
$39.17K
1
1

1 market tracked
No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
Will Trump make a new free trade agreement with China before Jan 20, 2029? | Kalshi | 27% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
During his term If a new free trade agreement with China has become law before January 20, 2029, then the market resolves to Yes. Early close condition: This market will close and expire early if the event occurs. This market will close and expire early if the event occurs.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$39.17K
1
1
This prediction market addresses whether former President Donald Trump will successfully negotiate and implement a new free trade agreement that becomes law before January 20, 2029, should he win the 2024 presidential election. The question centers on Trump's trade policy agenda for a potential second term, which he has signaled would be a central focus. During his first administration from 2017 to 2021, Trump pursued an 'America First' trade policy, renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) into the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and initiating a trade conflict with China. He has consistently criticized multilateral trade deals and advocated for bilateral agreements that he argues better protect American workers and industries. Interest in this topic stems from the significant economic and geopolitical implications of U.S. trade policy, affecting global supply chains, inflation, diplomatic relations, and domestic manufacturing. Observers are analyzing Trump's campaign rhetoric, his advisors' statements, and the political feasibility of passing new trade deals through Congress to gauge the likelihood of this outcome.
Modern U.S. presidential authority to negotiate trade agreements stems from the Trade Act of 1974 and subsequent renewals of Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), also known as 'fast-track' authority. TPA, last granted in 2015 and expired in 2021, allows the President to negotiate deals that Congress can approve or reject but not amend, streamlining the process. Historically, major agreements like NAFTA (1994) and the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA, 2005) were passed this way. Donald Trump's first term marked a significant departure from decades of bipartisan support for trade liberalization. He withdrew from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) on his third day in office in 2017, calling it a 'rape of our country.' His administration then focused on renegotiating NAFTA, culminating in the USMCA, which passed Congress with bipartisan support and was signed into law in January 2020. Simultaneously, Trump initiated a trade war with China under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, resulting in tariffs on approximately $370 billion of Chinese imports and a limited 'Phase One' trade deal signed in January 2020. This history demonstrates Trump's preference for bilateral negotiations and confrontational tactics over multilateral frameworks.
The pursuit of new free trade agreements under a potential second Trump administration would have profound economic and geopolitical consequences. Economically, new deals could reshape global supply chains, affect consumer prices through tariff changes, and impact specific sectors like agriculture, automotive, and technology. Agreements could offer new market access for U.S. exporters but also potentially trigger retaliatory measures from excluded trading partners. Politically, trade policy is deeply intertwined with U.S. strategic competition with China. A new administration might prioritize deals with allies in Asia and Europe to create a united economic front, or it might pursue more transactional bilateral pacts. Domestically, the process would test the limits of presidential trade authority and congressional willingness to delegate power, especially in a potentially divided government. The outcome would signal the long-term direction of American engagement with the global economy, affecting international business confidence and the rules-based trading system.
As of late 2024, Donald Trump is the Republican nominee for president, campaigning on a robust trade agenda that includes proposed universal and China-specific tariffs. No new free trade agreements are being actively negotiated by the U.S. government under the Biden administration, which has focused on the non-tariff IPEF framework and enforcement of existing deals like the USMCA. The Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) necessary to fast-track congressional approval of new agreements expired in 2021 and has not been renewed. The political landscape for ratification is uncertain, depending on the results of the November 2024 elections for the presidency, Senate, and House of Representatives.
Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) is a temporary power Congress grants to the President to negotiate trade agreements that can be voted on with an up-or-down vote, without amendment. It is crucial because without TPA, any trade deal sent to Congress could be amended indefinitely, making passage extremely difficult. TPA expired in July 2021 and would need to be renewed by a new Congress for a President to efficiently pass new agreements.
Based on first-term priorities and recent statements, likely targets include the United Kingdom (where talks previously stalled), Taiwan (as a strategic counter to China), and potentially other Indo-Pacific allies like Japan or India on a bilateral basis. Trump has also mentioned the possibility of a new deal with China to replace the Phase One agreement, though this would be highly complex.
The timeline varies significantly. The USMCA negotiation took approximately 14 months, followed by another year for legislative approval and implementation. Complex agreements can take multiple years from start to finish, meaning an agreement started in 2025 might not become law until 2027 or 2028, close to the deadline of this prediction market.
Yes, a President generally has the authority to withdraw from trade agreements, as Trump did with the Trans-Pacific Partnership. However, withdrawal from a ratified agreement like the USMCA could face legal challenges and would certainly trigger major economic disruption and congressional opposition, making unilateral replacement with a new deal politically fraught.
A free trade agreement is a negotiated pact between countries to reduce or eliminate tariffs and other trade barriers. A trade war involves escalating, retaliatory tariffs imposed without a cooperative agreement, aimed at coercing trading partners. Trump's first term featured both: a trade war with China and a renegotiated free trade agreement (USMCA) with Mexico and Canada.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!
No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/li7LYx" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Will Trump make a new free trade agreement with China?"></iframe>