This event has ended. Showing historical data.

$21.53K
1
1

1 market tracked
No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
Will Trump make a new free trade agreement with any country before Jan 20, 2029? | Kalshi | 56% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
During his term If a new free trade agreement with any country has become law before January 20, 2029, then the market resolves to Yes. Early close condition: This market will close and expire early if the event occurs. This market will close and expire early if the event occurs.
Prediction markets currently give about a 3 in 10 chance that former President Donald Trump will sign a new free trade agreement with China into law before January 20, 2029. This means traders collectively see a deal as possible, but fairly unlikely. The low trading volume, just over $43,000 on Kalshi, suggests this is a specialized topic with limited consensus, so the odds may be more volatile.
The low probability reflects the significant hurdles to a new deal. First, the relationship between the U.S. and China has become more confrontational since the "Phase One" trade deal was signed in 2020. That agreement left many larger issues unresolved, and both nations have since increased tariffs and restrictions on technology and investment.
Second, the political appetite for traditional free trade agreements has diminished in both countries. In the U.S., there is bipartisan support for being tougher on China, focusing on protecting American industries rather than expanding market access. For China, agreeing to the types of enforceable terms the U.S. would likely demand could be seen as a concession of sovereignty.
Finally, a "free trade agreement" is a specific, major legal pact that requires lengthy negotiation and Congressional approval. Given the current tensions, markets are betting that the more probable outcome is continued managed trade through smaller, targeted deals or tariffs, not a sweeping new agreement.
The main event to watch is the 2024 U.S. presidential election. A Trump victory would reset the timeline and define his administration's trade priorities. Early 2025 would then be key for signals about his approach.
Other important moments would be any high-level meetings between U.S. and Chinese leaders, which could signal a thaw or a deepening freeze. Announcements from the U.S. Trade Representative's office regarding the review of existing China tariffs would also be a concrete indicator of direction. Finally, watch for any major shifts in the Chinese economy that might increase Beijing's urgency to make a deal.
Prediction markets have a mixed record on complex, long-term geopolitical deals. They are generally good at aggregating known information about political incentives and obstacles, which is why the odds are low. However, they can struggle with "black swan" events or sudden diplomatic breakthroughs. For a multi-year process like this, the current forecast is a snapshot of today's political reality, which can change. The low trading volume means the current price is less robust and could move significantly on major news.
Prediction markets assign a low 29% probability to Donald Trump securing a new free trade agreement with China before January 20, 2029. This price indicates traders view a new deal as unlikely, though not impossible. With only $43,000 in total volume, liquidity is thin, suggesting this is a speculative market without strong consensus from institutional players.
The low probability reflects the entrenched strategic rivalry between the U.S. and China. The Phase One trade deal negotiated by the Trump administration in 2020 largely failed to meet its purchase targets and did not address core disputes over industrial policy. Current U.S. policy, maintained under the Biden administration, focuses on tariffs and export controls targeting China's technological advancement, a framework Trump has endorsed and promised to expand. A genuine "free trade agreement" would require a dramatic reversal of this decoupling stance, which faces bipartisan opposition in Congress. Markets price in the high probability that any second-term Trump trade policy would involve increased tariffs and unilateral pressure, not a comprehensive bilateral pact.
A significant shift in the odds would require a clear signal that major negotiations are imminent. This could happen if Trump publicly prioritizes a new trade deal framework during the 2024 campaign or after a potential inauguration in January 2025. Conversely, odds would fall further following explicit adversarial actions, such as announcing sweeping new tariff rates on Chinese goods. The thin market volume means any concrete news could cause sharp price movements. The January 2025 presidential inauguration is the next major calendar event that could reset the policy timeline and market expectations.
This contract is trading exclusively on Kalshi. The absence of a comparable market on platforms like Polymarket limits arbitrage opportunities and price discovery. The single-platform listing contributes to the low liquidity and may result in a price that is more volatile in response to news.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$21.53K
1
1
This prediction market addresses whether former President Donald Trump will negotiate and implement a new free trade agreement with China during a potential second term in office, concluding by January 20, 2029. The question centers on whether the existing Phase One trade deal, signed in January 2020, will be replaced or significantly expanded into a more comprehensive bilateral trade pact. The outcome depends on complex diplomatic negotiations, domestic political will in both countries, and the broader strategic competition between the United States and China. Interest in this topic stems from the profound impact such an agreement would have on global supply chains, tariffs, and the economic relationship between the world's two largest economies. During his first term, Trump initiated a trade war with China, imposing tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of goods. His campaign rhetoric for the 2024 election has included promises to impose even higher tariffs, but also hints at potentially negotiating a new deal. Observers are divided on whether his aggressive tariff strategy is a permanent policy or a negotiating tactic to secure a more favorable agreement. The market reflects uncertainty about whether a return to the White House would mean escalation or resolution of the ongoing trade tensions.
Modern U.S.-China trade relations were fundamentally shaped by China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001. This granted China permanent normal trade relations status with the U.S., leading to a massive increase in bilateral trade but also growing U.S. trade deficits and complaints about intellectual property theft and forced technology transfer. The Obama administration pursued the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), partly as a strategic counter to China, which Trump withdrew from in 2017. The defining recent precedent is the trade war initiated by President Trump in March 2018. Citing an investigation under Section 301, the U.S. imposed tariffs on approximately $50 billion worth of Chinese imports, triggering retaliatory tariffs from China. This escalated through 2018 and 2019, with the U.S. imposing tariffs on over $350 billion of Chinese goods. After prolonged negotiations, the two sides signed the "Economic and Trade Agreement" (Phase One) in January 2020. This deal committed China to purchasing an additional $200 billion in U.S. goods and services over 2020-2021 and included pledges on intellectual property and financial services. However, it did not address core U.S. grievances about China's industrial subsidies and state-led economic model, and China fell short of its purchase commitments. The Biden administration largely maintained these tariffs while shifting focus to allied coordination and investment controls.
A new free trade agreement would directly affect the cost of thousands of consumer goods, agricultural exports, and industrial components, impacting inflation and business costs worldwide. It would reshape global supply chains, potentially encouraging or discouraging companies to move manufacturing out of China. For the U.S., a deal could provide market access for farmers and certain industries but might also affect domestic manufacturing jobs depending on its terms. Politically, a major deal would be a significant foreign policy achievement but could face backlash from lawmakers and voters concerned about China's economic practices and human rights record. It would also influence America's strategic posture in Asia, affecting relationships with allies who are also navigating economic dependence on China. The outcome signals whether the world's two largest economies will move toward managed competition with rules or toward a more decoupled, adversarial economic relationship.
As of mid-2024, the Phase One trade deal has effectively lapsed without a successor agreement. The Biden administration has maintained the Trump-era tariffs while initiating a formal review of the Section 301 tariffs, a process required four years after their imposition. In the 2024 presidential campaign, Donald Trump has proposed escalating tariffs on China, including a potential 60% tariff or higher. No formal negotiations for a new comprehensive free trade agreement are underway between the U.S. and Chinese governments. The political environment in the U.S. remains broadly skeptical of free trade agreements with China, making the legislative path for ratification uncertain.
The Phase One deal, signed in January 2020, focused on increasing Chinese purchases of U.S. goods. China committed to buying an additional $200 billion in U.S. exports over 2020 and 2021. It also included chapters on intellectual property protection, forced technology transfer, financial services market access, and currency practices. It did not address U.S. concerns about China's industrial subsidies or its state-owned enterprise model.
Starting in 2018, the Trump administration imposed tariffs on Chinese imports in multiple waves under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. These included 25% tariffs on approximately $250 billion worth of goods like industrial components and machinery, and 7.5% tariffs on about $112 billion worth of consumer goods like clothing and electronics. China retaliated with tariffs on U.S. agricultural and energy exports.
A president can negotiate a trade agreement, but its legal force depends on the type. A comprehensive free trade agreement that changes U.S. tariff rates or other laws typically requires implementing legislation passed by Congress. The president can use existing authority to modify some tariffs, but a full-fledged agreement like the USMCA would need Congressional approval.
During his 2024 campaign, Donald Trump has proposed imposing a universal 10% tariff on all imports to the U.S. and specifically targeting Chinese goods with tariffs of 60% or higher. He has also discussed the possibility of revoking China's "Most Favored Nation" trade status, which would lead to significantly higher baseline tariffs under U.S. law.
Studies, including from the Federal Reserve and the Congressional Budget Office, found the tariffs increased costs for U.S. businesses that rely on Chinese imports and led to higher prices for consumers. They also caused economic uncertainty and disrupted supply chains. The trade war provided some protection for specific domestic industries but resulted in net economic costs and reduced U.S. real income according to several economic analyses.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/rzv3iP" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Will Trump make a new free trade agreement?"></iframe>