
$1.17M
1
1

1 market tracked

No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
![]() | Poly | 66% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Israel initiates a drone, missile, or air strike on Iranian soil or any official Iranian embassy or consulate by March 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "strike" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones or missiles (including cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by Israeli military forces that impact Iranian ground territory or any official Iranian embassy or consulate (e.
Prediction markets currently assign a 66% probability that Israel will conduct a military strike on Iranian soil or an official diplomatic mission by March 31, 2026. This price, translating to a two-in-three chance, indicates the market views such an escalation as more likely than not, but with significant remaining uncertainty. With $1.2 million in trading volume, this high-liquidity market reflects substantial investor engagement and confidence in its current pricing as a meaningful risk assessment.
The elevated probability is primarily driven by a sustained cycle of regional escalation. Israel's stated policy of acting to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, combined with direct strikes on Iranian military officials and assets in Syria, has established a precedent for kinetic action. Recent increases in Iranian uranium enrichment levels and the breakdown of the JCPOA nuclear deal have intensified Israeli security concerns, making preemptive action a continuously debated option. Furthermore, the market is pricing in the historical pattern of shadow warfare, including cyber attacks and assassinations on Iranian soil, escalating into more overt military engagements.
The primary downward pressure on the current "Yes" odds would be a successful de-escalation or renewed diplomatic engagement, potentially mediated by global powers ahead of key dates like the U.S. presidential inauguration in January 2025. Conversely, odds could spike toward certainty following a major triggering event. This includes a successful Iranian nuclear weapons test, a catastrophic attack on Israeli assets directly traced to Tehran, or a large-scale Hezbollah rocket campaign from Lebanon that Israel attributes to Iranian command. The market will be highly sensitive to rhetoric from Israeli and Iranian leadership in the coming months, as well as the posture of the next U.S. administration regarding red lines and military support.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$1.17M
1
1
This prediction market addresses the possibility of direct military action by Israel against Iranian territory or diplomatic facilities by March 31, 2026. The market specifically resolves to 'Yes' if Israel initiates a drone, missile, or air strike that impacts Iranian soil or any official Iranian embassy or consulate. This question sits at the heart of one of the world's most volatile geopolitical rivalries, reflecting escalating tensions that have largely been conducted through proxy conflicts and covert operations rather than direct state-on-state military engagement. The period leading up to March 2026 is considered critical by many analysts, as it encompasses key milestones in Iran's nuclear program and potential changes in regional power dynamics. Recent developments, including Israel's more overt military actions against Iranian interests in Syria and the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists, have shifted the conflict into a more public and potentially escalatory phase. International interest in this topic stems from its potential to trigger a broader regional war, disrupt global energy supplies, and fundamentally reshape Middle Eastern alliances, making it a focal point for intelligence agencies, financial markets, and diplomatic corps worldwide.
The Israeli-Iranian shadow war has deep roots, intensifying after the 1979 Iranian Revolution, which replaced Israel's regional ally, the Shah, with a theocratic regime openly hostile to the Jewish state. A major turning point was Israel's 1981 Operation Opera, a preemptive airstrike that destroyed Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor, establishing a precedent for unilateral action against perceived nuclear threats. This doctrine was echoed in 2007 with Operation Orchard, where Israel bombed a suspected nuclear reactor in Syria. For decades, direct conflict was avoided, with hostilities channeled through proxies like Hezbollah in Lebanon and Iranian-backed militias in Syria. However, the landscape shifted after the U.S. withdrawal from the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018 and Iran's subsequent expansion of its nuclear program. A significant escalation occurred in April 2024, when Israel reportedly conducted a drone strike on an Iranian airbase near Isfahan, a direct attack on Iranian soil that marked a departure from previous covert and proxy engagements. This event, coupled with Iran's unprecedented direct missile and drone attack on Israel in retaliation for an earlier strike on its Damascus consulate, created a new paradigm of overt military exchanges between the two states.
A direct Israeli strike on Iran would have profound and immediate global consequences. Economically, it would likely trigger a massive spike in global oil prices, as approximately 20% of the world's oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has threatened to close. Financial markets would experience severe volatility, and global supply chains, already fragile, could face new disruptions. Politically, such an attack would test the durability of international alliances, potentially forcing Arab states that have normalized relations with Israel into difficult public positions and challenging the U.S. to balance its support for Israel with its desire to avoid a major regional war. The social impact would be devastating within the region, potentially mobilizing populations and militias across the Middle East and exacerbating sectarian tensions. Beyond the immediate conflict, a strike could irrevocably collapse the existing non-proliferation framework, encouraging other states in the region to pursue nuclear weapons capabilities and setting a precedent for preventive military action globally.
As of late 2024, tensions remain at a historic high following the cycle of direct attacks in April. Israel continues its campaign of targeting Iranian military personnel and assets in Syria, while Iran has continued to advance its nuclear program, installing more advanced centrifuges at its underground Fordow facility. Diplomatic efforts to revive the JCPOA are stalled. The United States maintains a significant military presence in the region, including aircraft carriers and missile defense systems, aimed at deterring further escalation. Intelligence communities are closely monitoring indicators of military preparation on both sides.
Yes, in a significant escalation, Israel is widely believed to have conducted a drone strike on an Iranian airbase near Isfahan in April 2024. Prior to this, hostilities were primarily conducted through cyber attacks, assassinations of scientists, and strikes on Iranian proxies in neighboring countries like Syria.
Iran's primary retaliatory capabilities include a large arsenal of ballistic and cruise missiles capable of reaching Israel, thousands of drones, and a network of proxy forces across the region, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, which possesses an estimated 150,000 rockets. Iran can also threaten maritime traffic in the Persian Gulf.
The United States provides Israel with advanced military technology, intelligence sharing, and diplomatic cover. It attempts to deter Israeli action by offering alternative strategies while also maintaining its own military forces in the region to deter Iranian aggression, creating a complex balance between restraint and alliance commitment.
Primary targets would likely be nuclear facilities like Natanz and Fordow, missile production sites, drone manufacturing centers, and command-and-control nodes for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The difficulty of destroying deeply buried facilities like Fordow is a major strategic challenge.
Reactions would be divided. Gulf Arab states like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, while quietly opposed to Iranian hegemony, would publicly condemn the strike to placate their domestic populations. Iran's allies, such as Syria and Iraqi militias, would likely be mobilized for retaliation, potentially opening multiple fronts against Israel.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!

No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/uh1FPt" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Israel strikes Iran by March 31, 2026?"></iframe>