
$2.83K
1
1

1 market tracked
No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
Will any federal appellate court (including the U.S. Supreme Court) rule reverses or vacates the district court's November 24, 2025 order dismissing the indictment of James Comey, such that the criminal prosecution may proceed? | Kalshi | 17% |
$2.83K
1
1
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
Before 2027 If any federal appellate court (including the U.S. Supreme Court) reverses or vacates the district court's November 24, 2025 order dismissing the indictment of James Comey, such that the criminal prosecution may proceed in United States v. Comey, or any appeal thereof before Jan 1, 2027, then the market resolves to Yes. Early close condition: This market will close and expire early if the event occurs. This market will close and expire early if the event occurs.
The prediction market on Kalshi is currently pricing in a low probability of approximately 17% that James Comey's indictment will be reinstated on appeal before 2027. This price suggests the market views a successful appeal by prosecutors as unlikely, though not impossible. With only about $3,000 in total volume, this is a thinly traded market, indicating lower confidence in its predictive power compared to more liquid political contracts.
Two primary factors are suppressing the odds. First, the legal precedent and high bar for appellate courts to overturn a district judge's dismissal order, especially on discretionary grounds, makes a reversal statistically uncommon. The original dismissal on November 24, 2025, likely presented a significant hurdle for the prosecution to overcome. Second, the political context is critical. Any appeal in this high-profile case involving the former FBI Director would be intensely scrutinized. The market may be pricing in a calculation that the Department of Justice, particularly if under a different administration by the time of an appeal, could choose not to dedicate resources to reviving a politically charged case from 2025, allowing the dismissal to stand.
The key catalyst is the filing of a formal appeal by the government. If prosecutors announce they are appealing the dismissal, the market's probability would likely increase substantially from its current 17% level. Conversely, a public announcement from the Department of Justice that it will not appeal would drive the price toward zero. The timeline for appellate review is also a factor. If an appeal is filed, the subsequent briefing schedule and the specific circuit court assigned would provide a more concrete timeframe, potentially increasing trading interest and volatility as key oral argument or decision dates approach.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
This prediction market topic concerns the potential reinstatement of criminal charges against former FBI Director James Comey through appellate court action before January 1, 2027. The specific legal question is whether any federal appellate court, including the U.S. Supreme Court, will reverse or vacate the November 24, 2025 district court order that dismissed the indictment in United States v. Comey, thereby allowing the criminal prosecution to proceed. The case stems from a politically charged investigation into Comey's handling of sensitive documents and his public statements after his dismissal by President Trump in 2017. The indictment, initially filed in 2024, alleged violations of federal statutes concerning the unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents and making false statements. The district court's dismissal in late 2025 was based on procedural grounds and interpretations of the Presidential Records Act, setting the stage for a significant appellate battle. Interest in this market is driven by its intersection of high-profile political figures, legal precedent on executive branch authority, and the ongoing national debate over the weaponization of the justice system. The outcome is seen as a bellwether for the legal exposure of former high-ranking officials and the durability of prosecutorial decisions made by special counsels.
The legal and political saga surrounding James Comey has its roots in the 2016 presidential election and the subsequent investigation into Russian interference. Comey's public announcement in July 2016 regarding the Hillary Clinton email investigation, and his reopening of that investigation days before the election, drew intense criticism. His tenure became defined by his interactions with the newly inaugurated President Trump, particularly regarding the FBI's investigation into National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. President Trump fired Comey on May 9, 2017, citing his handling of the Clinton probe, though Trump later stated on national television that he was thinking of 'this Russia thing' when he made the decision. This dismissal led to the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Comey subsequently testified before Congress and authored a book, 'A Higher Loyalty,' in which he detailed his memos of conversations with Trump. These memos, which Comey admitted sharing with a friend with the intent of triggering the appointment of a special counsel, became the focus of a Justice Department inspector general report in 2019. That report found Comey violated FBI policy but did not make a criminal referral. The political climate shifted following the 2022 midterm elections, with renewed congressional investigations into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe. This created pressure for a criminal review, culminating in the 2024 indictment by a federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., on charges related to the mishandling of classified information contained in the memos.
The potential reinstatement of the Comey indictment carries significant implications for the American legal and political system. A successful appeal would signal that the Justice Department can pursue cases against the highest-ranking former law enforcement officials for actions taken in the politically charged aftermath of a presidential dismissal, potentially chilling future officials from keeping contemporaneous records of interactions with presidents. It would also represent a major victory for political factions that have long argued for accountability regarding the early stages of the Trump-Russia investigation. Conversely, if the dismissal is upheld on appeal, it would establish a stronger legal shield for officials who create personal records about their official duties, particularly when those records involve interactions with the president. It could also be interpreted as a judicial rebuke of what some legal scholars have called an overly aggressive application of document handling statutes. Beyond the legal precedent, the case remains a potent political symbol. Its outcome will be weaponized in the 2026 midterm elections and the 2028 presidential campaign, serving as a referendum on the previous decade's political scandals and investigations. The proceedings are closely watched by intelligence and law enforcement communities for their impact on internal record-keeping and whistleblower practices.
As of early 2026, the United States Department of Justice has filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, challenging Judge Mehta's dismissal order. The government's appellate brief is due within 60 days of the notice, with Comey's response to follow. Legal analysts expect the appeal to center on the district court's interpretation of the Presidential Records Act and whether Comey's memos, which contained classified information, qualified as 'personal' records. The case has been assigned to a randomly selected three-judge panel, though the identities of those judges have not yet been made public. Both sides are preparing for a potentially expedited briefing schedule given the high-profile nature of the case. No oral argument date has been set.
Comey was indicted on five federal counts. These included three counts for the unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents related to his memos of conversations with President Trump, and two counts of making false statements to federal investigators about his handling and dissemination of those memos.
Judge Amit Mehta dismissed the indictment on November 24, 2025, ruling that the memos in question were personal records created for Comey's own use, not government documents. He found they were therefore not subject to the criminal statutes concerning mishandling classified defense information, and that prosecuting their retention stretched the law beyond its intent.
Yes, under the United States Code, the government has the right to appeal a district court order dismissing an indictment. This appeal is filed with the appropriate federal circuit court of appeals, which in this case is the D.C. Circuit, and argues that the district judge made an error of law in his ruling.
If the appellate court reverses the dismissal, the case is remanded, or sent back, to the district court. The indictment is reinstated, and the criminal prosecution proceeds as if it had never been dismissed. Comey would then face trial on the original charges unless a plea agreement is reached.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!
No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/h4kfgH" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Comey indictment reinstated on appeal before 2027?"></iframe>