specific question by January 31, 2026, will serve as a key indicator of the policy's flexibility or rigidity in the face of legal, political, and international pressures.
As of late 2025, President Trump's December 16 proclamation is the active governing policy. The specific list of countries named in the 2025 order has not been publicly disclosed in available sources, but it is understood to be a successor to previous proclamations. Legal challenges to the new proclamation are anticipated but their filing and progress through the courts will be a critical factor in the lead-up to the January 31, 2026, deadline. The political environment, including the outcome of the 2024 presidential election and the composition of Congress, will heavily influence the pressure on the administration to modify the list. Diplomatic engagements between the U.S. State Department and governments of listed countries are ongoing but their outcomes remain uncertain.
In Trump v. Hawaii, the Court's majority held that federal immigration law, specifically 8 U.S.C. § 1182(f), grants the President 'broad discretion' to suspend the entry of 'any class of aliens' deemed detrimental to U.S. interests. The Court deferred to the executive branch's stated national security justification, finding the proclamation was 'squarely within the scope of Presidential authority.'
Yes, based on the precedent set by the 2018 Supreme Court ruling and existing immigration statute, the President retains the authority to issue new proclamations modifying the list of restricted countries. The December 2025 proclamation itself is an example of this executive power being exercised to potentially update the list.
Historically, removal has occurred through executive action when the administration determines a country has improved its information-sharing practices and cooperation with U.S. security vetting protocols. Iraq's removal in 2017 is the key example. Removal can also be compelled by a federal court issuing a valid injunction applicable to that specific country.
The policy is commonly called a 'travel ban,' but its primary mechanism is the restriction or suspension of visa issuance for certain nationals. It also affects entry at U.S. borders for those with valid visas or from visa-waiver countries. The proclamation directly instructs the Secretary of State to implement visa restrictions for covered nationals.
Yes, Iraq was removed from the list in the revised executive order of March 2017. Chad was also removed from the list by a separate presidential proclamation in April 2018 after the U.S. government assessed it had improved its identity-management and information-sharing practices.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!

No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/DzJB1c" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Trump's travel ban removed by January 31?"></iframe>