Skip to main content
Events
GroupKALSHI

Will any U.S. state experience a population decrease of at least 10% between 2025 and 2035?

Will any U.S. state experience a population decrease of at least 10% between 2025 and 2035?
Vol

$0.00

|
Events

1

|
Markets

1

AI Analysis

Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge

21%
Top Probability
$0.00
Volume
1
Markets
1
Platforms

About This Event

Between 2025 and 2035? If any U.S. state experiences a population decrease of at least 10% between 2025 and 2035, then the market resolves to Yes. Early close condition: This market will close and expire early if the event occurs. This market will close and expire early if the event occurs.

Current Market Outlook

Kalshi traders put a 21% probability on any U.S. state losing at least 10% of its population between 2025 and 2035. That's roughly a one-in-five chance, which the market treats as unlikely but not absurd. For context, a 10% decline over a decade is a massive demographic shock. No state came close to that in the 2010s; West Virginia, the worst performer, lost about 3.5% from 2010 to 2020. The last time a state shed a tenth of its people in a single decade was during the 1950s farm-to-city exodus, when states like Arkansas and Mississippi bled residents.

Key Factors Driving the Odds

The 21% price reflects two competing realities. First, the Census Bureau's 2023 population projections show several states on track for meaningful declines, but none approaching 10%. West Virginia, Illinois, and Mississippi are projected to lose between 1% and 5% by 2035. Second, the market is pricing in tail risk from accelerated out-migration. The pandemic-era remote work shift hollowed out expensive coastal metros, but that mostly redistributed people to Sun Belt states rather than shrinking entire states.

The bigger wildcard is demographic momentum. The U.S. birth rate has fallen below replacement, and deaths are projected to outnumber births in roughly half of all states by 2030. If that mortality crossover combines with continued out-migration in states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, or Louisiana, the decline curve steepens. Still, hitting 10% requires a perfect storm: a regional recession, a climate-driven displacement event, or a policy shock like a major tax exodus.

What Could Change These Odds

The 2030 Census is the first hard checkpoint. If early state-level estimates from the American Community Survey show any state tracking at a 6% or 7% decline by 2028, the market should reprice sharply upward. Watch specific states: Louisiana, which lost 3% in the 2010s and faces hurricane-driven insurance costs, and West Virginia, whose coal economy keeps contracting. A federal policy change, like eliminating the state and local tax deduction, could also accelerate out-migration from high-tax states.

The early close condition matters here. If any state crosses the 10% threshold before 2035, the market resolves immediately. That means the 21% price isn't just about the decade-long trend, it's also a bet on whether the decline happens early enough to be observed. A sudden shock, like a catastrophic hurricane season or a major industrial collapse, could trigger resolution years ahead of schedule.

Cross-Platform Analysis

This market trades only on Kalshi, so there's no direct cross-platform comparison. Polymarket has no equivalent contract, which means the 21% price reflects a single venue's liquidity and trader base. Kalshi's demographic-heavy trader pool tends to be slightly more pessimistic on social trends than the broader market, so the true probability might sit a few points lower if Polymarket had a competing contract.

AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.

Overview

This prediction market asks whether any U.S. state will experience a population decrease of at least 10% between 2025 and 2035. The question is not about a specific state, but about the possibility of any state crossing that threshold. A 10% decline over a decade is a dramatic demographic shift, far exceeding the typical annual changes most states see. For context, the U.S. population grew by about 7.4% between 2010 and 2020, and no state lost more than 3.2% of its population during that period (West Virginia). A 10% decline would represent an accelerated and sustained exodus, driven by factors such as economic stagnation, climate change, or shifts in employment opportunities. Population trends in the U.S. have become increasingly polarized. States in the Northeast and Midwest, such as New York, Illinois, and West Virginia, have experienced slow growth or outright decline in recent decades, while the South and West have absorbed most of the nation's growth. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated some of these patterns, with remote work enabling migration to lower-cost and warmer regions. However, the pandemic also introduced volatility, with some states like Idaho and Montana seeing surges, while others like California and New York saw net outflows. The 2020 Census and subsequent estimates from the Census Bureau show that many states are growing, but a few are losing residents. For example, between 2020 and 2023, California lost over 500,000 residents, and New York lost over 600,000, though these losses are still small relative to their total populations (about 1.5% and 3% respectively). To reach a 10% decline, a state would need to lose roughly 1 in 10 residents in a decade, a pace that has not been seen in modern U.S. history, except in extreme cases like the Dust Bowl or post-Katrina Louisiana. The interest in this market stems from the broader conversation about demographic change, economic competition, and climate adaptation. Investors and policymakers are watching migration patterns to anticipate changes in tax bases, political representation, and housing markets. A 10% decline would trigger significant realignment in federal funding, congressional seats, and state budgets. The market also reflects a bet on whether current trends will accelerate or reverse, making it a barometer for public sentiment about the future of American geography. Currently, the market is trading at low odds, suggesting that most participants believe a 10% decline is unlikely. However, the question remains open, and the next decade will reveal whether any state can sustain such a rapid loss. Factors like the aging population, birth rates, and international migration will play a role, as will unexpected shocks such as natural disasters or economic crises.

Historical Context

The United States has experienced significant population shifts throughout its history, but a 10% decline in a single state over a decade is rare. In the 20th century, the Dust Bowl of the 1930s led to large out-migration from Oklahoma and neighboring states, but even then, the losses were not sustained over a full decade. More recently, Louisiana lost about 5% of its population after Hurricane Katrina in 2005, but that was a one-time event, and the state has since partially recovered. The closest example to a 10% decline might be the population losses in the Great Plains in the 1980s, but those were spread over several states. In the 2010s, the U.S. as a whole grew at its slowest rate since the Great Depression, and many states in the Northeast and Midwest saw stagnant or declining populations. West Virginia was the only state to lose population in every year of the decade, with a cumulative loss of 3.2%. Illinois lost about 1.4% of its population, and Connecticut lost about 1.1%. These declines were driven by factors such as deindustrialization, lack of economic opportunities, and an aging population. However, none came close to a 10% loss. The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 brought a shift in migration patterns, with many people leaving large cities and high-cost states for suburban and rural areas. Between 2020 and 2023, California, New York, and Illinois experienced significant net out-migration, while states like Texas, Florida, and Idaho saw inflows. Yet even the hardest-hit states lost less than 4% of their population in that three-year period. The pandemic also affected birth rates and immigration, which are key components of population change. The 2020 Census showed a population that was more diverse and older, and these trends are expected to continue. Looking forward, demographic projections from the Census Bureau and other institutions suggest that the U.S. population will grow slowly, but the distribution will shift. The South and West are expected to gain population, while the Northeast and Midwest may see further losses. However, a 10% decline in any state would require an unprecedented combination of factors, including sustained out-migration, low birth rates, and possibly a catastrophic event. Historical precedent suggests that such a decline is unlikely, but not impossible, especially if a state faces a long-term economic collapse or climate-induced disasters.

Why It Matters

A 10% population decline in any state would have profound economic and political consequences. Population determines representation in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College, so a significant loss would mean a loss of political power. States with declining populations also receive less federal funding for programs like Medicaid, highway construction, and education, as many formulas are based on population. This could create a downward spiral, as reduced funding leads to poorer services, which in turn encourages more out-migration. Socially, a 10% decline would strain local communities, leading to school closures, hospital consolidations, and reduced access to services. It would also affect the housing market, with an oversupply of homes and declining property values. The demographic profile would skew older, as younger people are more likely to move, which would increase the dependency ratio and put pressure on state budgets. The psychological impact on residents could also be significant, as they see their communities shrink and their opportunities diminish. Beyond the immediate effects, a 10% decline would signal a broader failure of regional economies and could trigger policy responses at the federal level. It might lead to proposals for economic revitalization, immigration reform, or even changes in federal funding formulas. It would also be a bellwether for other states facing similar pressures, potentially accelerating migration trends. For investors, a state with a 10% population decline would see a drop in demand for housing, commercial real estate, and consumer goods, presenting both risks and opportunities.

Was this helpful?
Updated Aug 4, 2026

Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.

Market Insights

Average Yes Price
21¢
Kalshi
Arbitrage Opps
0
Cross-Platform
0

Trade This Market