BackKKALSHI

Will the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California rule rules in favor of Meta Platforms, Inc. on the plaintiff States' claims that it designed Facebook and Instagram to cause compulsive use by minors and that it misrepresented the safety of those platforms?

Yes0%

Vol$0.00

Outcomes2

TradeTrade on Kalshi

Event

MarketKALSHIactive

MarketKALSHIactiveOther

Will the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California rule rules in favor of Meta Platforms, Inc. on the plaintiff States' claims that it designed Facebook and Instagram to cause compulsive use by minors and that it misrepresented the safety of those platforms?

Part of: Meta wins child safety trial?

NoNo Price

100¢

VolTotal Volume

$0.00

Outcomes

Ends

Jul 8, 2027

in 9 months

Trade on Kalshi

Will the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California rule rules in favor of Meta Platforms, Inc. on the plaintiff States' claims that it designed Facebook and Instagram to cause compulsive use by minors and that it misrepresented the safety of those platforms?

100¢

Vol

$0.00

Outcomes

Trade

Yes0.0¢

No100.0¢

Price History

Will the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California rule rules in favor of Meta Platforms, Inc. on the plaintiff States' claims that it designed Facebook and Instagram to cause compulsive use by minors and that it misrepresented the safety of those platforms?

No historical data available

Price history will appear here when available

Resolution Information

Status

Active

Expected Resolution

July 08, 2027

2:00 PM GMT+0

Official Sources

Markets are resolved using official government and institutional sources.

Learn more

Accuracy

100%

Resolved

8,750

Avg Time

< 24 hours

Disputes

Resolution Criteria

If the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California rules in favor of Meta Platforms, Inc. on the plaintiff States' claims that it designed Facebook and Instagram to cause compulsive use by minors and that it misrepresented the safety of those platforms in the state attorney general actions in In re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation, No. 4:22-md-03047 before Jul 1, 2027, then the market resolves to Yes. This market turns on liability on two theories, not on money. It resolves YES only if the court rules for Meta on both the claim that it designed Facebook and Instagram to cause compulsive use by minors and the claim that it misrepresented the safety of those platforms. A ruling for the plaintiff States on either one resolves it to NO. The ruling must be issued by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in these actions, must address the matter described by the specified judgment, and must be issued through a written order, opinion, judgment or decision. The advisory jury's verdict is not a ruling of the court, so only the court's own written findings of fact, conclusions of law, order or judgment count. Outside this market: The plaintiff States' claims under the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), which are also being tried, and any claim or part of a claim resting on the COPPA violations the court found in June 2026, including an unfair competition claim predicated on them. A ruling for the States on any of those does not by itself resolve this market NO. Monetary relief and its amount. The court may rule for Meta here and still order Meta to pay on the COPPA claims; what Meta is ordered to pay is measured by the separate market on that question. Injunctive relief, however broad. The personal injury, school district and other actions in this multidistrict litigation. The following do NOT satisfy the Payout Criterion: A settlement of any size, or a voluntary dismissal, whether or not its terms are disclosed A ruling for Meta on one of the two claims but not the other Oral rulings from the bench unless reduced to a written order Tentative rulings that are not made final Administrative or scheduling orders, orders to show cause, and minute orders that do not address the substantive issue For clarity: sua sponte rulings count if they match the specified judgment, and per curiam opinions and summary orders count as rulings. Only the district court's ruling counts, and a later reversal on appeal does not reverse a settled outcome. This market will close and expire early if the event occurs.

Market Still Active

This market has not yet resolved. Resolution will occur after the specified end date based on the criteria above.

Resolution Info

Market Stats

Resolution Countdown

269 Days Left

July 08, 2027 • 2:00 PM

Last Updated

less than a minute ago

Event Group

Meta wins child safety trial?

Event

Meta wins child safety trial?