
$65.83K
1
1

1 market tracked

No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Poly | 23% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve to "Yes" if any US bank fails between this market's creation and the listed date 11:59 PM ET (according to the FDIC's "Failed Bank List"). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No." For this market to resolve to "Yes", the bank's closing date as listed by the FDIC must be within this market's above-specified timeframe. If there is a potential bank failure within this market's timeframe and the FDIC "Failed Bank List" has not been updated yet, this market may remain op
Prediction markets currently give about a 1 in 4 chance that a US bank will fail by March 31. This means traders collectively see it as unlikely, but not impossible. The 23% probability suggests a real, though minority, belief that another bank could collapse in the next month.
The relatively low odds reflect a few factors. First, the intense banking stress of March 2023, which saw Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic fail, has largely subsided. Regulators and banks have since taken steps to shore up liquidity and manage interest rate risk. Second, while some regional banks still hold significant unrealized losses on their bond portfolios due to higher interest rates, widespread panic has not returned. The market is essentially betting that these existing problems are now being managed without new failures, at least in the very short term.
There are no specific failure deadlines, but market sentiment can shift quickly. Traders watch quarterly financial reports from banks for signs of deepening trouble. They also monitor the Federal Reserve's statements on interest rates, as further rate hikes could pressure bank balance sheets. Any unexpected news about a specific bank facing a liquidity crunch or a surge in deposit withdrawals could cause the prediction probability to jump.
Prediction markets have a mixed record on rare, specific events like a bank failure within a narrow window. They are good at aggregating available public information about financial stress, but they cannot reliably predict sudden, unforeseen collapses. The 23% chance is less a precise forecast and more a snapshot of current worry levels. It tells us that while the system appears stable for now, a non-trivial group of people with money on the line still see a meaningful risk of another shock.
The Polymarket contract "Another US bank failure by March 31?" is trading at 23¢, indicating a 23% implied probability. This price signals the market views a new FDIC-insured bank failure within the next 30 days as unlikely, but not a remote possibility. With only $66,000 in total volume, liquidity is thin, meaning this price could be sensitive to new information or trading by a small number of participants.
The 23% probability reflects a cautious stability in the banking sector. Direct pressure from the 2023 regional banking crisis, which saw Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic fail, has largely subsided. Banks have bolstered liquidity and are paying closer attention to interest rate risk. The Federal Reserve's 2024 stress tests showed the largest banks could withstand a severe recession, contributing to broader confidence. However, the probability isn't zero because persistent challenges remain. Commercial real estate loan portfolios, particularly for smaller regional banks, are a known vulnerability as office vacancies stay high and refinancing costs rise. The market price accounts for this lingering risk.
This market will be decided by specific regulatory action, making FDIC announcements the sole catalyst. The odds could rise quickly if a prominent regional bank reports unexpected losses or a liquidity crunch, especially one with concentrated exposure to troubled property sectors. Quarterly financial reports from banks in early March could provide such a trigger. Conversely, the probability could fall toward 10% or lower if the next few weeks pass without negative headlines and economic data suggests a softer landing, reducing fears of a credit cycle downturn. The short 30-day timeframe makes the market a direct bet on an immediate, acute crisis rather than a slow deterioration.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$65.83K
1
1
This prediction market asks whether any US bank will fail between the market's creation date and March 31, based on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's official 'Failed Bank List.' A bank failure occurs when a financial institution cannot meet its obligations to depositors and creditors, typically leading to its closure by a state or federal banking regulator and subsequent takeover by the FDIC. The FDIC's list is the definitive public record of such events, documenting the institution's name, location, and the specific date it was closed. The market resolves to 'Yes' only if the FDIC lists a bank closure date within the specified timeframe, making the regulator's public disclosures the sole arbiter of the outcome. Interest in this market stems from ongoing concerns about the stability of the US banking system following several high-profile failures in 2023. The collapses of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic Bank revealed vulnerabilities related to interest rate risk, uninsured deposit concentrations, and rapid growth strategies. While regulators implemented emergency measures and industry stress appears to have moderated, questions persist about the health of smaller and regional banks, particularly those with commercial real estate exposure or similar asset-liability mismatches. Market participants monitor FDIC quarterly banking profiles, Federal Reserve stress test results, and earnings reports from individual institutions for signals of distress. The question of another failure by March 31 focuses attention on whether the systemic pressures have been contained or if further instability lies ahead.
The modern era of US bank failures is often traced to the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s and early 1990s, when 1,043 thrifts failed between 1986 and 1995. The crisis led to the creation of the Resolution Trust Corporation and cost an estimated $160 billion. The period following the 2008 global financial crisis saw another wave of failures, with 489 banks collapsing between 2008 and 2012, including Washington Mutual, the largest failure in US history with $307 billion in assets. These events prompted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, which established stricter capital and stress testing requirements for larger institutions. The decade from 2013 to 2022 was relatively quiet, with only 27 bank failures total, largely small community banks. This calm was shattered in March 2023 with the sudden collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, the second-largest bank failure in US history with $209 billion in assets. Its failure was followed within days by the closure of Signature Bank ($110 billion in assets) and in May by First Republic Bank ($229 billion in assets). These three failures in 2023 accounted for over 90% of the total assets lost in all US bank failures since 2008, marking a return to systemic banking stress not seen since the financial crisis.
Bank failures directly impact depositors, employees, and local communities. While insured deposits are protected by the FDIC up to $250,000, business accounts and wealthy individuals often hold sums far exceeding that limit. A failure can freeze operating capital for companies and wipe out personal savings. The broader economic impact includes a potential contraction in lending, as surviving banks may tighten credit standards, affecting small businesses and homebuyers. A cluster of failures can trigger a loss of confidence in the financial system, leading to deposit flight from perceived weaker institutions and increasing the cost of borrowing for all banks. Politically, bank failures become a focal point for debates over regulatory effectiveness. The 2023 failures led to congressional hearings and proposals to reform deposit insurance, increase capital requirements, and enhance supervisory scrutiny. Regulators face pressure to prevent collapses without creating moral hazard, where banks take excessive risks believing they will be rescued. For the average person, bank failures can affect mortgage rates, the availability of business loans, and the stability of the stock market, where financial sector volatility often spreads to other industries.
As of late 2023 and early 2024, the US banking sector shows mixed signals. The FDIC's Third Quarter 2023 Quarterly Banking Profile reported that the industry remained profitable and well-capitalized overall, but noted persistent pressures from unrealized losses, rising funding costs, and credit quality concerns, particularly in commercial real estate lending. No banks failed in the fourth quarter of 2023. However, Moody's maintained a negative outlook on the US banking system in December 2023, citing high interest rates and potential economic softening. Several regional banks, including New York Community Bank, experienced significant stock volatility in early 2024 due to concerns about their commercial real estate exposure and earnings, though none have failed. Regulators continue to emphasize vigilance, with the FDIC and Federal Reserve expected to propose new long-term debt and resolution planning requirements for larger regional banks in 2024.
The FDIC insures deposits up to $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank, for each account ownership category. If your bank fails, the FDIC typically arranges for another bank to assume the insured deposits by the next business day, or it issues checks for the insured amounts. Uninsured deposits (amounts over $250,000) may be recovered later from the sale of the failed bank's assets, but this process can take time and may not return 100 cents on the dollar.
The FDIC updates its Failed Bank List in real-time when a bank is closed. The listing includes the bank's name, city, state, FDIC certificate number, and the exact closing date. The list is the official public record and is considered the authoritative source for determining if a failure has occurred for purposes like this prediction market.
The failures of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic Bank shared several causes. A primary factor was a significant mismatch between assets and liabilities, where banks held long-term bonds that lost market value as interest rates rose rapidly. Simultaneously, they relied heavily on uninsured deposits from concentrated customer bases (tech startups, crypto firms, wealthy individuals) that withdrew funds quickly at the first sign of trouble, creating a liquidity crisis.
Analysts and rating agencies often point to banks with high exposure to commercial real estate loans, especially office properties facing high vacancy rates, as an area of concern. Smaller and regional banks with large securities portfolios carrying unrealized losses and those that experienced rapid growth in uninsured deposits are also scrutinized. However, regulators do not publicly identify specific institutions believed to be at risk outside of their confidential problem bank list.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.

No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/_pgoed" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Another US bank failure by March 31?"></iframe>