
$18.37M
1
11

$18.37M
1
11
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve according to the company that owns the model that has the highest arena score based on the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard (https://lmarena.ai/) when the table under the "Leaderboard" tab is checked on February 28, 2026, 12:00 PM ET. Results from the "Arena Score" section on the Leaderboard tab of https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text with the style control off will be used to resolve this market. If two models are tied for the highest arena score at this market's check ti
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
This prediction market focuses on determining which company possesses the most capable publicly accessible large language model (LLM) at the end of February 2026. The outcome will be determined by the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard, a crowdsourced evaluation platform where users vote on the quality of responses from competing AI models in blind tests. The model with the highest 'Arena Score' on February 28, 2026, at 12:00 PM Eastern Time will decide the winning company. The Chatbot Arena, created by researchers from UC Berkeley and other institutions, has become a widely cited benchmark in the AI community because it relies on human preference judgments rather than automated metrics, which can sometimes be gamed. The market reflects intense competition in the generative AI sector, where companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta are racing to develop superior models. Leadership on the Arena leaderboard is seen as a strong indicator of real-world usability and conversational quality, directly influencing developer adoption, investor confidence, and public perception. The specific date of February 2026 is significant as it follows a period of expected rapid advancement, with many companies targeting major model releases in late 2025 and early 2026. This market allows participants to bet on which organization's research and engineering efforts will yield the top-performing model at that future checkpoint.
The competitive benchmarking of AI models began in earnest with the release of OpenAI's GPT-3 in 2020, which demonstrated unprecedented few-shot learning capabilities. However, standardized, human-centric evaluation was lacking. In response, the LMSYS Org launched the Chatbot Arena in May 2023 as a side-by-side comparison tool where users vote on which of two anonymized model responses they prefer. This created the Arena Score, an Elo rating that reflects real-world user preference. Throughout 2023 and 2024, the leaderboard saw frequent changes at the top. OpenAI's GPT-4 Turbo held a long reign after its March 2023 release. In March 2024, Anthropic's Claude 3 Opus briefly surpassed GPT-4, marking the first time another model claimed the top spot in over a year. This event demonstrated that the lead was contestable. Google's Gemini Ultra 1.0 and Meta's Llama 3 70B also entered the top ranks, creating a crowded field of elite models separated by narrow margins. The historical pattern shows that new model releases typically cause significant leaderboard volatility, followed by periods of stability until the next major release. The prediction for February 2026 exists within this context of rapid, leapfrogging advancements where a company's lead can be transient.
Leadership in AI model capability has substantial economic and strategic consequences. The company with the top model can command premium pricing for API access, attract the best AI research talent, and secure dominant partnerships across industries. For developers and businesses, the leading model often becomes the default choice for building applications, creating a powerful network effect and ecosystem lock-in. This competition also drives global investment in AI infrastructure, with billions spent on GPU clusters and data centers. On a broader level, the entity that develops the most capable AI may gain significant influence over the direction of the technology, impacting norms around safety, transparency, and accessibility. The outcome influences national competitiveness, with American and Chinese firms in a distinct race. The resolution of this market will provide a snapshot of which organization's approach to AI research—whether focused on scaling, novel architectures, superior training data, or alignment techniques—is proving most effective at that moment.
As of late 2024, the Chatbot Arena leaderboard is highly dynamic. OpenAI has released GPT-4o, an optimized version of GPT-4, which maintains a strong position. Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet model has also performed exceptionally well. Google's Gemini 1.5 Pro and Meta's Llama 3.1 405B are close competitors. The gap between the top five models is often within 20 Arena Score points. All major players have publicly discussed ambitious plans for next-generation models. OpenAI has hinted at GPT-5, Google is developing Gemini 2.0, Anthropic is working on the Claude 4 series, and Meta has confirmed Llama 4 is in training. The current landscape suggests a multi-way race where any of these forthcoming models could lead the board in February 2026.
The Chatbot Arena is a benchmark platform created by LMSYS where users compare responses from two anonymous AI models and vote for the better one. These votes generate an Elo rating for each model, published as the Arena Score on a public leaderboard. It is considered a reliable measure of real-world conversational quality.
The leaderboard updates continuously as new votes are cast. However, for the purpose of this prediction market, only the scores visible on the leaderboard at the specific date and time of February 28, 2026, 12:00 PM ET will be used for resolution.
The market description states that if two models are tied for the highest score, the market will resolve to the company whose model was listed first on the leaderboard at the check time. The leaderboard typically lists models in descending order of score, so the tiebreaker would be the one appearing higher on the page.
No. The Chatbot Arena leaderboard only includes models that are publicly accessible, either through an API or a direct demo. Proprietary models from companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google are included because they offer public access, but internal research models without public interfaces are not listed.
LMSYS implements several anti-manipulation measures, including vote anonymization, CAPTCHAs, and rate limiting. The scale of voting, with millions of votes, also makes meaningful manipulation difficult and costly. The platform is widely trusted within the AI community for its integrity.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
11 markets tracked

No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Poly | 93% |
![]() | Poly | 6% |
![]() | Poly | 1% |
![]() | Poly | 1% |
![]() | Poly | 1% |
![]() | Poly | 0% |
![]() | Poly | 0% |
![]() | Poly | 0% |
![]() | Poly | 0% |
![]() | Poly | 0% |
![]() | Poly | 0% |





No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/lCZvbX" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Which company has the best AI model end of February?"></iframe>