
$170.69K
1
1

1 market tracked
No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
Will the 22nd Amendment be repealed or reinterpreted to let Presidents run for a third term before Jan 1, 2029 | Kalshi | 10% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
Before 2029 If the 22nd Amendment has been repealed by a subsequent Constitutional Amendment, or if the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in an opinion or judgment that the 22nd Amendment permits individuals to be elected to the Presidency at least thrice under at least some circumstances, before Jan 1, 2029, then the market resolves to Yes. Early close condition: If this event occurs, the market will close and expire early. If this event occurs, the market will close and expire earl
Prediction markets currently assign a low probability to the 22nd Amendment being repealed or reinterpreted to allow a third presidential term before 2029. On Kalshi, the "Yes" share trades at approximately 10 cents, implying just a 10% chance. This pricing indicates the market views the event as highly unlikely, though not impossible. With over $171,000 in volume, the market has moderate liquidity, suggesting meaningful trader engagement on this constitutional question.
The low probability is anchored in the immense historical and political difficulty of amending the U.S. Constitution. The 22nd Amendment, ratified in 1951, has never been seriously challenged. A repeal would require a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate, followed by ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures, a monumental hurdle in the current polarized environment. Furthermore, there is no significant political movement or bipartisan support advocating for such a change. While the Supreme Court could theoretically reinterpret the amendment, there is no active legal case or doctrinal shift suggesting this is a plausible near-term scenario. The market effectively prices in extreme institutional stability on this issue.
The primary catalyst for a major shift in odds would be the emergence of a concerted, high-level political campaign to repeal the amendment, likely requiring a president to publicly champion the effort and rally supermajority support in Congress. A surprise Supreme Court case directly challenging term limits could also force a reassessment, though no such case is on the horizon. The market's 2029 deadline is a key constraint, making any change an extraordinarily fast process by constitutional standards. A significant price move would likely only occur if a major political party formally adopted repeal as a platform plank or if a sitting president tested the limit through a novel legal theory, events currently seen as remote possibilities.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$170.69K
1
1
This prediction market topic addresses whether Donald Trump will be legally permitted to run for a third term as President of the United States before January 1, 2029. The market resolves to 'Yes' if, before that date, the 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is repealed by a subsequent amendment, or if the Supreme Court issues a ruling that the 22nd Amendment allows individuals to be elected president at least three times under some circumstances. The 22nd Amendment, ratified in 1951, explicitly states that 'No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.' This topic has gained significant attention due to Donald Trump's continued prominence in American politics following his 2020 election loss and his declared candidacy for the 2024 presidential election. While a direct challenge to the amendment's core limit has not been a central part of Trump's public platform, speculation about potential legal or political maneuvers has emerged in political commentary and academic circles, fueled by broader debates about executive power and constitutional interpretation. The topic intersects with ongoing discussions about the stability of democratic norms and the mechanisms for constitutional change in the United States.
The modern presidential term limit was established by the 22nd Amendment, proposed by Congress in 1947 and ratified by the requisite number of states on February 27, 1951. It was a direct reaction to Franklin D. Roosevelt's unprecedented four electoral victories (1932, 1936, 1940, 1944), breaking the two-term tradition established by George Washington. The amendment's text is clear in its prohibition, stating a person cannot be 'elected' more than twice. It also includes a specific clause affecting Harry S. Truman, who was president at the time of its proposal, stating it did not apply to the sitting president. Since its ratification, no serious attempt to repeal the 22nd Amendment has succeeded. A repeal effort was debated in Congress in the late 1950s but failed. The only presidents affected by it who later sought a return to office were Dwight D. Eisenhower, who was term-limited, and more recently, Donald Trump, who is seeking a return after one term. The historical precedent is one of strict adherence to the amendment's literal meaning, with no judicial challenges to its core limitation ever reaching the Supreme Court.
The question of a third term for Donald Trump touches on fundamental principles of American democracy and constitutional governance. The 22nd Amendment is a cornerstone of the post-World War II constitutional order, designed explicitly to prevent the consolidation of prolonged executive power. Altering or circumventing this limit would represent one of the most significant changes to the structure of the U.S. government in decades, potentially reshaping the balance of power between branches and across electoral cycles. Beyond the immediate political implications for Trump and his supporters, such a change would set a powerful precedent for future presidents, potentially opening the door to longer tenures and challenging the rotational model of leadership that has defined the American presidency. The process itself, whether through a contentious Supreme Court ruling or a nearly impossible amendment ratification, would likely trigger profound political and social upheaval, testing the resilience of American political institutions and deepening existing partisan divisions.
As of late 2024, there is no active legislative movement in the U.S. Congress to propose an amendment repealing the 22nd Amendment. Similarly, no significant, credible legal challenge questioning the amendment's application to a former president like Donald Trump, who served one term, is working its way through the federal court system with the potential to reach the Supreme Court. Donald Trump is the presumptive Republican nominee for the 2024 presidential election, focusing his campaign on a return to office for a second term, not a third. Public discussion of a potential third term remains confined to political commentary, speculative analysis, and prediction markets like this one, rather than concrete political or legal action. The constitutional and political barriers remain as high as they have been since 1951.
Yes. The 22nd Amendment limits a person to being 'elected' president twice. It does not prohibit non-consecutive terms. A president who served one term, lost, and was later re-elected could serve a second term, as Grover Cleveland did in the 19th century before the amendment existed.
Yes, but not successfully. The most notable attempt was in 1956, when a repeal resolution was introduced in the Senate but failed to pass. Since then, occasional proposals have been made by individual lawmakers but have never gained serious momentum in Congress.
The Supreme Court has the power of judicial review, but the text of the 22nd Amendment is exceptionally clear. Legal scholars widely consider a judicial reinterpretation allowing a third elected term to be extremely unlikely, as it would require overturning the plain meaning of the constitutional text.
The 22nd Amendment states that no one who has served more than two years of a term to which another person was elected can then be elected more than once. This means a vice president who succeeds a president could potentially serve up to ten years if they serve less than two years of the predecessor's term and are then elected twice.
There is no set time limit unless Congress imposes one. The 27th Amendment was ratified over 200 years after it was proposed. However, modern amendments like the 26th (voting age) were ratified in just a few months, showing the process depends entirely on political consensus.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!
No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/Iyjy9X" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Will Trump be allowed to run for a 3rd term?"></iframe>