
$13.35K
1
1

1 market tracked
No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
Will the US agree to a new Iranian nuclear deal this year? | Kalshi | 36% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
In 2026 If the United States agreed to, signed, or accepted a new Iran-US nuclear deal before Jan 1, 2027, then the market resolves to Yes. An agreement also made with other countries (i.e. multilaterally) is still encompassed if the United States participates. "A new Iran-US nuclear deal" means a formal written agreement signed by authorized representatives of both the United States and Iran that (1) imposes verifiable restrictions on Iran's nuclear program, including limits on uranium enrichm
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
$13.35K
1
1
This prediction market topic concerns the possibility of a new formal nuclear agreement between the United States and Iran being reached before January 1, 2027. A 'Yes' resolution requires a formal written agreement signed by authorized representatives of both nations that imposes verifiable restrictions on Iran's nuclear program, including limits on uranium enrichment, and provides sanctions relief to Iran. The agreement may be bilateral or multilateral, provided both the U.S. and Iran are participants. The topic emerges from the collapse of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the subsequent U.S. withdrawal in 2018, and Iran's accelerated nuclear advancements. Recent diplomatic efforts, including indirect talks mediated by Oman and Qatar, have kept the prospect of a deal alive, though significant obstacles remain. Interest in this market stems from its implications for Middle East stability, global non-proliferation efforts, oil markets, and the foreign policy legacies of the involved administrations. The 2026 timeframe coincides with a potential new U.S. presidential term and Iranian presidential elections, making it a critical window for diplomatic breakthrough or further escalation.
The modern diplomatic history of Iran's nuclear program is defined by the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Negotiated by the Obama administration alongside the UK, France, Germany, Russia, and China, the JCPOA imposed strict limits on Iran's nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) repeatedly verified Iranian compliance until 2019. In May 2018, President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew the United States from the agreement, re-imposing and expanding severe economic sanctions under a 'maximum pressure' campaign. In response, beginning in 2019, Iran incrementally breached the deal's key restrictions, increasing uranium enrichment levels, stockpiles, and advancing centrifuge research. Efforts to revive the deal began with the Biden administration in 2021, with indirect talks in Vienna. These negotiations stalled repeatedly over issues like the scope of sanctions relief, guarantees against future U.S. withdrawal, and the status of the IAEA's investigation into undeclared nuclear material. The 2022 protests in Iran and the country's military support for Russia in Ukraine further poisoned the diplomatic atmosphere, creating a cycle of escalation with no functioning agreement in place.
A new nuclear deal would have profound implications for global security and economics. Success would significantly reduce the immediate risk of a nuclear-armed Iran, potentially averting a regional arms race or military conflict in the Middle East. It would also reintegrate Iran's substantial oil reserves into global markets, potentially lowering energy prices and easing inflation. Politically, it would represent a major diplomatic achievement for the involved powers and could open channels for addressing other regional conflicts. Conversely, failure to reach a deal likely means continued escalation. Iran's 'breakout time'—the time needed to produce enough fissile material for one nuclear weapon—would remain short, increasing the risk of preventive military strikes by Israel or others. Persistent sanctions would continue to strain Iran's economy, potentially fueling domestic unrest. The credibility of the global non-proliferation regime and the utility of diplomatic solutions would be further undermined, setting a dangerous precedent for other would-be proliferators.
As of late 2024, diplomatic efforts are at a low ebb with no active, direct negotiations occurring. Following the death of President Ebrahim Raisi, Iran is in a political transition period leading to presidential elections scheduled for June 28, 2024. The Biden administration has stated its openness to diplomacy but emphasizes that the window for a return to the JCPOA is closed, suggesting any new deal would need to address broader concerns. Iran continues to expand its nuclear program technically while expressing a willingness to return to talks, but only if the U.S. offers comprehensive sanctions relief. The International Atomic Energy Agency reports that Iran's nuclear advancements are continuing unabated, further complicating the baseline for any future agreement.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) is the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers. It limited Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. The U.S. withdrew in 2018 under President Trump, and Iran subsequently breached many of its limits.
Key obstacles include the scope of U.S. sanctions to be lifted, Iran's demand for guarantees against a future U.S. withdrawal, the status of Iran's advanced centrifuges and uranium stockpile, and the IAEA's investigation into past nuclear activities. Iran also refuses to discuss its missile program or regional policies.
Iran has not made a political decision to build a bomb, but it has shortened the technical time required to do so significantly. Experts estimate it could produce enough weapons-grade uranium for one bomb in about a week, though constructing a deliverable warhead would take longer, likely 6 months to a year.
Without a deal, Iran is likely to continue advancing its nuclear program, further reducing breakout time. This increases the risk of a regional arms race or preventive military strikes. Sanctions on Iran will remain, and diplomatic isolation will persist, potentially fueling instability.
Yes, as demonstrated in 2018, a future U.S. president could unilaterally withdraw from any executive agreement, as the JCPOA was not a ratified treaty. This uncertainty is a major concern for Iran and is a central point in current negotiations about providing guarantees.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!
No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/wzuK8d" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="New US-Iran nuclear deal in 2026?"></iframe>