
$114.22K
1
1

1 market tracked

No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Poly | 5% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve to “Yes” if, Ukraine signs any written instrument (e.g., treaty, ceasefire/armistice, framework/“roadmap,” exchange of letters, or mediated agreement text) that: (i) includes both Ukraine and the Russian Federation as parties, and (ii) either ends hostilities/establishes a ceasefire or commits both sides to a defined process toward ending the war (i.e., stated objective of peace/normalization plus principles, steps, and/or a timetable) by January 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.
Prediction markets currently assign a low probability to a peace agreement being finalized by the deadline. On Polymarket, the "Yes" share trades at 21¢, implying just a 21% chance that Ukraine and Russia will sign a formal peace deal or ceasefire agreement by March 31, 2026. This price suggests the market views a near-term diplomatic resolution as unlikely, though not impossible, within the next 75 days. The moderate trading volume indicates sustained interest from traders assessing geopolitical risk.
Two primary factors are suppressing the probability. First, the entrenched military positions and stated war aims of both nations remain far apart. Ukraine's official stance, backed by key allies, continues to be based on its 2022 borders and security guarantees, terms Russia has repeatedly rejected. Second, there is a notable absence of active, high-level negotiations. Recent diplomatic efforts have been limited to lower-level talks on specific issues like prisoner exchanges, with no public framework for comprehensive peace talks on the horizon. The market is effectively pricing in the continuation of the current stalemate.
The odds could shift significantly with a major, unforeseen geopolitical catalyst. A decisive change on the battlefield that alters the strategic calculus for either Kyiv or Moscow could force parties to the table. Alternatively, a substantial shift in the political or financial support from Ukraine's Western allies, perhaps following key elections in the United States or Europe, could impact Ukraine's negotiating position. The market will closely monitor any official statements from capitals signaling a new willingness to negotiate, but as of now, no such breakthrough is anticipated before the March 31 deadline.
This contract is trading exclusively on Polymarket, so no direct cross-platform arbitrage opportunity exists. The singular listing concentrates all liquidity and price discovery on one platform, making its 21% probability the primary market-derived benchmark for this specific event timeframe.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$114.22K
1
1
This prediction market topic concerns whether Ukraine and Russia will sign a formal peace agreement by March 31, 2026. The resolution criteria are specific, requiring a written instrument signed by both parties that either ends hostilities, establishes a ceasefire, or commits both sides to a defined process toward ending the war with stated objectives, principles, steps, or a timetable. The topic sits at the intersection of international law, diplomacy, and military conflict, with profound implications for European security and global geopolitics. The ongoing full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, which began in February 2022, has created the deadliest conflict in Europe since World War II, making the prospect of a peace deal a subject of intense global speculation and diplomatic effort. Recent developments include stalled battlefield lines, continued Western military aid to Ukraine, and various international peace initiatives, though no direct bilateral negotiations have occurred since early 2022. People are interested in this topic because the outcome will determine the future sovereignty of Ukraine, reshape the European security architecture, impact global energy and food markets, and set precedents for international law regarding territorial integrity and aggression.
The current war has deep roots in the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the subsequent independence of Ukraine in 1991. Tensions escalated in 2014 when Russia annexed Crimea and fomented a separatist conflict in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine. The Minsk agreements, signed in September 2014 and February 2015 under the mediation of France and Germany, attempted to freeze the conflict but failed to be fully implemented, with both sides accusing the other of violations. These agreements established a precedent for internationally mediated formats involving Russia and Ukraine, though they left the fundamental issue of territorial control unresolved. The full-scale invasion launched by Russia on February 24, 2022, shattered the uneasy status quo and rendered the Minsk frameworks obsolete. Early negotiation attempts occurred in Belarus and Turkey in spring 2022, with a draft agreement discussed in Istanbul in March that reportedly included Ukrainian neutrality and security guarantees. These talks collapsed, with both sides blaming the other for the failure, and no high-level bilateral negotiations have taken place since. This history demonstrates the extreme difficulty of achieving a durable peace when core issues of sovereignty and territory remain contested.
A peace deal would have monumental consequences for global security and the international order. It would determine whether the post-Cold War principle that borders cannot be changed by force is upheld or irrevocably damaged, setting a precedent that could encourage aggression elsewhere. For Europe, it would redefine security doctrine, likely leading to permanent, larger NATO deployments in Eastern Europe and increased defense spending across the continent. Economically, a settlement could stabilize global grain and energy markets, as Ukraine and Russia are major exporters, potentially lowering food and fuel prices worldwide. The social impact within Ukraine is profound, with millions of refugees and internally displaced persons whose ability to return home depends on the terms of any agreement. Downstream consequences include the potential for post-conflict reconstruction, which the World Bank estimates could cost over $400 billion, and the long-term political alignment of Ukraine, influencing the balance of power between Western institutions and an axis led by Russia and China.
As of late 2024, the war is largely characterized by positional warfare along a largely static front line exceeding 1,000 kilometers. Ukraine's 2023 counteroffensive failed to achieve a major breakthrough, and Russian forces have made incremental gains, particularly around Avdiivka. Diplomatic activity continues but remains fragmented. Ukraine promotes its 10-point peace formula through international summits, while Russia insists any talks must accept the 'new territorial realities.' The United States Congress passed a $61 billion aid package for Ukraine in April 2024 after months of delay, ensuring continued military support. China and other Global South nations continue to call for peace talks, but no direct negotiations between Kyiv and Moscow are underway. The immediate focus for both sides appears to be military consolidation and preparation for potential operations in 2025.
Ukraine's official conditions, outlined in President Zelenskyy's 10-point peace formula, primarily demand the full restoration of Ukraine's territorial integrity within its 1991 borders, including Crimea and Donbas. Other key points include the complete withdrawal of Russian troops, justice for war crimes, and security guarantees to prevent future aggression.
Russia's publicly stated demands include Ukraine's recognition of Russia's sovereignty over Crimea and the annexed territories of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson. It also seeks guarantees of Ukrainian neutrality, meaning no NATO membership, and the 'demilitarization' and 'denazification' of Ukraine, terms Kyiv rejects as infringements on its sovereignty.
The most substantive talks occurred in Istanbul in March 2022, where a draft framework was discussed. It reportedly included Ukrainian neutrality in exchange for security guarantees. The talks collapsed, and no high-level, direct bilateral negotiations have occurred since then, though there have been lower-level contacts and international conferences about peace principles.
Yes, the prediction market resolves to 'Yes' for a ceasefire or armistice agreement, which is a temporary halt to fighting. This is distinct from a comprehensive peace treaty that resolves all political issues. Historical precedents like the Korean War armistice show that ceasefires can last for decades without a final political settlement.
This is a critical unresolved question. Potential guarantors discussed include major powers like the United States, China, or a coalition of nations, or international bodies like the United Nations. Enforcement mechanisms, such as peacekeeping missions or security guarantees, would be essential components of any credible agreement to ensure compliance.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!

No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/qy6aTr" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Ukraine signs peace deal with Russia by January 31?"></iframe>