$15.24K
1
11
$15.24K
1
11
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve according to the company that owns the model with the third-highest arena score based on the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard (https://lmarena.ai/) when the table under the "Leaderboard" tab is checked on March 31, 2026, 12:00 PM ET. Results from the "Arena Score" section on the Leaderboard tab of https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text with the style control off will be used to resolve this market. If two models are tied for the third best arena score at this market's check
Prediction markets currently assign a 74% probability that Google will have the third-best AI model by the end of January 2026, according to the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard. This price, trading at 74¢ on Polymarket, indicates the market views this outcome as the clear favorite. A 74% chance suggests a strong consensus, though it still leaves a meaningful 26% probability for an alternative company to claim the spot. The market has attracted moderate liquidity with $366,000 in volume, lending credibility to the current price signal.
The high probability for Google is primarily driven by the consistent performance of its Gemini models on public benchmarks and the expectation of a major near-term release. Google has publicly signaled an aggressive roadmap, with its "Gemini 2.0" or "Gemini Ultra" iteration expected to launch imminently, which analysts project could leapfrog several current top contenders. Historically, the Chatbot Arena's top ranks have been dominated by OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google, creating a perceived "big three" dynamic. The market is essentially pricing in that Google will successfully reclaim a podium position from current holders like Anthropic's Claude or a leading open-source model.
Furthermore, the specific structure of this market, which isolates the third-best position, is crucial. It implies the market expects OpenAI to almost certainly hold the top spot, and a close race for second between entities like Anthropic and potentially Meta. This leaves the third position as the most volatile and contested rank among the giants, where Google's imminent release is seen as the decisive catalyst.
The primary risk to the current consensus is a weaker-than-expected performance from Google's upcoming model. If its Arena Score fails to surpass the current third-place holder, the odds will shift dramatically. Conversely, a "wow" release could see this contract trade above 90%. The 15-day window until resolution is critical, as it encompasses the expected Google launch and subsequent benchmarking.
A major update from another competitor, such as a surprise release from xAI's Grok, Meta's Llama, or a dark horse like a Chinese model (e.g., Qwen or DeepSeek), could also disrupt the hierarchy. The Chatbot Arena scores can be volatile with new entries. Monitoring the leaderboard for live score updates in the final week of January will be essential, as early community voting could signal the final ranking before the official resolution.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
This prediction market topic focuses on identifying which company will possess the third most capable publicly accessible large language model (LLM) at the end of January 2026, as measured by the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard. The Chatbot Arena, operated by the Large Model Systems Organization (LMSYS Org), is a crowd-sourced, competitive evaluation platform where users vote on the quality of responses from anonymous AI models in head-to-head battles. The resulting 'Arena Score' is an Elo-based rating that has become a widely cited benchmark for real-world conversational AI performance. The market resolves specifically to the company owning the model with the third-highest Arena Score when the leaderboard is checked on January 31, 2026, at 12:00 PM Eastern Time. This topic sits at the intersection of competitive AI benchmarking, corporate technological prowess, and market speculation. Interest stems from the high-stakes race for AI supremacy, where leaderboard positioning influences developer adoption, investor confidence, and public perception. The focus on the third-place position, rather than first, acknowledges the dynamic and often close competition just behind the leading frontier models, making it a particularly volatile and interesting prediction target.
The competitive benchmarking of AI models has evolved significantly since the early 2020s. Prior to the Chatbot Arena's launch in May 2023, model evaluation relied heavily on static academic benchmarks like MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) or HELM (Holistic Evaluation of Language Models). These tests, while useful, often failed to capture nuanced conversational ability and real-world user preference. The Chatbot Arena introduced a novel, crowd-sourced 'battle' format where two anonymous models respond to a user's prompt, and the user votes for the better response. This method, generating an Elo rating akin to chess, quickly gained traction for its practical relevance. Historically, the top of the leaderboard has been dominated by a small group. In 2023 and early 2024, OpenAI's GPT-4 held a sustained lead. The release of Anthropic's Claude 3 Opus in March 2024 marked a significant shift, briefly claiming the top spot and demonstrating the volatility of the rankings. Google's Gemini Pro 1.5 and Ultra, along with Meta's Llama 3 70B, have also jockeyed for position in the top five. This historical churn just below the absolute leader sets a precedent for the intense competition expected for the third-place slot in 2026.
The ranking of AI models on a respected public leaderboard has substantial economic and strategic implications. For the companies involved, a top-three position serves as a powerful marketing tool, attracting enterprise customers, developer mindshare, and venture capital. It signals technological maturity and can directly impact valuation and partnership opportunities. For the broader tech ecosystem, the constant jockeying for position drives rapid innovation and investment in compute infrastructure, algorithmic efficiency, and safety research. This competition accelerates the capabilities of AI tools available to the public and businesses, influencing productivity software, creative applications, and research methodologies. The outcome of this specific prediction is a proxy for measuring which organization, beyond the obvious market leaders, is most effectively translating research into a product that users genuinely prefer. This has downstream consequences for talent acquisition, as top AI researchers are drawn to organizations demonstrating tangible progress, and for policy debates around AI governance, where leading models often face heightened scrutiny.
As of late 2024, the Chatbot Arena leaderboard is in a state of intense competition. OpenAI's o1-preview and GPT-4 Turbo variants hold top positions, closely challenged by Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Opus. Google's Gemini models and Meta's Llama 3 70B are strong contenders within the top ten. The landscape is dynamic, with new model releases from these major players and from companies like xAI and Mistral AI occurring every few months, each capable of reshuffling the rankings. The race for third place is particularly fluid, often separated by only a few Elo points, making it highly sensitive to incremental improvements and new evaluations.
The Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard is a public ranking of large language models based on anonymous, crowd-sourced user evaluations. Users chat with two randomly selected models without knowing which is which, vote for the better response, and these votes generate an Elo rating score for each model, reflecting real-world conversational performance.
The Arena Score is an Elo rating. Each model starts with a baseline score. When two models are compared by a user, the winner gains Elo points and the loser loses points, with the amount transferred based on the expected probability of winning. Over hundreds of thousands of battles, this creates a stable ranking of relative strength.
The market description specifies that if two models are tied for the third-best Arena Score, the market will resolve to the company whose model was listed first on the leaderboard table at the resolution time. The order on the lmarena.ai leaderboard page is the definitive tiebreaker.
No. Only models that have been submitted to and are accessible through the public Chatbot Arena interface are included on the leaderboard. Proprietary, internal, or gated models that are not available for public testing on the Arena platform are not ranked.
The leaderboard updates continuously as new user votes are processed. However, the scores stabilize over time. The market uses a single snapshot taken precisely on January 31, 2026, at 12:00 PM ET, not an average or range of scores.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!
11 markets tracked
No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Poly | 49% |
 | Poly | 17% |
 | Poly | 12% |
 | Poly | 8% |
 | Poly | 7% |
 | Poly | 6% |
 | Poly | 1% |
 | Poly | 0% |
 | Poly | 0% |
 | Poly | 0% |
 | Poly | 0% |
No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/jTzkl6" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Which company has the third best AI model end of March?"></iframe>