
$161.64K
1
1

1 market tracked

No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Poly | 14% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Iran carries out a military strike against the U.S. military, inclusive of all U.S. military ships, planes, bases and other infrastructure, between market creation and February 28, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. Iranian missile, drone, or other strikes which are shot down or miss their targets will not be considered for this market. Strikes on U.S. military unmanned aerial vehicles/projectiles and U.S. commercial/civilian shi
Prediction markets currently give about a 1 in 7 chance that Iran will carry out a military strike against U.S. forces by February 28. This means traders collectively see such a direct attack as unlikely in the immediate term. The low probability suggests a belief that both sides are managing tensions to avoid a major, intentional escalation, even amid regional conflict.
Two main factors explain the low odds. First, recent history shows a pattern of proxy conflict rather than direct strikes. Iran has supported groups that have attacked U.S. positions in Iraq, Syria, and around the Red Sea, but it has avoided claiming responsibility for a direct, overt attack on U.S. military assets since the 2020 missile strike on Al Asad Air Base in Iraq. That event was a major escalation followed by a period of calibration.
Second, the current geopolitical calculus may discourage a direct strike. A confirmed Iranian attack would likely trigger a significant U.S. military response. Markets may be pricing in the idea that Iran’s leadership prefers to apply pressure and gain leverage through its allied networks, like the Houthis in Yemen or militias in Iraq, while maintaining a level of plausible deniability regarding attacks on U.S. troops.
The deadline itself, February 28, is the key date for this specific contract. More broadly, any sudden military action in the region could shift predictions rapidly. Watch for official U.S. statements attributing an attack directly to Iran, or statements from Iranian officials claiming responsibility for a strike. Significant developments in the Israel-Hamas war or a major attack on Iranian personnel could also increase the risk of a direct Iranian response against U.S. forces.
Prediction markets have a mixed record on geopolitical events that hinge on sudden decisions. They are often good at aggregating known information about strategic incentives and historical patterns, which is reflected in the current low probability. However, they can be poor at forecasting unexpected, impulsive actions by state actors. The primary limitation here is that a single decision in Tehran could change the odds instantly, meaning today’s forecast offers a snapshot of calculated risk, not a guarantee.
The Polymarket contract "Iran strike on US military by February 28?" is trading at 14¢, indicating a 14% probability. This price signals the market views a direct Iranian military strike on U.S. forces as unlikely within the six-day window ending February 28, 2026. With $162,000 in volume, the market has moderate liquidity, suggesting informed traders are participating. A 14% chance is low but not negligible, reflecting a clear tail risk priced into current geopolitical tensions.
Two primary factors suppress the probability. First, recent U.S.-Iran engagements have followed a contained, tit-for-tat pattern. After the January 2025 attack on U.S. forces in Jordan, American retaliatory strikes targeted IRGC assets in Syria and Iraq, not mainland Iran. Iran's subsequent responses have been symbolic, like enabling proxy attacks, avoiding direct escalation. Second, both nations have demonstrated a preference for calibrated deterrence. U.S. officials have publicly communicated red lines, while Iran seeks to avoid a full-scale conflict that would cripple its military infrastructure. The market prices in this mutual, albeit tense, understanding.
The odds could spike on two triggers. An unexpected, high-casualty attack on Iranian soil officially linked to the U.S. or Israel would force a severe response. Similarly, a major escalation by Iranian proxies, like a successful drone strike killing U.S. personnel, could trigger direct U.S. action against Iran, making a retaliatory Iranian strike on U.S. assets almost certain. The six-day window is short, but the recent assassination of an IRGC general in Syria shows how single events can rapidly shift the calculus. Monitoring U.S. diplomatic channels for changes in rhetoric toward Iran is critical; a shift from "deterrence" to "preemption" would move markets instantly.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$161.64K
1
1
This prediction market addresses the possibility of Iran conducting a direct military strike against United States military assets before February 28, 2026. The market specifically resolves to 'Yes' if Iran carries out a successful attack on U.S. military ships, planes, bases, or other infrastructure. Failed strikes, such as those intercepted by missile defenses, do not count. The question emerges from a period of heightened tension between the United States and Iran, marked by proxy conflicts, targeted assassinations, and incidents in the Persian Gulf. Since the U.S. withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal in 2018, Iran has expanded its nuclear program and increased its support for regional militias. These groups have attacked U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria, but a direct strike from Iran's conventional military remains a significant escalation threshold. Interest in this market stems from analysts monitoring whether ongoing regional conflicts, particularly involving Israel and Gaza, could trigger a wider war that draws in the U.S. and Iran directly. Military planners assess Iran's growing arsenal of drones and missiles, while diplomats watch for signals from Tehran and Washington. The market essentially quantifies the perceived risk of a major interstate conflict in the Middle East within a defined timeframe.
U.S.-Iran hostilities have deep roots, beginning with the 1979 Iranian Revolution and the subsequent hostage crisis at the U.S. embassy in Tehran. For decades, confrontation has been largely indirect, through proxies. A significant escalation occurred in January 2020, when a U.S. drone strike at Baghdad International Airport killed Qasem Soleimani, the powerful commander of Iran's Quds Force. In retaliation, on January 8, 2020, Iran launched a direct ballistic missile attack on two Iraqi military bases housing U.S. troops: Al-Asad and Erbil. Over 100 U.S. service members were diagnosed with traumatic brain injuries from the strikes, but no Americans were killed. This event established a precedent for Iran directly targeting U.S. military infrastructure. Another key precedent is Iran's seizure and harassment of commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, which has repeatedly drawn U.S. naval responses. Since 2019, Iran has also been accused of attacking oil tankers with mines and drones. The U.S. maintains approximately 30,000 troops in the Middle East, with significant concentrations in Iraq, Syria, and naval forces in the Persian Gulf and Arabian Sea, creating persistent points of friction.
A direct Iranian strike on U.S. military assets would likely trigger a substantial American retaliatory response, potentially sparking a regional war. Such a conflict could immediately disrupt global oil supplies, as approximately 20% of the world's oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran could attempt to block. Oil price spikes would have global economic consequences, increasing inflation and slowing growth. Politically, it would force the U.S. to divert significant military and diplomatic resources to the Middle East, impacting its strategic focus on other regions like Europe and the Indo-Pacific. Domestically, it could reignite debates about American military involvement overseas and influence U.S. presidential politics. For the Middle East, a direct U.S.-Iran war would destabilize the entire region, drawing in allies like Israel and Saudi Arabia and exacerbating existing conflicts in Yemen, Syria, and Lebanon. The human cost would be high for military personnel and civilians in conflict zones.
As of early 2024, tensions remain high. The war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza has increased the risk of regional spillover. Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen continue to attack commercial shipping in the Red Sea, prompting U.S. and UK airstrikes against Houthi targets. The U.S. has conducted further retaliatory strikes against Iran-backed militias in Iraq and Syria following a drone attack that killed three American soldiers in Jordan in January 2024. Iran has continued to advance its nuclear program, with the International Atomic Energy Agency reporting that its stockpile of enriched uranium is many times above the limits of the 2015 nuclear deal. Diplomatic efforts to de-escalate have seen limited progress.
Yes. The most significant direct attack occurred on January 8, 2020, when Iran launched ballistic missiles at the Al-Asad and Erbil airbases in Iraq, which housed U.S. troops. This was retaliation for the U.S. killing of IRGC General Qasem Soleimani. Over 100 U.S. service members were injured.
An Iranian attack would be conducted by Iran's official military, like the IRGC, using Iranian missiles, drones, or naval forces. An attack by a militia, such as Kataib Hezbollah in Iraq, is conducted by a separate, armed group that receives Iranian funding, training, and weapons. The prediction market only resolves 'Yes' for a direct Iranian military strike.
Key bases include Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar, Al-Dhafra Air Base in UAE, Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait, and sites in Iraq and Syria. The U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet is headquartered in Bahrain. Numerous U.S. ships also operate in the Persian Gulf, Arabian Sea, and Red Sea.
Iran's most likely tools are its large inventory of ballistic missiles (like the Sejjil and Emad models) and cruise missiles (such as the Soumar). It also possesses thousands of drones, including the Shahed-136 loitering munition, which have been used by its proxies and could be launched from Iranian territory.
The U.S. response would almost certainly involve military retaliation. Past responses to Iranian provocations have included airstrikes on IRGC facilities and associated militia targets. The scale would depend on the severity of the Iranian attack, but it would aim to deter further aggression and could target Iranian missile sites, naval assets, or command centers.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.

No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/OE8CCs" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Iran strike on US military by February 28?"></iframe>