
$3.68K
1
1

1 market tracked

No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Poly | 5% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve to "Yes" if any house of any US state legislature holds a vote, as part of its standard legislative process, on a bill, resolution, or constitutional amendment whose main purpose is for the state to secede from the United States, or to otherwise declare its support for such a secession, by June 30, 2026 ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A qualifying measure must clearly state its purpose as part of a process for the state to leave, withdraw from, dissolve
Prediction markets currently assign a low probability to any US state legislature voting on secession by June 30, 2026. On Polymarket, the "Yes" share trades at approximately 5¢, implying just a 5% chance. This pricing indicates the market views a formal secession vote as a highly unlikely, though non-zero, political event within the next two years. The thin trading volume of around $4,000 suggests limited speculative interest, reinforcing the consensus that this is a remote possibility.
The primary factor suppressing the probability is the settled legal and political precedent against state secession. The Supreme Court ruled in Texas v. White (1869) that states cannot unilaterally secede, establishing a constitutional bedrock that makes any secession measure symbolic at best. Modern political movements advocating for secession, such as those in Texas or California, have consistently failed to gain mainstream traction or reach formal legislative votes. State legislatures are generally focused on practical governance, and leadership in both major parties strongly opposes secessionist actions, viewing them as destabilizing and legally futile.
The odds could shift slightly upward only under a highly specific and extreme political scenario. A profound and sustained constitutional crisis, perhaps following a disputed 2024 presidential election or a major federal-state conflict over policy, could incentivize a symbolic legislative vote as a political protest. However, even then, the legal barriers and severe economic repercussions make an actual secession vote a tool of last resort. The market's timeline to June 2026 encompasses the entire 2025-2026 legislative sessions, providing a window for unexpected political shocks. A key catalyst to watch would be the platforming of secessionist rhetoric by a major political figure or party, though this remains outside current mainstream discourse.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$3.68K
1
1
This prediction market addresses whether any U.S. state legislature will vote on a measure advocating for secession from the United States by June 30, 2026. The market resolves to 'Yes' if any legislative chamber, as part of its standard process, votes on a bill, resolution, or constitutional amendment whose primary purpose is to initiate or declare support for the state's withdrawal from the union. This topic sits at the intersection of constitutional law, political theory, and contemporary American political polarization. While secession is widely considered legally settled as impermissible following the Civil War and Supreme Court precedent, symbolic or exploratory legislative actions have periodically emerged, often as political statements rather than genuine attempts at dissolution. Recent years have seen increased rhetorical calls for secession or 'national divorce' from certain political factions, particularly following contentious elections or federal policy disputes. This market gauges whether such rhetoric will translate into formal legislative action at the state level, reflecting deeper currents of political alienation and regional division within the United States. Interest stems from observers monitoring the stability of the federal system, the boundaries of political discourse, and the potential for symbolic challenges to national unity to gain institutional traction.
The legal and historical context of state secession is defined by the American Civil War (1861-1865). Following the secession of eleven Southern states and the formation of the Confederacy, the war concluded with the defeat of the secessionist cause. The Supreme Court subsequently ruled in Texas v. White (1869) that the union of states was 'indissoluble' and that secession was constitutionally invalid. This established the precedent that states cannot unilaterally leave the Union. In the modern era, secessionist sentiment has largely been confined to symbolic or fringe movements, though it occasionally surfaces in political rhetoric. For example, following the re-election of President Barack Obama in 2012, secession petitions from all 50 states were filed on the White House's 'We the People' website, though none garnered an official response advocating for secession. The 2021 filing of the Texas independence referendum bill was a more formal, though unsuccessful, legislative attempt. Historically, these movements gain brief traction during periods of intense national political conflict but are consistently blocked by legal precedent, political consensus, and the immense practical barriers to dissolution.
The consideration of secession legislation, even symbolically, matters because it tests the resilience of the American federal system and the social contract that binds the states. A formal legislative vote would represent an institutional escalation of political grievances, moving beyond rhetoric to a recorded act of dissent within a government body. This could further normalize the concept of dissolution as a political tool, potentially destabilizing interstate relations, investment, and long-term governance. Economically, even the discussion of secession can create uncertainty, potentially affecting bond ratings, business investment, and federal funding allocations for a state. Socially, it deepens narratives of irreconcilable division, impacting national cohesion and the shared sense of civic identity. The downstream consequences include the potential for copycat legislation in other states, increased political polarization, and a diversion of legislative attention from pressing policy issues to constitutional brinkmanship.
As of late 2024, no U.S. state legislature has held a floor vote on a secession measure in recent years. The most recent notable attempt was Texas HB 1359 in 2021, which died in committee. However, rhetoric around 'national divorce' or state sovereignty continues in certain political circles, particularly online and among some far-right factions. The Texas Republican Party's 2022 platform included language asserting the state's right to secede, though this is a party document, not legislation. Legislative activity remains dormant, with no major secession bills reported as formally introduced or scheduled for committee hearings in any statehouse at the start of 2025. The political energy appears focused on other states' rights issues, such as contesting federal mandates, rather than direct secession proposals.
According to the Supreme Court's 1869 decision in Texas v. White, unilateral secession is not legal. The Court ruled that the Union is 'indissoluble' and that the Constitution does not provide a right for states to secede. Any lawful separation would require a constitutional amendment or a revolutionary act outside the existing legal framework.
Texas has the most organized and historically persistent secessionist movement, often called the 'Texas Nationalist Movement' or 'Texit.' This is due to its history as an independent republic, its strong state identity, and periodic political rhetoric from state officials. However, even in Texas, such proposals have gained minimal traction in the actual legislature.
The last states to attempt secession were the eleven Confederate states in 1860-1861, leading to the Civil War. In the modern era, there have been no successful attempts or serious governmental actions to secede, only symbolic petitions and unsuccessful legislative bills, such as the 2021 Texas independence referendum proposal.
The practical consequences would be severe and complex. The seceding state would lose all federal funding, its currency and debt would be in crisis, and its residents would lose U.S. citizenship. The federal government would almost certainly contest the action legally and, potentially, through enforcement of federal law, leading to a profound constitutional and political crisis.
A state cannot unilaterally vote to leave. While a state could theoretically hold a non-binding referendum, as proposed in Texas, such a vote would have no legal force to effect secession. Actual departure from the Union would require overcoming the precedent of Texas v. White, likely through a revolutionary change in the constitutional order or a federal constitutional amendment agreed to by other states.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!

No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/JuMe0J" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Any US state legislature votes on secession by June 30, 2026?"></iframe>