
$173.59K
1
1

1 market tracked

No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Poly | 22% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve to “Yes” if all of the following conditions are met by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET: - Russia x Ukraine ceasefire - Ukraine agrees not to join NATO - Ukraine signs peace deal with Russia Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. This market will remain open until it is confirmed that at least one of the above conditions has not been met, or until all of the above conditions have been met within the specified timeframe. The full rules for this market can be found
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$173.59K
1
1
The Russia-Ukraine Peace Parlay prediction market assesses the probability of a specific, comprehensive peace settlement between Russia and Ukraine being achieved by December 31, 2026. This market resolves to 'Yes' only if three distinct conditions are simultaneously met: a formal ceasefire is declared and holds, Ukraine formally agrees not to pursue membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and Ukraine signs a comprehensive peace deal with Russia. The market will resolve to 'No' if any one of these conditions fails to materialize within the timeframe. This topic sits at the intersection of geopolitics, military conflict, and international diplomacy, representing one of the most significant and closely watched security crises of the 21st century. The war, which escalated dramatically with Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022, has resulted in massive casualties, widespread destruction, and profound global economic and political disruption. Interest in this prediction market stems from its attempt to quantify the likelihood of a definitive end to the conflict based on specific, high-stakes political concessions. The conditions reflect core Russian war aims, particularly the neutralization of Ukraine, and core Ukrainian principles of sovereignty and self-determination, making their simultaneous fulfillment a major geopolitical pivot point. Analysts, investors, and policymakers monitor such markets for aggregated sentiment on potential conflict outcomes.
The roots of the current conflict trace back to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 and Ukraine's subsequent independence. Tensions escalated in 2014 following Ukraine's Euromaidan revolution, which ousted pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych. Russia responded by annexing Crimea and fomenting a separatist war in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine, conflicts that simmered for eight years under the largely ineffective Minsk agreements. These agreements, brokered by France and Germany in 2014 and 2015, aimed to reintegrate the separatist-held areas but were interpreted differently by Kyiv and Moscow, failing to bring lasting peace. The current full-scale war began on February 24, 2022, when Russian forces launched a multi-front invasion from the north, east, and south. Initial Russian objectives included capturing Kyiv and decapitating the Ukrainian government, but these failed due to fierce Ukrainian resistance. The conflict has since evolved into a protracted war of attrition along a largely static, heavily fortified front line stretching hundreds of miles. Historical precedents for peace talks are limited; early negotiations in Belarus and Turkey in spring 2022 collapsed, and since late 2022, both sides have shown little public appetite for major concessions, viewing the conflict as existential.
The outcome of this peace parlay carries immense global significance. A resolution meeting all three conditions would represent a dramatic restructuring of European security, effectively recognizing a Russian sphere of influence and potentially emboldening further aggression. It would have profound implications for the international rules-based order, signaling that territorial conquest through force can succeed. Economically, a stable peace could gradually normalize global energy and agricultural markets, which have been severely disrupted by the war, but might also lead to the lifting of sanctions on Russia, with complex global financial repercussions. Domestically, for Ukraine, such a peace would require a painful national consensus to accept territorial losses and security limitations, with deep social and political consequences. For Russia, it could allow a refocusing of economic resources and military capacity elsewhere. The broader impact extends to global alliances, potentially testing NATO unity and influencing security calculations in East Asia and beyond. Millions of displaced Ukrainians and the future stability of the European continent hinge on the terms of any eventual settlement.
As of mid-2024, the war remains an active, grinding conflict with no high-level peace talks underway. The frontline has been largely static following failed Ukrainian counteroffensives in 2023 and continued Russian assaults, particularly around towns like Avdiivka and Chasiv Yar. Both nations have transitioned to a war footing, with Ukraine enacting a new mobilization law and Russia allocating nearly a third of its state budget to defense. Diplomatic activity is fragmented, with various international actors like China and Turkey promoting peace frameworks, but Zelenskyy and Putin remain publicly far apart on core issues. Ukraine insists on the full restoration of its 1991 borders as a precondition for serious talks, while Russia demands recognition of its claimed annexations. The condition for Ukraine to agree not to join NATO appears particularly distant, as Ukrainian public support for NATO membership remains high and was codified in a 2019 constitutional amendment.
The primary obstacles are irreconcilable positions on territory and security. Ukraine demands the complete withdrawal of Russian forces to its internationally recognized 1991 borders, including Crimea. Russia demands Ukrainian recognition of its sovereignty over Crimea and the occupied eastern territories. Additionally, Russia insists on Ukrainian neutrality and demilitarization, terms Ukraine rejects as threats to its sovereignty.
Yes, prior to 2014, Ukrainian policy on NATO membership was ambiguous and subject to political shifts. Following Russia's annexation of Crimea and the war in Donbas, public and political support for NATO membership surged. In 2019, Ukraine formally enshrined the strategic goal of NATO and EU membership in its constitution, making a formal renunciation a significant legal and political hurdle.
Several rounds of talks were held in Belarus and Turkey in the first two months of the 2022 invasion. These discussions reportedly included drafts addressing Ukrainian neutrality and security guarantees, but they collapsed over disagreements on the status of Crimea and Donbas, and following revelations of Russian atrocities in Bucha. No direct, high-level bilateral talks have occurred since late 2022.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!

No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/QkNoQb" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Russia x Ukraine Peace Parlay"></iframe>