
$4.01K
1
1

1 market tracked

No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Poly | 35% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve to "Yes" if an official agreement over Iranian nuclear research and/or nuclear weapon development, defined as a publicly announced mutual agreement, is reached between the United States and Iran by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. If such an agreement is officially reached before the resolution date, this market will resolve to "Yes", regardless of if/when the agreement goes into effect. Agreements that include the United Sta
Prediction markets currently assign a low probability to a new US-Iran nuclear deal being reached before 2027. On Polymarket, the "Yes" share trades at approximately 35%. This price indicates the market sees a successful diplomatic outcome as unlikely within this timeframe, though not impossible. With only about $4,000 in total market volume, this remains a speculative, low-liquidity contract, meaning prices could be more sensitive to news events.
The primary factor suppressing the odds is the entrenched geopolitical deadlock. Since the US withdrawal from the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) in 2018 and Iran's subsequent acceleration of its nuclear program, diplomatic channels have remained largely frozen. The current US administration has stated that a return to the 2015 deal is off the table, focusing instead on increasing pressure and sanctions, while Iran continues to enrich uranium to near-weapons-grade levels.
Furthermore, domestic politics in both nations create significant headwinds. In the US, bipartisan opposition to engaging with Iran is strong, making a major diplomatic initiative politically risky, especially during an election year and the subsequent transition period. In Iran, hardline factions oppose concessions to the West, viewing a robust nuclear program as a key strategic asset and deterrent.
The most immediate potential catalyst is the outcome of the 2024 US presidential election. A second term for President Biden could see a renewed, albeit cautious, push for indirect negotiations in 2025, potentially raising the odds. A victory by a different administration could swing the odds significantly in either direction, depending on its stated foreign policy platform toward Iran.
A major, unforeseen geopolitical crisis or escalation in the Middle East could also force a rapid diplomatic re-engagement, serving as a potential circuit-breaker to the current stalemate. Conversely, a further provocation, such as an Iranian advance toward weaponization or a direct military clash, could drive the probability toward zero. Market participants should watch for any resumption of talks in Vienna or Doha as the first concrete sign of a thaw.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$4.01K
1
1
This prediction market addresses whether the United States and Iran will reach an official agreement on Iran's nuclear program by December 31, 2026. The topic centers on the potential revival or replacement of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal, which has been a central point of international diplomacy and regional security for over a decade. The market resolves to 'Yes' upon the public announcement of a mutual agreement, regardless of its subsequent implementation timeline. The core issue involves balancing Iran's nuclear ambitions with international non-proliferation goals, a challenge that has persisted through multiple U.S. administrations and Iranian governments. Recent years have seen the original 2015 deal effectively collapse, leading to heightened tensions, increased Iranian nuclear activity, and a complex diplomatic stalemate. Interest in this market stems from its implications for global energy markets, Middle East stability, non-proliferation efforts, and U.S. foreign policy. The outcome will significantly impact geopolitical risk assessments, oil prices, and security dynamics in a volatile region. Observers closely monitor indirect negotiations, domestic politics in both countries, and the technical status of Iran's nuclear program as key indicators.
The modern diplomatic effort to constrain Iran's nuclear program began in earnest in the early 2000s, leading to years of multilateral negotiations. The landmark Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was finalized on July 14, 2015, between Iran and the P5+1 nations (the United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia, China, and Germany). The agreement imposed strict limits on Iran's nuclear activities in exchange for the lifting of international economic sanctions. For a period, the deal was largely successful in curtailing Iran's nuclear program, as verified by the IAEA. However, the landscape shifted dramatically on May 8, 2018, when U.S. President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew the United States from the JCPOA and re-imposed crippling sanctions on Iran in a policy of 'maximum pressure.' In response, beginning in 2019, Iran started a deliberate and incremental breach of the deal's key restrictions. It increased its stockpile of low-enriched uranium, began enriching uranium to higher purity levels (up to 60%), and advanced research on centrifuges. This cycle of U.S. withdrawal and Iranian escalation created the current impasse, with the original agreement's benefits for both sides largely evaporated. The Biden administration's attempt to revive the deal through indirect talks in Vienna, starting in April 2021, has yet to yield a breakthrough, leaving the diplomatic process in a state of prolonged uncertainty.
A renewed U.S.-Iran nuclear agreement would have profound implications for global security and economics. Success would significantly reduce the immediate risk of a nuclear-armed Iran, reinforce the global non-proliferation regime, and potentially de-escalate tensions in the Middle East. It could lead to the return of over one million barrels per day of Iranian oil to the global market, helping to stabilize and potentially lower international oil prices, which affects economies worldwide. Conversely, failure to reach a deal increases the likelihood of continued regional instability, a potential nuclear crisis, and a higher risk of military confrontation. For Iran, the lifting of sanctions is critical for its crippled economy, which has suffered from high inflation, currency devaluation, and reduced oil exports. Domestically in the U.S., the issue remains highly politicized, with any potential agreement facing intense scrutiny and likely challenges in Congress, affecting America's credibility and leadership on the world stage. The outcome also influences the strategic calculations of regional powers like Israel and Saudi Arabia, who view Iran's nuclear program as an existential threat.
As of mid-2024, diplomatic efforts to revive the nuclear deal are at a standstill. Indirect talks between the U.S. and Iran have not been held in over a year. Iran continues to expand its nuclear program, operating advanced centrifuges and maintaining a large stockpile of highly enriched uranium. The IAEA reports ongoing difficulties in its monitoring and verification work due to Iranian restrictions. The U.S. continues to enforce sanctions while also engaging in prisoner swap arrangements, a issue often linked to but separate from the nuclear negotiations. The focus has partially shifted to containing Iran's nuclear advances through regional diplomacy and pressure, rather than a comprehensive bilateral agreement. The 2024 U.S. presidential election adds another layer of uncertainty, as the future American approach to the issue may change significantly depending on the outcome.
The original deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), was reached in 2015. It restricted Iran's nuclear program by limiting uranium enrichment, stockpiles, and centrifuge research in exchange for the lifting of international economic sanctions. The International Atomic Energy Agency verified Iran's compliance until the U.S. withdrew in 2018.
President Donald Trump withdrew the United States from the JCPOA in May 2018, calling it a 'horrible, one-sided deal.' His administration argued it did not permanently prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, did not address Iran's ballistic missile program, and did not curb its regional activities. The U.S. then re-imposed severe sanctions.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!

No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/i5ASeb" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="US-Iran nuclear deal before 2027?"></iframe>