
$33.30K
1
1

1 market tracked

No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Poly | 39% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve to “Yes” if both Denmark and the United States sign a deal, treaty, or similar international agreement of any kind relating to Greenland by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. Any U.S.–Danish agreement relating to Greenland will qualify, regardless of subject matter, including but not limited to sovereignty, governance, security arrangements, or access to natural resources. Examples of qualifying deals include but are not limite
Traders on prediction markets currently give a roughly 2 in 5 chance that the U.S. and Denmark will sign any new agreement about Greenland before the end of 2026. With odds at 39%, the collective view is that a deal is possible but not likely. This reflects a significant amount of skepticism that such a complex diplomatic goal can be achieved within the given timeframe.
The low probability stems from a mix of political history and current realities. First, the idea gained notoriety in 2019 when then-President Donald Trump publicly confirmed he had discussed purchasing Greenland, an autonomous Danish territory. Denmark’s government flatly rejected the idea, calling it "absurd." This created a diplomatic rift and established Greenland as a sensitive topic between the allies.
Second, while the market question is broad enough to cover any agreement, not just a sale, the underlying tensions remain. Greenland’s government and population are deeply protective of their autonomy and resources. Any new pact perceived to infringe on that would face strong local opposition. Finally, the outcome depends heavily on the results of the 2024 U.S. election and the political will of the next administration to prioritize this specific issue, adding another layer of uncertainty.
The main event that will shape these odds is the U.S. presidential election in November 2024. A second Trump administration might revive the concept, while a different outcome could see it shelved indefinitely. Beyond that, watch for any official statements from the Danish Foreign Ministry or the Government of Greenland. Formal negotiations would need to be announced, and any such news would likely cause the prediction market probability to shift.
Prediction markets are generally useful for aggregating informed views on political outcomes, but this is a particularly niche question. There is little historical precedent for forecasting the success of specific, unusual diplomatic proposals like this one. The low trading volume also suggests this is a speculative market driven by a smaller group of traders. While the odds are a real-time snapshot of collective belief, they should be seen as a gauge of sentiment rather than a firm forecast, given the unique and long-term nature of the event.
Prediction markets assign a 39% probability that the US and Denmark will sign any agreement relating to Greenland by December 31, 2026. This price indicates the market views a deal as unlikely, but not impossible. With only $33,000 in total volume, liquidity is thin, meaning this price is more susceptible to sentiment shifts than a heavily traded market.
The low probability directly reflects the political history of this issue. In 2019, a confirmed report that then-President Donald Trump had discussed purchasing Greenland with advisors was met with immediate and unequivocal rejection from the Danish government, which called the idea "absurd." This established a firm precedent of Danish resistance to any transaction involving Greenlandic sovereignty. The market price accounts for this entrenched diplomatic stance. Furthermore, the question's broad scope, which includes any agreement on security or resources, is likely keeping the probability from falling into single digits. Ongoing US strategic interest in the Arctic, partly driven by Russian and Chinese activity, creates a persistent, low-level incentive for some form of new bilateral arrangement.
A decisive shift in Danish political leadership toward a more US-aligned, transaction-friendly posture would be required to significantly boost these odds, a scenario not currently anticipated. The 2024 US election is the primary near-term catalyst. A second Trump administration could re-energize efforts toward a deal, potentially increasing market probability through 2025. However, any renewed push would almost certainly reaffirm Danish and Greenlandic opposition, likely capping major price gains. Conversely, a US election result that de-prioritizes this geopolitical objective could push probabilities lower. The market will remain highly sensitive to official statements from Copenhagen or Nuuk rejecting any transfer of authority, which would immediately suppress prices.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$33.30K
1
1
This prediction market topic concerns whether the United States and Denmark will sign any formal agreement related to Greenland by December 31, 2026. The question stems from former President Donald Trump's publicly expressed interest in purchasing Greenland from Denmark in 2019, an idea that was immediately and firmly rejected by the Danish government. While an outright sale is politically unfeasible, the market's broad criteria include any bilateral agreement, such as those covering security cooperation, resource development, or governance arrangements. The topic gained renewed attention following Trump's election victory in November 2024, which raised questions about whether his administration would pursue alternative forms of engagement with Greenland. Interest in this market reflects speculation about U.S. strategic ambitions in the Arctic, Denmark's sovereignty over Greenland, and the potential for diplomatic agreements that could reshape regional dynamics. The resolution depends on a formal signing event before the deadline, making it a measure of political will and diplomatic progress between the two nations.
The United States' strategic interest in Greenland is not new. In 1946, President Harry S. Truman offered Denmark $100 million in gold for the island, a proposal Denmark refused. Instead, a defense agreement was signed in 1951, granting the U.S. rights to operate Thule Air Base in northwestern Greenland. Thule remains the U.S. Air Force's northernmost base and is a key site for missile warning and space surveillance. Greenland gained home rule from Denmark in 1979 and further self-government in 2009, which gave it control over most domestic affairs, though foreign and defense policy remains with Copenhagen. The 2019 episode with Trump was the most recent and public expression of U.S. acquisition interest, but it followed a long history of American geopolitical and scientific activity on the island, driven by its location between North America and Europe and its vast, untapped mineral resources.
A formal U.S.-Danish agreement on Greenland would have significant geopolitical consequences. It would directly affect the balance of power in the Arctic, a region where Russia and China are also expanding their economic and military activities. For the United States, enhanced access or influence in Greenland could provide strategic advantages for surveillance, resource security, and projecting power. For Greenland, a deal could bring substantial investment for infrastructure and resource extraction, potentially accelerating its path toward greater economic independence from Denmark. However, it could also provoke domestic political tensions between those seeking development and those prioritizing environmental protection and cultural preservation. For Denmark, any agreement that alters the status of Greenland touches on core issues of national sovereignty and its role as a steward of a territory moving gradually toward possible full independence.
As of late 2024, following the U.S. presidential election, the political landscape has shifted. The Danish government has not indicated any change in its position that Greenland is not for sale. However, officials in both Washington and Copenhagen have acknowledged ongoing dialogue about Arctic security and cooperation. No formal negotiations for a new, comprehensive bilateral agreement relating to Greenland have been announced. The topic remains speculative, dependent on the policy priorities of the incoming U.S. administration and the willingness of the Danish and Greenlandic governments to engage on specific proposals.
Trump cited strategic and economic reasons, including Greenland's geographic position in the Arctic, its potential mineral wealth, and a desire to counter Chinese and Russian influence in the region. He viewed it as a sizable territorial acquisition.
There is no legal barrier if Denmark, which holds sovereignty, agreed to sell it. However, such a transaction is considered politically impossible because Denmark has consistently stated Greenland is not for sale, and the people of Greenland would have to consent.
It is a treaty between the U.S. and Denmark that allows the United States to operate Thule Air Base in Greenland. It forms the foundation of the current U.S. military presence on the island and would be a precedent for any new security arrangements.
Independence is a long-term goal for many Greenlandic political parties, but it is contingent on achieving economic self-sufficiency. Currently, Greenland relies on a large annual subsidy from Denmark, which complicates the path to full sovereignty.
Greenland's Kvanefjeld and other sites contain some of the world's largest undeveloped deposits of rare earth elements, which are critical for electronics, renewable energy technologies, and military equipment. This resource potential is a major driver of international interest.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.

No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/WOZqi2" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Trump x Greenland deal signed by December 31?"></iframe>