

$19.08K
1
1
1 market tracked
No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
Will Trump make IVF free? | Kalshi | 20% |
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
Before his term ends If the President takes an action that eliminates the cost of at least one IVF cycle before Jan 20, 2029, then the market resolves to Yes. Early close condition: This market will close and expire early if the event occurs. This market will close and expire early if the event occurs.
Prediction markets currently assign a low 19% probability that former President Donald Trump will enact a policy making at least one cycle of in vitro fertilization (IVF) free before January 20, 2029. This price indicates the market views such an outcome as unlikely, though not impossible. With only $19,000 in volume, this is a thinly traded market, suggesting the consensus is tentative and could be more sensitive to new information than a highly liquid market.
The primary factor suppressing the probability is the absence of IVF policy as a core Trump campaign plank. His public focus and legislative history have centered on other healthcare and economic issues, not on subsidizing specific fertility treatments. Furthermore, the significant federal cost of a national IVF subsidy program, which could amount to billions annually, conflicts with broader Republican fiscal priorities of spending restraint. The market is also pricing in the complex political landscape, where any major healthcare entitlement would face a contentious legislative battle, even with unified Republican control of government.
The odds could rise sharply if Trump explicitly champions a federal IVF subsidy program in a major policy speech or includes it in his official campaign platform. A decisive Republican victory in the 2024 elections, securing the White House and strong congressional majorities, would also increase the feasibility of such a policy, potentially lifting the probability. Conversely, the odds could fall toward zero if Trump or prominent congressional allies publicly reject the concept of federal IVF funding. The market will be most reactive to direct statements from the candidate, with the party conventions and presidential debates serving as key potential catalysts for policy clarification.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
This prediction market topic addresses whether former President Donald Trump will implement a policy making in vitro fertilization (IVF) free for at least one cycle before the end of his potential presidential term on January 20, 2029. IVF is an assisted reproductive technology where eggs are fertilized by sperm outside the body, with resulting embryos transferred to a uterus. The procedure is a primary treatment for infertility but carries significant financial costs, typically ranging from $12,000 to $25,000 per cycle in the United States, often not covered by insurance. The market resolves to 'Yes' if, before the end of his term, President Trump takes an action that eliminates the cost of at least one IVF cycle, such as through federal legislation, an executive order, or a regulatory mandate. The topic sits at the intersection of healthcare policy, reproductive rights, and political economics. Interest in this market surged following the Alabama Supreme Court's February 2024 ruling that frozen embryos are considered children under state law, which temporarily halted IVF services and ignited a national debate about reproductive technology access. Proponents of free IVF argue it addresses declining birth rates and supports family building, while critics question the fiscal responsibility and potential federal overreach. The topic is politically charged, as Trump and the Republican Party have navigated complex positions on reproductive issues post the Dobbs v. Jackson decision.
The political and policy landscape for IVF in the United States has evolved significantly since the first successful U.S. IVF birth in 1981. For decades, federal policy largely avoided the issue, leaving regulation to states and coverage to private insurers. A major shift occurred with the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010, which allowed states to define infertility as an essential health benefit, paving the way for state-level insurance mandates. As of 2024, 21 states and Washington D.C. have laws requiring some level of insurance coverage for infertility diagnosis and treatment, though the scope and requirements for IVF coverage vary widely. At the federal level, IVF has been entangled in debates over embryonic research. From 1996 to 2015, the Dickey-Wicker Amendment annually prohibited federal funding for the creation of human embryos for research purposes or for research in which embryos are destroyed, which indirectly affected certain IVF-related research. The modern political flashpoint arrived with the Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision in June 2022, which overturned Roe v. Wade and returned abortion regulation to the states. This decision triggered a re-examination of all laws pertaining to embryos and fetuses, culminating in the Alabama Supreme Court's LePage v. Center for Reproductive Medicine ruling in February 2024, which declared frozen embryos were children under the state's Wrongful Death of a Minor Act. This ruling created immediate legal uncertainty for IVF clinics and patients, forcing a national political reckoning on IVF access.
The question of making IVF free carries profound implications for public health, economic equity, and demographic trends. Medically, it would redefine infertility from an elective, often prohibitively expensive treatment to a covered healthcare service, potentially allowing hundreds of thousands of individuals and couples to build families who currently cannot afford to do so. This could have a measurable impact on the national birth rate, which has been in decline for years, with significant long-term consequences for workforce demographics and social support systems like Social Security. Economically, a federal policy to cover IVF would represent a major new expenditure, likely costing tens of billions of dollars over a decade, while also shifting financial burden from patients and private employers to the federal government. It would also disrupt the existing market of fertility clinics and financing companies. Politically, the issue forces a confrontation within the Republican coalition between social conservatives, who have ethical concerns about embryo creation and disposition, and pro-family economic conservatives, who support policies that encourage childbirth. The outcome will signal the post-Dobbs direction of the party on reproductive technology and family policy more broadly.
As of mid-2024, there is no federal policy or legislation proposed by Donald Trump or congressional Republicans to make IVF free. The immediate political response to the Alabama ruling has been defensive. In April 2024, House Republicans proposed the 'IVF Protection Act,' which aimed to protect access to IVF but did not address cost or provide federal funding. President Trump has expressed support for IVF access but has not detailed a policy platform for his 2024 campaign that includes federal subsidies or mandates for free treatment. The Biden administration has highlighted the Alabama case to argue that Trump and Republicans pose a threat to reproductive care broadly. The legislative path remains blocked by partisan division, with Democrats supporting the Access to Family Building Act for federal protections and Republicans favoring state-level solutions. The issue is expected to remain prominent in the 2024 election cycle.
IVF stands for In Vitro Fertilization. It is a multi-step medical procedure where eggs are retrieved from a woman's ovaries and fertilized by sperm in a laboratory. The resulting embryos are then monitored and typically one or more are transferred into the uterus with the goal of achieving a pregnancy.
Costs with insurance vary drastically. In states with mandated coverage, patients may pay only copays and deductibles, potentially reducing costs to a few thousand dollars. In states without mandates or for patients with plans that exclude IVF, they typically pay the full $15,000 to $25,000 per cycle out-of-pocket.
No U.S. president has ever implemented a policy making IVF free. Federal involvement has been limited to regulating embryonic research and, through the ACA, allowing states to mandate insurance coverage. No administration has established a national program to fully cover the cost of IVF cycles for all patients.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
Share your predictions and analysis with other traders. Coming soon!
No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/zmztT_" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Will Trump make IVF free?"></iframe>