
$70.24K
1
2

2 markets tracked
No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
Will Trump waive taxes for people earning under $150k? (Before 2027) | Kalshi | 5% |
Will Trump waive taxes for people earning under $150k? (Before June 2026) | Kalshi | 2% |
$70.24K
1
2
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
Before 2026 If the President or Congress waives or ends income taxes for any year on persons earning less than $150,000 a year before X 1, Y then the market resolves to Yes. This includes an executive order or action directing income taxes for households earning less than $150,000 be waived, or equivalently, that the income tax is foregone, eliminated, or nullified, for any year, or a bill becoming law which reduces the federal income tax to 0% for those earning less than $150,000 for any year.
Prediction markets currently give roughly a 1 in 20 chance that President Trump or Congress will eliminate federal income taxes for people earning under $150,000 before 2027. In simpler terms, traders collectively see this as very unlikely to happen. The market reflects a high degree of skepticism, with only a small fraction of bets supporting the idea.
The low probability stems from significant political and practical hurdles. First, completely eliminating a major revenue source like the income tax for a large segment of taxpayers would create a massive budget deficit. The federal government collected over $2 trillion from individual income taxes in 2023. Removing that for most earners would require unprecedented spending cuts or other tax increases that lack political support.
Second, such a change would almost certainly need to pass Congress. Even if President Trump proposed it, the legislative process requires building a majority coalition. Given the current divided Congress and the historic difficulty of passing major tax reforms, the path to a law is extremely narrow. An executive order alone is viewed as an insufficient tool for this policy, as tax law is fundamentally controlled by Congress.
Finally, the proposal does not align with recent tax policy trends. The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, passed under Trump, reduced rates but kept the income tax structure intact. Major policy discussions have focused on adjusting rates and brackets, not eliminating the tax entirely for most Americans.
The primary timeline to watch is the next presidential term, from January 2025 through 2026. Key moments include the release of the President’s first budget proposal in early 2025, which would signal administration priorities. Any major tax legislation would likely need to be introduced and debated in 2025 or early 2026 to pass before the 2026 midterm elections, which could shift the balance of power in Congress. Committee hearings in the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee would be early indicators of serious legislative effort.
Prediction markets have a mixed but generally decent record on political process questions. They are often good at identifying high-stakes legislative hurdles and the low probability of extremely disruptive policy changes. However, they can sometimes underestimate the potential for unexpected political maneuvers. For this specific question, the market is likely a reliable gauge of conventional wisdom in Washington, which views this policy as a long shot due to the colossal fiscal and political challenges involved. The low trading volume suggests limited attention, but the overwhelming consensus on the outcome is clear.
Prediction markets assign a minimal 5% probability to Donald Trump eliminating federal income tax for individuals earning under $150,000 before 2027. This price, trading at 5¢ on Kalshi, indicates the market views the policy as highly improbable. With only $69,000 in total trading volume, liquidity is thin, suggesting limited trader conviction and higher volatility in the price.
The low probability reflects immense political and fiscal barriers. Eliminating this tax would remove a primary revenue source for the federal government, potentially creating a multi-trillion dollar budget shortfall over a decade. Historical precedent also weighs heavily. No modern administration, including Trump's first term which passed tax cuts via the 2017 TCJA, has proposed zeroing out income tax for a broad income bracket. The 2017 law reduced rates but maintained the tax structure. Campaign rhetoric often includes dramatic tax proposals, but markets are pricing based on the legislative reality of a closely divided Congress unlikely to pass such a deficit-exploding measure.
A significant shift would require concrete legislative action, making the odds sensitive to the 2024 election outcome and subsequent GOP control of Congress. If Republicans secure a trifecta and draft a bill with this specific provision, the market price would rise rapidly. However, even with unified control, intense scrutiny from deficit hawks within the party and questions about alternative revenue sources would present major hurdles. The market will react to specific policy language in the Republican Party platform or a detailed Trump campaign proposal, but current pricing suggests traders expect any final plan to be a more traditional rate reduction, not a full waiver.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
This prediction market examines whether former President Donald Trump, if elected in 2024, would successfully implement a policy eliminating federal income tax for individuals earning under $150,000 annually before 2026. The market resolves to 'Yes' if, before the specified date, either the President through executive action or Congress through legislation formally waives, nullifies, or reduces to 0% the federal income tax liability for this income group for any tax year. This represents a specific test of a major campaign promise that would constitute one of the largest tax cuts in U.S. history. The topic gained prominence following Trump's public statements in 2024, where he proposed ending income taxes for workers and replacing the revenue with tariffs and other measures. The proposal exists within a broader political debate about tax reform, fiscal policy, and economic populism. Interest stems from its radical departure from the current tax system, its potential economic impact, and the significant political and procedural hurdles required for implementation, including navigating a potentially divided Congress. Observers are tracking whether this remains a rhetorical flourish or evolves into concrete legislative or executive action.
The proposal to eliminate income tax for a large segment of the population has few direct precedents in modern U.S. history. The federal income tax was made permanent by the 16th Amendment in 1913. The most significant historical parallel is the Tax Reform Act of 1986 under President Ronald Reagan, which simplified the code and lowered rates but did not eliminate the tax for any broad income group. More recently, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), signed by President Trump, provided temporary cuts for most brackets but kept the basic structure intact. The TCJA reduced the top corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% and temporarily lowered individual rates, with many provisions set to expire after 2025. Trump's new proposal is more radical, aiming for a full elimination of liability for a defined group. The idea of funding government via tariffs instead of income taxes echoes pre-20th century U.S. fiscal policy, when tariffs were the federal government's primary revenue source before the income tax's establishment. This represents a potential historical reversal of a century of fiscal policy.
The economic implications are vast. Eliminating income tax for those earning under $150,000 would remove a primary revenue stream for the federal government, which collected approximately $2.9 trillion from individual income taxes in fiscal year 2023. Proponents argue it would boost take-home pay and stimulate economic growth. Critics, including most mainstream economists, warn it would dramatically increase the federal deficit, potentially exceeding $1 trillion annually, unless paired with unprecedented spending cuts or alternative revenue sources like massive tariffs. Politically, the proposal is a defining plank of Trump's 2024 economic agenda, testing the appeal of populist tax policy. Its feasibility would hinge on the 2024 election results and the subsequent composition of Congress. Socially, it would directly affect an estimated 80-90% of U.S. tax filers, representing a major shift in the relationship between citizens and federal government funding.
As of October 2024, the proposal remains a campaign promise from Donald Trump without detailed legislative text. The Trump campaign has not released a formal plan outlining how the lost revenue would be replaced. The proposal faces immediate skepticism from Democrats and some fiscal conservatives. For it to advance, Trump must first win the November 2024 presidential election. Subsequently, Republicans would need to gain unified control of Congress to have a viable path to pass such legislation before 2026. No committee hearings or draft bills have been initiated.
Yes. In June 2024, Donald Trump proposed the idea of eliminating federal income taxes for workers and replacing the lost revenue with tariffs and other measures. The specific policy discussed in prediction markets is ending income tax for individuals earning under $150,000 per year.
Trump and his advisers have suggested imposing higher tariffs on imported goods as the primary alternative revenue source. Other theoretical options include massive spending cuts or new forms of taxation, but no comprehensive, detailed plan has been formally presented to the public or scored by congressional budget analysts.
Based on the most recent IRS data, approximately 140 million tax filers reported an Adjusted Gross Income under $150,000. This represents about 85% of all filers, meaning the vast majority of American taxpayers would see their federal income tax liability reduced to zero under this proposal.
Legal experts widely agree a president cannot unilaterally abolish a congressionally enacted tax. An executive order attempting to do so would face immediate legal challenges and would likely be ruled an unconstitutional violation of Congress's power of the purse. Lasting change would require an act of Congress.
Key provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act affecting individual tax rates, the standard deduction, and other items are scheduled to expire after December 31, 2025. This creates a natural fiscal cliff that Congress must address, which could provide a legislative vehicle for new tax proposals in 2025.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/binFgi" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Will Trump end income tax for people earning under $150k?"></iframe>