$105.09K
2
25
$105.09K
2
25
13 markets tracked
No data available
| Market | Polymarket | Kalshi | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31% | 30% | 0% |
| 13% | 12% | 1% |
| 10% | 10% | 0% |
| 10% | 9% | 1% |
| 7% | 7% | 0% |
| 6% | 7% | 0% |
| 6% | 5% | 1% |
| 6% | 3% | 4% |
| 5% | 3% | 3% |
| 5% | 2% | 3% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve to the number of senators who vote “Yea” on the first final U.S. Senate confirmation vote on the nomination of the next individual Donald Trump, as President of the United States, formally nominates to be Chair of the Federal Reserve by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Formal nominations are defined as the submission of a nomination message to the U.S. Senate. Acting or interim appointments will not count unless the individual is formally nominated to be Chair of the Fe
Prediction markets currently give about a 1 in 3 chance that 60 or more U.S. Senators will vote to confirm Donald Trump's future nominee for Federal Reserve Chair. This means traders collectively see it as more likely that the nominee falls short of the 60-vote threshold historically needed to overcome a Senate filibuster. The most probable outcome, according to the market, is a confirmation vote that succeeds with a simple majority but fails to reach that higher bipartisan total.
The forecast is shaped by recent political history and the Fed's role. The last two Fed Chairs, Jerome Powell and Janet Yellen, were confirmed with broad bipartisan support, receiving votes in the 80s. However, political polarization around economic appointments has increased. Traders are likely weighing two main factors.
First, the nominee's identity is unknown, creating uncertainty. A conventional, less controversial pick might still attract 60 votes. A nominee perceived as highly political or outside the mainstream on monetary policy could rally unified Democratic opposition.
Second, the Senate's partisan makeup matters. Republicans would need at least 10 Democrats to join them to reach 60 votes if all Republicans vote yes. In a narrowly divided Senate, securing that level of cross-party support is a significant hurdle, especially for a high-profile role that influences interest rates and the economy.
The key timeline begins after the November 2024 presidential election. If Trump wins, watch for the announcement of his intended nominee, likely in early 2025. The Senate Banking Committee will then hold confirmation hearings, which are a major signal. The tone of questioning from Democratic senators and any public statements from moderate senators from either party will indicate whether 60 votes are attainable. The final Senate floor vote, which must occur before the end of 2026, is the resolving event.
Prediction markets have a mixed but decent record on political confirmations. They often effectively aggregate the odds of known procedural hurdles and partisan dynamics. Their accuracy here depends heavily on an unknown: the future nominee. Once a name is put forward, the market odds will likely shift rapidly to incorporate new information about that person's profile and prospects. For now, the low probability assigned to a 60-vote outcome reflects a cautious bet on continued political division over a central banking role that has traditionally been somewhat insulated from partisan fights.
Prediction markets assign a low probability to a smooth confirmation for a future Trump-appointed Federal Reserve Chair. On Polymarket, the contract "Will 60 or more senators vote 'Yea'?" trades at 31¢, implying just a 31% chance. This price signals the market expects a contentious, largely partisan vote. The most probable outcome is a simple majority confirmation with fewer than 60 votes. A separate contract for "50-59 votes" trades at 58¢ on Polymarket, making it the clear favorite. The market sees a high-confirmation, low-consensus scenario.
The pricing reflects the entrenched partisan divide over the Federal Reserve and the specific conditions of a potential Trump presidency. Historically, recent Fed Chair confirmations have required significant bipartisan support; Jerome Powell was confirmed with 84 votes in 2022 and 80 votes in 2018. The market's skepticism about reaching 60 votes stems from two elements. First, a Trump nominee would likely prioritize a hawkish, deregulatory stance, alienating Democratic senators. Second, the Senate's composition is uncertain but may lack a filibuster-proof majority for the President's party, making every vote from the opposing party critical. The 50-59 vote range assumes the nominee clears the 51-vote threshold solely with Republican support, plus perhaps one or two Democrats from conservative states.
The odds hinge on the 2024 election outcome and the subsequent nominee's profile. A Republican sweep of the White House and Senate, especially with a margin of 52 or more seats, increases the chance of a party-line confirmation in the 50-59 range. However, if the nominee is a perceived moderate or a reappointment of Jerome Powell, bipartisan support could surge, making the 60+ vote contract undervalued. Conversely, a deeply controversial nominee with extreme monetary policy views could even jeopardize the simple majority, increasing the value of the "Less than 50" contract, currently priced at 11%. The nomination hearing, likely in early 2025, will be the first major test.
A minor arbitrage opportunity exists between Polymarket and Kalshi. For the key "50-59 votes" outcome, Polymarket prices it at 58¢ while Kalshi prices it at 57¢. This 1.3% spread likely stems from differing trader demographics and liquidity pools. Polymarket's global, crypto-native user base may be slightly more bullish on a partisan confirmation narrative. Kalshi's US-regulated platform might attract traders more attuned to traditional political hedging. The spread is tight enough that transaction costs erase most profit, but it indicates where slight sentiment differences lie.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
This prediction market concerns the potential confirmation vote for a Federal Reserve Chair nominee selected by Donald Trump, should he win the 2024 presidential election. The market specifically tracks how many U.S. Senators would vote 'Yea' to confirm Trump's first officially announced pick for this position, with the vote needing to occur after the nomination's issuance and before January 1, 2027. The Federal Reserve Chair is arguably the world's most powerful economic official, responsible for setting U.S. monetary policy, regulating banks, and maintaining financial stability. The outcome of this nomination would shape interest rates, inflation, and employment for years, making the Senate's confirmation process a major political and economic event. Interest in this topic stems from the high stakes of monetary policy, the intense political polarization surrounding the Fed, and the historical precedent of contentious confirmations. Analysts are watching because Trump's previous Fed Chair, Jerome Powell, was initially appointed by him but later became a frequent target of Trump's criticism, suggesting the next nomination could involve a different calculus. The Senate's composition following the 2024 elections will be the primary determinant of the vote count, with the potential for a narrow majority to either ease or complicate the nominee's path.
The confirmation process for Federal Reserve Chairs has grown more politically contentious over recent decades. Before the 1980s, confirmations were often routine. A turning point came in 1983 when President Reagan's nominee, Paul Volcker, was confirmed by an 84-16 vote despite high unemployment, showing bipartisan support for an independent central bank. The modern era of sharper partisan divides began with Alan Greenspan, who was confirmed unanimously four times, but saw more opposition in later years. Ben Bernanke's reconfirmation in 2010 saw a record 30 'Nay' votes following the financial crisis and bailouts. The most relevant precedent is Jerome Powell's initial confirmation in 2017 under President Trump. He was approved 84-13, with opposition coming largely from progressive Democrats like Elizabeth Warren who wanted a tougher regulator. However, Powell's 2021 renomination by President Biden passed by a much narrower 80-19 margin, reflecting increased political friction around the Fed. The closest recent vote for a Fed Governor was the 2020 nomination of Judy Shelton, which failed 47-50 on the Senate floor after significant Republican defections, demonstrating that controversial nominees can be blocked even by a president's own party. The historical trend is clear: Fed confirmations are no longer automatic and are increasingly subject to the partisan dynamics of a closely divided Senate.
The confirmation of a Federal Reserve Chair has profound economic consequences for Americans and the global economy. The Chair influences mortgage rates, car loans, credit card APRs, and returns on savings. Their approach to inflation and employment directly affects job availability and wage growth. A Chair perceived as overly political or incompetent could undermine confidence in the U.S. dollar and financial markets. Politically, the confirmation battle tests the Senate's ability to conduct sober oversight of critical institutions. It forces senators to balance partisan loyalty with their constitutional advice-and-consent role. A highly polarized vote could further erode public trust in the Fed's independence, a cornerstone of its effectiveness. For financial markets, uncertainty during a prolonged confirmation process can increase volatility. Investors closely watch for signals on whether monetary policy will remain predictable. The outcome signals whether the central bank will prioritize inflation control or economic growth, shaping investment decisions for years.
As of mid-2024, this is a forward-looking hypothetical scenario contingent on Donald Trump winning the November 2024 presidential election. The current Federal Reserve Chair, Jerome Powell, is serving a term that expires in May 2026. President Biden, if re-elected, would likely nominate Powell for another term or choose a different candidate before that date. The political landscape is defined by the upcoming 2024 elections, which will determine control of the White House and the Senate. Polls show a closely contested race. Speculation about potential Trump nominees exists in financial media, but no official shortlist has been announced. The Senate's composition for the 119th Congress (2025-2027) will not be known until after the November 2024 elections.
According to the U.S. Constitution, the Vice President casts the tie-breaking vote in the Senate. Therefore, a 50-50 tie would result in confirmation if the Vice President votes 'Yea.' The market would resolve based on the final tally, which would be 51 votes in favor in that scenario.
No. Federal Reserve Governors, including the Chair, are appointed to 14-year terms and can only be removed for cause, as established by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. This legal protection is designed to ensure the central bank's independence from short-term political pressure.
Most modern Chairs have been economists, lawyers, or financiers with extensive public policy experience. For example, Ben Bernanke was a former economics professor and Fed Governor, Janet Yellen was a economics professor and Vice Chair, and Jerome Powell was an investment banker and Treasury official. Academic and practical economic experience is a common thread.
No nominee for Federal Reserve Chair has ever been formally rejected by a full Senate vote. However, nominees have been withdrawn before a vote due to lack of support, and nominees for Fed Governor have been rejected, such as the 2010 withdrawal of Peter Diamond's nomination after partisan opposition.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Different
Similar
Before Jan 2027 If the number of Senators voting Yea for the nomination of Trump’s first officially announced pick for Chairman of the Federal Reserve after Issuance and before Jan 1, 2027 is X Y then the market resolves to Yes. If no vote has occurred before Jan 1, 2027, then any market not including “zero” within its count, e.g. “Between 50 and 64”, resolves to No, and any market including “zero”, e.g. “Below 50”, resolves to Yes. If the vote count is not specified but the nominee is confirme
This market will resolve to the number of senators who vote “Yea” on the first final U.S. Senate confirmation vote on the nomination of the next individual Donald Trump, as President of the United States, formally nominates to be Chair of the Federal Reserve by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Formal nominations are defined as the submission of a nomination message to the U.S. Senate. Acting or interim appointments will not count unless the individual is formally nominated to be Chair of the Fe
This market will resolve to the number of senators who vote “Yea” on the first final U.S. Senate confirmation vote on the nomination of the next individual Donald Trump, as President of the United States, formally nominates to be Chair of the Federal Reserve by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Forma
If the number of Senators voting Yea for the nomination of Trump’s first officially announced pick for Chairman of the Federal Reserve after Issuance and before Jan 1, 2027 is above 59, then the market resolves to Yes. Secondary rules: If no vote has occurred before Jan 1, 2027, then any market not
This market will resolve to the number of senators who vote “Yea” on the first final U.S. Senate confirmation vote on the nomination of the next individual Donald Trump, as President of the United States, formally nominates to be Chair of the Federal Reserve by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Forma
If the number of Senators voting Yea for the nomination of Trump’s first officially announced pick for Chairman of the Federal Reserve after Issuance and before Jan 1, 2027 is below 50, then the market resolves to Yes. Secondary rules: If no vote has occurred before Jan 1, 2027, then any market not
This market will resolve to the number of senators who vote “Yea” on the first final U.S. Senate confirmation vote on the nomination of the next individual Donald Trump, as President of the United States, formally nominates to be Chair of the Federal Reserve by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Forma
If the number of Senators voting Yea for the nomination of Trump’s first officially announced pick for Chairman of the Federal Reserve after Issuance and before Jan 1, 2027 is exactly 53, then the market resolves to Yes. Secondary rules: If no vote has occurred before Jan 1, 2027, then any market no
This market will resolve to the number of senators who vote “Yea” on the first final U.S. Senate confirmation vote on the nomination of the next individual Donald Trump, as President of the United States, formally nominates to be Chair of the Federal Reserve by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Forma
If the number of Senators voting Yea for the nomination of Trump’s first officially announced pick for Chairman of the Federal Reserve after Issuance and before Jan 1, 2027 is exactly 52, then the market resolves to Yes. Secondary rules: If no vote has occurred before Jan 1, 2027, then any market no
No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/Mrjnzm" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="How many senators will vote for Trump's Fed chair nominee?"></iframe>