The Italy Nordio Reform Referendum refers to a proposed constitutional referendum expected in March 2026 concerning significant amendments to the Italian Constitution related to the judiciary. Named after Italy's Minister of Justice, Carlo Nordio, the reform package seeks to alter the organization and functioning of the judicial system, primarily by separating the career paths of judges and prosecutors, and modifying the governance of the Superior Council of the Judiciary (CSM), the body responsible for judicial self-governance. This represents one of the most substantial proposed overhauls of Italy's judicial framework in decades, touching on principles of judicial independence established in the post-war constitution. The referendum is required because the proposed changes involve constitutional amendments, which under Italian law must be approved either by a two-thirds parliamentary majority or by a popular referendum if passed by a simple majority in Parliament. The reform is a flagship policy of the center-right coalition government led by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, which argues it is necessary to enhance the efficiency, impartiality, and separation of powers within the justice system. Critics, including opposition parties and segments of the judiciary, contend the changes could undermine judicial independence and politicize the appointment process. Public and political interest is exceptionally high, as the outcome will shape the balance of power between the judiciary and other branches of government for years to come, with implications for high-profile legal cases and Italy's relationship with European institutions concerned about rule of law standards.

Historical Context

The debate over judicial reform in Italy has deep historical roots, stretching back to the founding of the Republic in 1948. The current Constitution was deliberately designed with a strong, independent judiciary to prevent a return to the authoritarianism of the fascist era. The Superior Council of the Judiciary (CSM) was established as a self-governing body to insulate judges from political pressure. However, the system has faced persistent criticism over decades for perceived inefficiencies and lengthy trial times, with Italy frequently facing condemnation from the European Court of Human Rights for excessive trial durations. A major precedent was the 2006 referendum under Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, which proposed a similar strengthening of executive influence over the judiciary. That referendum failed due to low voter turnout, as quorum requirements were not met. The current reform effort also echoes the controversial 2019 'Severino Law' and subsequent attempts by the Five Star Movement and League coalition to alter judicial accountability rules, which raised concerns with the European Commission. The relationship between the political class and the judiciary has been particularly strained since the 'Clean Hands' anti-corruption investigations of the early 1990s, which led to the collapse of the traditional party system. This historical tension between political desires for reform and the constitutional principle of judicial independence forms the essential backdrop to the 2026 referendum.

Frequently Asked Questions