
$1.06K
1
1

1 market tracked

No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Poly | 18% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve to "Yes" if a U.S. bank with total assets exceeding $50 billion as of November 11, 2025 (see:https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/lbr/current/), is bailed out by the U.S. federal government by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise this market will resolve to “No”. A bailout is defined as any of these actions in direct response to directly related to solvency, liquidity, or capital adequacy concerns. -Establishing a Federal Reserve emergency lending facility -Cre
Prediction markets currently assign a low probability to a major U.S. bank bailout before 2027. On Polymarket, the "Yes" share trades at approximately 21¢, implying the market sees roughly a 21% chance of a federal bailout for a bank with over $50 billion in assets by the end of 2026. This price suggests such an event is viewed as a plausible tail risk, but far from the base case scenario for the financial sector over the next two years.
Two primary factors are suppressing the probability. First, the regulatory environment has been fortified since the 2008 crisis and the 2023 regional banking stress. Enhanced capital requirements, annual stress tests, and the existence of established resolution frameworks like the FDIC's orderly liquidation authority are designed to prevent failures from requiring taxpayer-funded bailouts. Second, current economic conditions, while uncertain, do not mirror the systemic liquidity crises that precipitated past interventions. Major bank balance sheets remain generally strong, with high-quality liquid assets.
The thin trading volume, however, indicates this is a lightly held view and may not fully represent deep institutional consensus.
The odds could rise significantly due to an unforeseen macroeconomic shock. A severe recession leading to substantial defaults in commercial real estate or other loan portfolios could erode capital at one or more institutions. Similarly, a rapid rise in unemployment or a sharp, sustained downturn in asset prices could create a liquidity crunch that overwhelms existing regulatory safeguards. Geopolitical events disrupting financial markets could also be a catalyst.
Key dates to watch are Federal Reserve stress test results and quarterly earnings reports from systemically important banks. Any indication of severe, concentrated losses or a loss of market confidence could cause this probability to spike rapidly from its current low level. The resolution of this market will ultimately depend on whether the post-2008 reforms hold under extreme financial pressure.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$1.06K
1
1
This prediction market addresses whether a major U.S. bank, defined as one with total assets exceeding $50 billion, will receive a federal government bailout before the end of 2026. A bailout is specifically defined as the establishment of a Federal Reserve emergency lending facility or other direct government intervention in response to solvency, liquidity, or capital adequacy concerns. The question emerges against a backdrop of persistent economic uncertainty, elevated interest rates, and ongoing scrutiny of the banking sector's health following the regional banking crisis of 2023. The market's resolution date of December 31, 2026, creates a defined timeline for assessing regulatory and economic pressures on systemically important financial institutions. Interest in this topic stems from its profound implications for financial stability, taxpayer liability, and the political economy of banking regulation. Market participants, policymakers, and the public are monitoring asset quality, commercial real estate exposures, and the potential for contagion that could necessitate extraordinary government support.
The modern framework for U.S. bank bailouts was largely shaped by the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. In response to the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008, Congress passed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, which created the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). TARP included the Capital Purchase Program, which injected funds into hundreds of banks, including major institutions like Citigroup and Bank of America, to stabilize the financial system. This era also saw the controversial bailout of insurance giant AIG and the creation of temporary, broad-based emergency facilities by the Federal Reserve. The political backlash to these interventions led to the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which aimed to limit future bailouts by establishing orderly liquidation authority and requiring living wills for large banks. However, the regional banking crisis of March 2023, which saw the failures of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic Bank, tested these post-2008 reforms. Regulators invoked systemic risk exceptions to protect all depositors, and the Fed established a new emergency lending facility, the Bank Term Funding Program, demonstrating that the government's bailout toolkit remains active.
The prospect of a major bank bailout carries significant economic and political weight. Economically, a bailout could prevent a cascading financial crisis that freezes credit markets, triggers widespread bank runs, and leads to a severe recession. However, it also creates moral hazard, potentially encouraging excessive risk-taking by banks that believe they are 'too big to fail.' Such interventions directly impact taxpayers, who may ultimately bear the cost, and can distort market competition by favoring large, systemically important institutions over smaller ones. Politically, bailouts are deeply unpopular, often viewed as rescuing Wall Street at the expense of Main Street. A major bailout before 2027 could ignite fierce congressional debates, influence the 2024 and 2026 elections, and lead to calls for drastic reforms to banking regulation and the Federal Reserve's powers. The social contract between the public, the government, and the financial system is tested during these events, with long-term consequences for trust in institutions and the structure of the American economy.
As of late 2024, the U.S. banking system is stable but faces headwinds. The emergency Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP) expired in March 2024, removing a key backstop. Regulators, including the FDIC and the Federal Reserve, are implementing stricter capital and liquidity proposals for large banks, known as the 'Basel III Endgame,' which the industry opposes. Persistent high interest rates from the Fed continue to pressure bank balance sheets by depressing the value of held-to-maturity securities and increasing funding costs. Specific vulnerabilities are being monitored, including banks with high exposure to commercial real estate and those reliant on uninsured deposits. While no major bank is in imminent distress, regulators are conducting heightened supervision and stress testing to assess resilience to potential economic shocks.
For this market, a bailout is specifically defined as the U.S. federal government establishing a Federal Reserve emergency lending facility or taking other direct action in response to a major bank's solvency, liquidity, or capital adequacy concerns. This does not include routine central bank operations or private-sector acquisitions without government financial support.
The Federal Reserve publishes a quarterly list of large banking organizations. As of late 2024, this includes approximately 37 institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, U.S. Bancorp, and Truist Financial, among others.
The most recent significant interventions were during the March 2023 regional banking crisis. While not a direct capital injection into a single megabank, regulators used systemic risk exceptions to protect all depositors at Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, and the Fed created the $164 billion Bank Term Funding Program to backstop the broader banking system.
The 2010 Dodd-Frank Act aimed to end 'too big to fail' bailouts by creating an orderly liquidation process for failing systemic banks, prohibiting the use of taxpayer money to bail out shareholders, and requiring living wills. However, it preserved the Fed's emergency lending authority under Section 13(3), which was used in 2023.
A systemic risk exception is triggered by a two-thirds vote of the FDIC and Federal Reserve boards and the Treasury Secretary's approval. It allows the FDIC to protect all depositors, including those with uninsured funds, if a bank's failure is deemed to pose a risk to the entire financial system, as was done in 2023.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!

No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/iT0h2p" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Major U.S. bank bailout before 2027?"></iframe>