BackKKALSHI

Will the U.S. Court of International Trade rule issues a written ruling that holds unlawful, vacates, sets aside, or enjoins collection of the 10%–12.5% Section 301 forced-labor tariffs, in whole or in part, as to any party?

Yes0%

Vol$0.00

Outcomes2

TradeTrade on Kalshi

Event

MarketKALSHIactive

MarketKALSHIactiveOther

Will the U.S. Court of International Trade rule issues a written ruling that holds unlawful, vacates, sets aside, or enjoins collection of the 10%–12.5% Section 301 forced-labor tariffs, in whole or in part, as to any party?

Part of: Will the CIT strike down Trump's Section 301 tariffs in 2026?

NoNo Price

100¢

VolTotal Volume

$0.00

Outcomes

Ends

Jan 8, 2027

in 3 months

Trade on Kalshi

Will the U.S. Court of International Trade rule issues a written ruling that holds unlawful, vacates, sets aside, or enjoins collection of the 10%–12.5% Section 301 forced-labor tariffs, in whole or in part, as to any party?

100¢

Vol

$0.00

Outcomes

Trade

Yes0.2¢

No99.8¢

Price History

Will the U.S. Court of International Trade rule issues a written ruling that holds unlawful, vacates, sets aside, or enjoins collection of the 10%–12.5% Section 301 forced-labor tariffs, in whole or in part, as to any party?

No historical data available

Price history will appear here when available

Resolution Information

Status

Active

Expected Resolution

January 08, 2027

3:00 PM GMT+0

Official Sources

Markets are resolved using official government and institutional sources.

Learn more

Accuracy

100%

Resolved

8,750

Avg Time

< 24 hours

Disputes

Resolution Criteria

If the U.S. Court of International Trade issues a written ruling that holds unlawful, vacates, sets aside, or enjoins collection of the 10%–12.5% Section 301 forced-labor tariffs, in whole or in part, as to any party in any case challenging the Section 301 forced-labor tariffs imposed effective July 24, 2026, including Burlap and Barrel, Inc. v. United States and New York v. United States, No. 26-03467, or any consolidation or recaptioning thereof before Jan 1, 2027, then the market resolves to Yes. The ruling must: Be issued by the U.S. Court of International Trade in any case challenging the Section 301 forced-labor tariffs imposed effective July 24, 2026, including Burlap and Barrel, Inc. v. United States and New York v. United States, No. 26-03467, or any consolidation or recaptioning thereof Address the matter described by the specified judgment Be issued through a written order, opinion, judgment, or decision The following do NOT satisfy the Payout Criterion: Oral rulings from the bench unless reduced to a written order Tentative rulings that are not made final Draft opinions that leak but are not officially issued Settlements or voluntary dismissals Administrative or scheduling orders Orders to show cause Minute orders that do not address the substantive issue in the specified judgment For clarity: If the case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, that counts as a ruling only if the judgment refers to jurisdiction Sua sponte rulings count if they match the specified judgment Per curiam opinions and summary orders count as rulings If multiple judges issue separate opinions, the majority/plurality opinion controls This market will close and expire early if the event occurs.

Market Still Active

This market has not yet resolved. Resolution will occur after the specified end date based on the criteria above.

Resolution Info

Market Stats

Resolution Countdown

88 Days Left

January 08, 2027 • 3:00 PM

Last Updated

less than a minute ago

Event Group

Will the CIT strike down Trump's Section 301 tariffs in 2026?

Event

Will the CIT strike down Trump's Section 301 tariffs in 2026?