
$152.85K
1
11

$152.85K
1
11
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve according to the company that owns the model with the third-highest arena score based on the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard when the table under the "Leaderboard" tab is checked on February 28, 2026, 12:00 PM ET. Results from the "Arena Score" section on the Leaderboard tab of https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text set to default (style control on) will be used to resolve this market. Models will be ranked primarily by their arena score at this market’s check time, with al
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
This prediction market focuses on identifying which company will own the third-ranked artificial intelligence model according to a specific public benchmark in late February 2026. The market resolves based on the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard, a crowdsourced evaluation platform run by the Large Model Systems Organization (LMSYS Org). The ranking uses an 'Arena Score' derived from anonymous, randomized user votes where models compete head-to-head in conversations. The 'style control on' setting filters these votes to prioritize responses that are helpful, harmless, and follow specific conversational guidelines, aiming to reduce variability from subjective user preferences. The market specifically tracks the third position, a highly contested spot that often indicates a model with strong general capabilities but not the absolute top-tier performance of the leading one or two. Interest in this market stems from the intense competition and rapid innovation in the generative AI field. Companies invest billions in developing these models, and their public ranking on benchmarks like the Chatbot Arena directly influences developer adoption, investor perception, and strategic partnerships. Tracking the #3 position provides insight into which organizations are successfully keeping pace with industry leaders like OpenAI and Anthropic, and which might be falling behind. The February 2026 checkpoint offers a snapshot of a dynamic landscape, capturing the results of nearly two more years of research and development cycles.
The Chatbot Arena leaderboard launched in May 2023 as a response to the limitations of static, automated benchmarks for evaluating large language models. Traditional benchmarks like MMLU or GSM8K could be overfit by developers, whereas the Arena's human evaluation aimed to measure real-world conversational quality. In its first year, the leaderboard was dominated by OpenAI's GPT-4 and Anthropic's Claude 3 Opus, establishing a durable top tier. The position of #3, however, proved highly volatile. Throughout 2024, it was occupied at different times by Google's Gemini Ultra, Anthropic's Claude 3 Sonnet, and open-source models like Qwen. A significant precedent was set in early 2024 when a fine-tuned version of Meta's Llama model, not released by Meta itself, briefly entered the top three, demonstrating that the ranking could be influenced by community efforts. The introduction of the 'style control' filter in 2024 was another key development. This filter was added to address criticism that votes could be swayed by a model's verbosity or personality rather than objective helpfulness. By filtering for votes where users indicated a preference for a controlled response style, LMSYS aimed to create a more consistent evaluation metric, which became the standard for this prediction market.
The ranking of AI models has substantial economic implications. The company that owns a top-three model gains significant leverage in attracting enterprise customers, securing cloud partnership deals, and hiring top AI research talent. Venture capital and public market investment often flow toward perceived leaders, making a high rank on a respected public leaderboard a valuable asset for fundraising and valuation. For developers and businesses building applications, the choice of which model API to use is heavily influenced by these performance rankings, directly affecting a company's revenue and ecosystem growth. Beyond economics, the competition for ranking influences the direction of AI research and development. The pressure to score well on human evaluation benchmarks like the Arena may incentivize companies to prioritize immediate conversational fluency over other important factors like long-term reasoning, cost efficiency, or transparency. The focus on the #3 spot specifically highlights the fierce competition just below the very top, where business contracts and market share are actively contested. The outcome signals which architectural approaches or corporate strategies are yielding competitive results in a field where technical advantages can be fleeting.
As of late 2024, the Chatbot Arena leaderboard with style control on shows OpenAI's o1 model family at the top, followed by Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet. The third position is highly dynamic, frequently contested between models like Google's Gemini 1.5 Pro, DeepSeek's latest offerings, and fine-tuned versions of Meta's Llama 3.1. The landscape is in a state of flux following several major model releases in the latter half of 2024, and the ranking can shift weekly as new votes are collected. The focus of leading labs appears to be on improving reasoning capabilities and cost-performance ratios, factors that influence but are not perfectly captured by the Arena's conversational evaluation.
The Arena uses a system similar to chess rankings. Each model starts with a base Elo rating. When two models are compared by a user, the winner gains Elo points and the loser loses points. The amount transferred depends on the difference in their ratings; an upset by a lower-rated model causes a larger point swing.
'Style control on' filters the voting data to only include battles where the voter indicated a preference for a helpful, harmless, and direct response style. 'Style control off' uses all votes, including those where users may have preferred a more verbose, creative, or entertaining response from the AI.
Direct manipulation is difficult due to anonymous, randomized voting. However, companies can influence their score by strategically releasing models when interest is high to gather votes quickly, or by optimizing their models specifically for the types of conversational queries prevalent on the Arena platform.
The leaderboard updates continuously as new votes are processed. The public table typically refreshes multiple times per day, but the Elo ratings for each model only become stable after they have accumulated a significant number of votes, which can take days or weeks for a new release.
Prediction markets aggregate the beliefs of many participants about a future event. For a fast-moving, technical field like AI, this can synthesize diverse information—including rumors of upcoming releases, analysis of research papers, and inference from corporate behavior—into a probabilistic forecast that may be more accurate than any single expert's opinion.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
11 markets tracked

No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Poly | 79% |
![]() | Poly | 15% |
![]() | Poly | 3% |
![]() | Poly | 2% |
![]() | Poly | 2% |
![]() | Poly | 1% |
![]() | Poly | 0% |
![]() | Poly | 0% |
![]() | Poly | 0% |
![]() | Poly | 0% |
![]() | Poly | 0% |





No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/X_3ZhN" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Which company has the #3 AI model end of February? (Style Control On)"></iframe>